Desperate need for better management of Fournier's gangrene.

INTRODUCTION: To compare earlier and later patient groups with Fournier's gangrene, specifically with the incidence of rising antibiotic resistance rates in mind. Primary endpoints were to compare therapy, outcomes, and resistance rates. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A multicentric, retrospective, multi-national study was performed. Two groups with different time frames of treatment were defined: Group 1 (n = 50) and Group 2 (n = 104). Demographics and outcomes were analysed using Student-t test, chi-square test, or Fisher exact test. Survival data were estimated using the Kaplan Meier method and compared by Log rank testing. RESULTS: There were no significant demographic differences. Nor was there any significant difference in therapy or outcomes in the groups except for the duration of intensive care unit treatment, which lasted a mean 6.3 days in Group 1 and 11.5 days in Group 2 (p = 0.018). Survival time did not improve over the years (p = 0.268). We fortunately did not observe an increased rate of multi-resistant organisms (p = 1.000). This study's limitations are mainly due to its retrospective study design. CONCLUSIONS: Despite increasing antibiotic resistance rates worldwide, it was not apparent in our population. But the situation for these patients is alarming, since final outcome failed to improve over the last ten years despite more intensive critical-care therapy.

Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Prostate Biopsies: Contemporary Practice Patterns in Germany.

PURPOSE: Prostate biopsy (pbx) is the most common outpatient procedure in urology. Complications are urinary tract infections, including hospitalization and sepsis. Recommendations on antibiotic prophylaxis (apx) are scarce, and healthcare data are not available. The study addressed the following endpoints: the duration and spectrum of antimicrobial prophylaxis in transrectal and transperineal pbx in the hospital and the practice setting. METHODS: A questionnaire compiled data about age, gender, board certification, and place of work. Information about the frequency of pbx, duration and type of apx, usage of disinfecting lubricant, and urine or rectal swab cultures was collected. The study refers to German urologists. RESULTS: Overall 478 urologists answered the questionnaire. 15.5% (74) of respondents were residents. 50.8% (243) of urologists work in a practice; the rest in a hospital. Only 4.8% do not perform pbx. Transrectal pbx are performed a median of two times a week. The majority (446, 98%) prescribe an apx, mostly fluoroquinolones (407, 89.5%). In total, 10.1% (46) of the participants use a single-shot-apx. apx has a median duration of 4 days. One-third uses a disinfecting lubricant. Urine and rectal swab cultures are analyzed by 45.5% (207) and 24.4% (111), respectively. CONCLUSION: Most urologists prescribe an extended apx for both transrectal and transperineal pbx. Perineal pbx is still a deviation from everyday practice and not an established alternative to transrectal pbx. Urologists are aware of the increasing fluoroquinolone-resistance and are adapting with rectal swab and urine cultures. Further studies need to evaluate alternatives to 5-day apx and results should be addressed in our guidelines. This is of importance in light of the increasing resistance rates and fluoroquinolone side effects.

The Impact of Gender on Tumour Stage in In-House Complications and Choice of Urinary Diversion: Results of the Austrian Cystectomy Registry.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Bladder cancer is characterized by gender-dependent disparities. To further address this issue, we analysed a prospective, multicentre cystectomy registry. METHODS: An online database was developed that included patient demographics, intra/perioperative data, surgical data and in-house complications. RESULTS: Four hundred fifty-eight patients (112 [24.5%] women and 346 [75.5%] men) were analysed. Men and women were comparable regarding age (mean 68 years), body mass index (mean 26.5) and the mean Charlson score (4.8). Women had more advanced tumour-stages (pT3/pT4; women: 57.1%; men: 48.1%). The rate of incontinent urinary diversion was higher in women (83.1%) than in men (60.2%) and in a multivariate analysis, the strongest predictors were M+ status (OR 11.2), female gender (OR 6.9) and age (OR 6.5). Women had a higher intraoperative blood transfusion rate. The overall rate of in-house complications was similar in both genders (men: 32.0%, women: 32.6%). Severe (Clavien-Dindo grade >2) medical (women: 6.3%; men: 5.2%) and surgical (women: 21.5%; men: 14.4%) in-house complications, however, were more frequent in women. CONCLUSIONS: This multicentre registry demonstrates several gender-related differences in patients undergoing radical cystectomy. The higher transfusion rate, the rare use of orthotopic bladder substitutes and the higher in-house complication rate underline the higher complexity of this procedure in women.

Mulitcenter study on antibiotic prophylaxis, infectious complications and risk assessment in TUR-P.

INTRODUCTION: Transurethral resection of the prostate is one of the most frequent urological procedures. Urinary tract infections represent major sequelae, but data about antibiotic prophylaxis in TUR-P are controversial and outdated. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective multicentre study of TUR-P in ten German hospitals. Primary endpoints were epidemiological and outcome data of TUR-P. Secondary endpoints were the identification of factors associated with febrile UTIs and sepsis after TUR-P. RESULTS: We included 444 patients with a median age of 71.0 years. Nearly every patient (93.5%) received some kind of antibiotic prophylaxis. Complication rates were 4.9% for febrile UTIs and 2.3% sepsis. Significant risk factors associated with febrile UTIs were pre-existing risk factors for UTIs (p = 0.035) and a duration of catheterization of more than three days (p <0.0001). Significant risk factors for sepsis were duration of surgery of more than 60 minutes (p = 0.030) and again a duration of catheterization of more than three days (p <0.0001). Interestingly, 50.8% of the cases had evidence of chronic prostatitis in their histological specimen. This evidence of chronic prostatitis was significantly associated with febrile UTIs (p = 0.019) and sepsis (p = 0.018). CONCLUSIONS: Duration of catheterization is one of the major risk factors for infectious complications after TUR-P. Antibiotic prophylaxis in TUR-P needs prospective investigation. These future studies should also address chronic prostatitis a priori.

Registry of implants for the reconstruction of pelvic floor in males and females: A feasibility case series.

INTRODUCTION: Most aspects of implant-assisted reconstruction of pelvic floor in males and females are under debate and the research is not standardized. Registries are supposed to shed light to the indications, surgical techniques and material properties and to establish a standardized evaluation. METHODS: A working group was formed to create an online platform for registration and outcome measurement of implant-assisted operations for pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and female and male stress urinary incontinence (SUI). 20 patients with modified mesh materials were evaluated over 23 months follow up in the registry to prove the feasibility of the registry. For validation a previously published modified "satisfaction, anatomy, continence, safety - S.(A.)C.S score" was used. RESULTS: A consensus was met on definitions and classifications of patient variables, surgical procedures and implants, as well as outcome parameters (efficacy, continence, satisfaction, complications). Different subgroup modules were formed in accordance with treated condition. The maximum score of cure was reached by 25-100% of patients depending on the indication. CONCLUSION: A prospective registry in accordance with IDEAL-D framework is justified for the evaluation and regulation of implants for pelvic floor reconstruction.

Nationwide survey of BK polyomavirus associated hemorrhagic cystitis in adult allogeneic stem cell transplantation among haematologists and urologists.

There are no epidemiological data on BK virus associated hemorrhagic cystitis (BKHC) in adult allogeneic stem cell transplantation in Germany available and associations with clinical conditions like GvHD are controversially discussed. Therefore, we conducted a nationwide survey among haematologists and urologists about this disease. We developed two questionnaires, one for haematologists (26 items) and one for urologists (20 items) concerning BKHC in adult allogeneic stem cell transplantation with epidemiological data and clinical implications. The survey was sent out at least three times to EBMT registered centres performing at least five transplantations a year, leading to 39 centres. The recruiting time was between January and June 2016. Total response rates were 76.9% among haematologists and 74.4% among urologists. BKHC seems to appear less frequent in this survey than it is described in the literature. Six deaths in the last 5 years due to this disease have been reported. Interestingly, haematologists as well as urologists mostly think that local therapy is most effective while 50.0% stated that there is no real effective oral or intravenous medication. Associations with other clinical conditions mentioned were heterogeneous, e.g. transplantation type, CMV reactivation, acute GvHD, nephropathy and worse clinical outcome. There was a significant discrepancy between haematologists and urologist concerning the association with acute GvHD (p = 0.004). We need prospective, multicentric clinical studies to evaluate local therapy and for developing a risk stratification model since this disease can be severe with morbidity and rarely mortality. In our opinion, this should be an interdisciplinary approach.

Impact of real-time elastography on magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasound fusion guided biopsy in patients with prior negative prostate biopsies.

PURPOSE: The fusion of multiparametric resonance imaging and ultrasound has been proven capable of detecting prostate cancer in different biopsy settings. The addition of real-time elastography promises to increase the precision of the outcome of targeted biopsies. We investigated whether real-time elastography improves magnetic resonance imaging/transrectal ultrasound fusion targeted biopsy in patients after previous negative biopsies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Prospectively 121 men underwent 3T magnetic resonance imaging. Using magnetic resonance imaging/real-time elastography fusion every suspicious lesion was characterized according to its tissue density and sampled by 2 fusion guided targeted biopsies. Additionally, all patients underwent 12-core systematic biopsy. The detection rate of clinically significant and insignificant cancers was compared between targeted und systematic biopsies. The accuracy to predict high grade prostate cancer was evaluated for with the PI-RADS scoring system and compared to the magnetic resonance imaging/real-time elastography fusion score. RESULTS: Overall prostate cancer was detected in 52 patients (43%). Targeted fusion guided biopsy revealed prostate cancer in 32 men (26.4%) and systematic biopsy in 46 (38%). The proportion of clinically significant cancers was higher for targeted biopsy (90.6%) compared to systematic biopsy (73.9%). The detection rate per core was higher for targeted biopsies (14.7%) compared to systematic biopsies (6.5%, p <0.001). The prediction of biopsy result according to magnetic resonance imaging/real-time elastography fusion was better (AUC 0.86) than magnetic resonance imaging alone (AUC 0.79). Sensitivity and specificity for magnetic resonance imaging/real-time elastography fusion was 77.8% and 77.3% vs 74.1% and 62.9% for magnetic resonance imaging. CONCLUSIONS: Magnetic resonance imaging/transrectal ultrasound fusion enhances the likelihood of detecting clinically significant cancers in a repeat biopsy setting. Adding real-time elastography to magnetic resonance imaging supports the characterization of cancer suspicious lesions.

A learning curve assessment of real-time sonoelastography of the prostate.

PURPOSE: To examine how much practice is essential to properly perform real-time sonoelastography (RTE) in the detection of PC. METHODS: RTE of the prostate was performed in 60 PC patients prior to radical prostatectomy (RP). All patients were examined by a novice and an expert observer in a blinded fashion. The novice's results were validated with the results of the expert. Kappa indexes, sensitivities, specificities as well as the duration of the examination were assessed. Learning curves (LC) were obtained by assessment of 16 (LC A) and eight (LC B) prostate sectors. Cochrane-Armitage trend test, Chi(2) test and t test for paired samples were used. RESULTS: For the 16-sector method (LC A), overall sensitivity and specificity were 58.2 and 77.7 % and, for the 8-sector method, 68.3 and 64.5 %, respectively. For LC A, sensitivity rose over the whole study period (p = 0.0055). As a result, no learning plateau was reached. In contrast, a learning plateau with no constant rise in sensitivity (p = 0.4667) was reached for LC B after 30 examined patients. The mean examination time for both observers was 7.9 min (±3.7). CONCLUSIONS: When being trained by an expert examiner, skills in RTE of the prostate can be obtained quickly. Performed by a trained examiner, the examination itself is little time-consuming. Thus, RTE represents a user- and patient-friendly tool that can easily be integrated into the day-to-day practice of urologists.

Real-time sonoelastography compared to magnetic resonance imaging using four different modalities at 3.0 T in the detection of prostate cancer: strength and weaknesses.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the results of RTE with four different modalities at 3.0 T using endorectal and body phased array coil in the detection of PC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between May 2009 and July 2010, 50 patients with biopsy proven PC scheduled for radical prostatectomy (RP) were examined. All patients underwent RTE of the prostate and 3.0 T endorectal MRI. The investigators were unaware of the clinical data and of each others results. RESULTS: RTE detected PC in 46 (92%) and MRI in 42 (84%) of the patients. Depending on the analysis sensitivity was 44.1-58.9% for RTE and 36.7-43.1% for MRI. Specificity was 83.0-74.8% for RTE and 85.9-79.8% for MRI. Sensitivity was significantly higher for RTE (16-sectors: p=0.0348; 8-sectors: p=0.0002) and showed better results in the dorsal (RTE: 51.9%; MRT: 37.7%) and apical to middle (RTE: 66.7%-80.0%; MRI: 41.7%-60.0%) parts of the prostate. MRI showed better results in the base (MRI: 19.4%; RTE: 14.9%) and transitional zone (TZ) (MRI: 34.7%; RTE: 29.6%). Concerning capsular involvement the results were comparable with sensitivity and specificity of RTE being 79.2% and 80.0% compared to 80.8% and 70.0% of MRI. CONCLUSIONS: Concerning sensitivity RTE showed advantages in apical and middle parts whereas MRI may provide advantages in the glands' base and TZ. Both RTE and MRI have limitations particularly in basal and ventral parts. Most of the undetected tumours were of low tumour volume and Gleason Score. Considering capsular involvement both techniques showed comparable results.

Radiation exposure during endourologic procedures using over-the-table fluoroscopy sources.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Fluoroscopy is used daily by endourologic surgeons worldwide without knowledge of received radiation doses. We wanted to assess the radiation exposure of endourologic surgeons by frequently performed endourologic interventions with an over-the-table x-ray system. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this prospective single-center study, 235 endourologic interventions in 188 patients from April to September 2010 were included. Sixty-seven ureteral stent placements (USP), 51 ureteral stent changes (USC), 67 percutaneous stent changes (PSC), 11 percutaneous nephrolithotomies (PCNL), and 39 ureterorenoscopies (URS) were performed by 12 surgeons. The surgeon`s radiation exposure was measured with one thermoluminescent dosimeter (TLD) at the forehead and one at the ring finger. TLDs were analyzed at a central institute. The radiation dose detected at the forehead was counted as representative for the lens of the eye and the thyroid. RESULTS: Mean patient age was 60.6 (± 18.8) years. Analysis of the TLD showed the following average values at the forehead for each intervention: USP and USC 0.04 mSv; PSC 0.03 mSv; PCNL 0.18 mSv; URS 0.1 mSv. Average finger values are: USP 0.13 mSv; USC 0.21 mSv; PSC 0.20 mSv; PCNL 4.36 mSv; URS 0.15 mSv. CONCLUSIONS: This report evaluates surgeons' radiation exposure by everyday endourologic interventions of different complexity. Most can be performed with an over-the-table x-ray system without exceeding statutory limits. Especially for PCNL, surgeons should consider possible protective action.

Annexin A3 in urine: a highly specific noninvasive marker for prostate cancer early detection.

PURPOSE: In prostate cancer cases the early diagnosis of tumors carrying a high risk of progression is of the utmost importance. There is an urgent clinical need to avoid unnecessary biopsies and subsequent overtreatment. We validated annexin A3 as a diagnostic marker for prostatic disease in typical clinical populations and relevant segments, such as patients with a negative digital rectal examination and low prostate specific antigen. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a blinded clinical study (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT00400894) from September 2005 to January 2007 in 591 patients who were continuously recruited from 4 European urological clinics. Urine was obtained directly after digital rectal examination and the annexin A3 concentration in urine was quantified by Western blot. Statistical analysis included combinations of annexin A3 with total, percent free, complexed and percent complexed prostate specific antigen. RESULTS: Combined readouts of prostate specific antigen and urinary annexin A3 were superior to all others with an area under the ROC curve of 0.82 for a total prostate specific antigen range of 2 to 6 ng/ml, 0.83 for a total prostate specific antigen range of 4 to 10 ng/ml and 0.81 in all patients. The best performing prostate specific antigen derivative was percent free prostate specific antigen with an area under the ROC curve of 0.68 for a total prostate specific antigen range of 2 to 6 ng/ml, 0.72 for a total prostate specific antigen range of 4 to 10 ng/ml and 0.73 in all patients. Annexin A3 has an inverse relationship to cancer and, therefore, its specificity was much better than that of prostate specific antigen. CONCLUSIONS: Annexin A3 quantification in urine provides a novel noninvasive biomarker with high specificity. Annexin A3 is complementary to prostate specific antigen or to any other cancer marker. It has a huge potential to avoid unnecessary biopsies with a particular strength in the clinically relevant large group of patients who have a negative digital rectal examination and prostate specific antigen in the lower range of values (2 to 10 ng/ml).

Clinical and pathological features of screen vs non-screen-detected prostate cancers: is there a difference?

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical and pathological characteristics of screen vs non-screen-detected prostate cancers, to determine if there is a difference in the same prostate-specific antigen (PSA) range. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In all, 997 patients who had had a radical prostatectomy were evaluated; 806 were Tyrolean screening volunteers, and 191 were from outside Tyrol, representing the 'referred prostate cancer' group. PSA level, age, prostate volume and pathological characteristics were assessed, as was the amount of over- and under-diagnosis. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences in patient age or PSA levels in the two groups. Even in the same PSA range there were statistically significantly more extraprostatic cancers in the referral group, at 31.7% and 17.4%, respectively. In the referred and screening groups there was over-diagnosis in 7.9% and 16.8%, and under-diagnosis in 40.8% and 27.8%, respectively. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that screening volunteers have a statistically significantly higher rate of organ-confined prostate cancers, and a statistically significantly lower rate of extracapsular extension and positive surgical margins than their counterparts in the referral group even in the same PSA range. As the pathological stage and surgical margin status are significant predictors of recurrence, these findings support the concept of PSA screening.

Development of a multiplexed urine assay for prostate cancer diagnosis.

BACKGROUND: Several studies have demonstrated the value of DNA methylation in urine-based assays for prostate cancer diagnosis. However, a multicenter validation with a clinical prototype has not been published. METHODS: We developed a multiplexed, quantitative methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction (MSP) assay consisting of 3 methylation markers, GSTP1, RARB, and APC, and an endogenous control, ACTB, in a closed-tube, homogeneous assay format. We tested this format with urine samples collected after digital rectal examination from 234 patients with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) concentrations > or =2.5 microg/L in 2 independent patient cohorts from 9 clinical sites. RESULTS: In the first cohort of 121 patients, we demonstrated 55% sensitivity and 80% specificity, with area under the curve (AUC) 0.69. In the second independent cohort of 113 patients, we found a comparable sensitivity of 53% and specificity of 76% (AUC 0.65). In the first cohort, as well as in a combined cohort, the MSP assay in conjunction with total PSA, digital rectal examination status, and age improved the AUC without MSP, although the difference was not statistically significant. Importantly, the GSTP1 cycle threshold value demonstrated a good correlation (R = 0.84) with the number of cores found to contain prostate cancer or premalignant lesions on biopsy. Moreover, samples that exhibited methylation for either GSTP1 or RARB typically contained higher tumor volumes at prostatectomy than those samples that did not exhibit methylation. CONCLUSIONS: These data confirm and extend previously reported studies and demonstrate the performance of a clinical prototype assay that should aid urologists in identifying men who should undergo biopsy.

Tyrol Prostate Cancer Demonstration Project: early detection, treatment, outcome, incidence and mortality.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of a well-controlled programme of early detection and treatment of prostate cancer in the population of Tyrol, Austria, where such a programme of early detection and treatment was initiated in 1988 and where prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing was offered for free to all men aged 45-75 years from 1993. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Comparison of prostate cancer mortality rates in Tyrol and the rest of Austria was accomplished through a generalized additive model. A piecewise linear change-point Poisson regression model was used to compare mortality rates in Tyrol and the rest of Austria. Standardized mortality ratios were calculated with reference to the mortality rates in 1986-1990. RESULTS: In all, 86.6% of eligible men have been tested at least once since 1993. Cancer deaths in Tyrol in 2005 were 54% (95% confidence interval [CI] 34-69%) lower than expected compared with 29% (95% CI 22-35%) in the rest of Austria. The decreasing trend in prostate cancer mortality was significantly greater in Tyrol compared with the rest of Austria (P = 0.001). A significant migration to lower stage disease occurred and radical prostatectomy was associated with low morbidity. CONCLUSIONS: In the Tyrol region where treatment is freely available to all patients, where widespread PSA testing and treatment with curative intent occurs, there was a reduction in prostate cancer mortality rates which was significantly greater than the reduction in the rest of Austria. This reduction in prostate cancer mortality is most probably due to early detection, consequent down-staging and effective treatment of prostate cancer.

Pathological features of Gleason score 6 prostate cancers in the low and intermediate range of prostate-specific antigen level: is there a difference?

OBJECTIVE: To assess the pathological features of Gleason score 6 prostate cancers after radical prostatectomy in the low (<4 ng/mL) and intermediate range of prostate-specific antigen level (4-10 ng/mL), as such prostate cancers are considered to be well differentiated tumours with a low risk for recurrence after therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In all, 1354 patients with T1c prostate cancer and PSA levels of <10.0 ng/mL had a radical retropubic prostatectomy. Patients with Gleason score 6 tumours were divided into two groups, those with PSA levels of <4 and 4.0-10.0 ng/mL. Extracapsular extension, positive surgical margins, biochemical recurrence (BCR) and mean time to BCR were evaluated. RESULTS: Of the 1354 patients, there were 437 (32.3%) with Gleason score 6 prostate cancers. Patients in the low PSA group had less extraprostatic disease than those with a higher level (5.9% vs 14.5%) and both groups had an almost equal proportion of positive surgical margins (9.4% vs 11.0%). In the low PSA group there was statistically significantly shorter BCR than in the high PSA group, with a mean time to BCR of 1.7 vs 3.1 years. CONCLUSIONS: These results show a statistically significantly higher rate of extraprostatic disease and earlier BCR in men with a high than a low PSA level even in Gleason score 6 prostate cancer. As the rate of BCR and extracapsular extension are significantly related to prostate cancer mortality, these findings further support the concept of screening using low PSA levels.