Daily Versus Weekly Prostate Cancer Image Guided Radiation Therapy: Phase 3 Multicenter Randomized Trial.

PURPOSE: The optimal frequency of prostate cancer image guided radiation therapy (IGRT) has not yet been clearly identified. This study sought to compare the safety and efficacy of daily versus weekly IGRT. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This phase 3 randomized trial recruited patients with N0 localized prostate cancer. The total IGRT doses in the prostate ranged from 70 Gy to 80 Gy, sparing the lymph nodes. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to 2 prostate IGRT frequency groups: daily and weekly (ie, on days 1, 2, and 3 and then weekly). The primary outcome was 5-year recurrence-free survival. Secondary outcomes included overall survival and toxicity. Post hoc analyses included biochemical progression-free interval, clinical progression-free interval, and other cancer-free interval. RESULTS: Between June 2007 and November 2012, 470 men from 21 centers were randomized into the 2 groups. Median follow-up was 4.1 years. There was no statistically significant difference in recurrence-free survival between the groups (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.81; P = .330). Overall survival was worse in the daily group than in the weekly group (HR = 2.12 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.03-4.37]; P = .042). Acute rectal bleeding (grade ≥1) was significantly lower in the daily group (6%) (n = 14) than in the weekly group (11%) (n = 26) (P = .014). Late rectal toxicity (grade ≥1) was significantly lower in the daily group (HR = 0.71 [95% CI, 0.53-0.96]; P = .027). Biochemical progression-free interval (HR = 0.45 [95% CI, 0.25 - 0.80]; P = .007) and clinical progression-free interval (HR = 0.50 [95% CI, 0.24-1.02]; P = .057) were better in the daily group, whereas other cancer-free interval was worse in the daily group (HR = 2.21 [95% CI, 1.10-4.44]; P = .026). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with weekly control, daily IGRT control in prostate cancer significantly improves biochemical progression-free and clinical progression-free interval, and rectal toxicity.

Cost of prostate image-guided radiation therapy: results of a randomized trial.

PURPOSE: This cost analysis aimed to quantify the cost of IGRT in relation to IGRT frequency and modality with Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) or orthogonal electronic portal imaging with fiducial markers (EPI-FM). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients undergoing IGRT for localized prostate cancer were randomized into two prostate control frequencies (daily or weekly). Costs were calculated based on the micro-costing results according to hospitals' perspectives (in Euros, 2009) and the time horizon was radiation therapy. RESULTS: A total of 208 patients were enrolled in seven French cancer centers. A total of 6865 fractions were individually analyzed. The mean total treatment fraction duration was 21.0 min for daily CBCT and 18.3 min for daily EPI-FM. Increasing the control frequency from weekly to daily increased the mean treatment fraction duration by 7.3 min (+53%) for CBCT and 1.7 min (+10%) for EPI-FM (p ≤ 0.01). The mean additional cost per patient of daily controls compared with weekly controls was €679 and €187 for CBCT and EPI-FM, respectively (p<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The incremental costs due to different prostate IGRT strategies are relatively moderate, suggesting that daily IGRT combined with intensity-modulated RT (IMRT) could be administered in cases of high-dose radiation delivery to the prostate.

[Anticancer drugs off label used of: what do the experts think about?]. / Prescriptions hors AMM en cancérologie: qu'en pensent les experts?

Anticancer drugs off label used in Tenon hospital were analysed by a panel of 12 experts not working at Tenon hospital. They distinguished 3 groups of off-label prescribing according to scientific evidence, labelling anticancer drugs alternative in presence and patient's characteristics: justified off label used (62%), unjustified off label used (26%) and prescriptions for which no consensus had been reached between the experts (12%). Nineteen per cent of unjustified off label used had labelling alternative and 7% did not have anticancer drugs labelling alternative. Questions who experts had to answer to analyse drugs prescribing could be systematically asked when a chemotherapy is prescribed. It could allowed to take into account scientific, economic and ethical requirements. This method proposed by the local drug committee could be used to regulate economic resources and to justify financing of some expensive anticancer drugs.

[Anticancer drugs use evaluation: limits of the approved labeling]. / Evaluation du bon usage des anticancéreux: les limites des indications AMM.

A practice survey was performed in Tenon hospital on 396 consecutive patients treated for solid tumors during 4 weeks in november 2002. 33% of anticancer drugs were off label used. The wording heterogeneity of the different anticancer drugs approved labeling and the lack of anticancer drugs in a number of cancers can explain those results. On one hand, randomised comparative clinical trial, considered as the best level of evidence to obtain a label used, is not always possible in cancerology, especially for rare tumors. One the other hand, pharmaceutical firm are not obliged to asked a label used for an anticancer drugs in spite of high level of evidence. So, label used can not be the own references for anticancer drugs prescribing, therapeutic advanced can be realised and disseminated before their taking into account in the label used.

Monitoring of residual hematopoiesis after total body irradiation in humans as a model for accidental x-ray exposure: dose-effect and failure of ex vivo expansion of residual stem cells in view of autografting.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the residual hematopoiesis at different levels of total body irradiation (TBI) dose in bone marrow (BM) and peripheral blood (PB), and to study the dose-effect relationship on hematopoietic immature and mature progenitors. We also investigated the possibility of expanding ex vivo the residual progenitors exposed to different dose levels of TBI. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Eight patients treated for AML (n = 3) and myeloma (n = 5) were included. BM and PB samples were harvested before TBI and after doses of: 5 Gy. Mononuclear cells (MNCs) were assayed for burst-forming unit erythroid (BFU-E), granulocyte-forming unit macrophage (CFU-GM), and long-term culture initiating cells (LTC-ICs). Ex vivo expansion: MNCs (after irradiation and controls) were suspended in long-term cultures and expanded with a combination of five cytokines. RESULTS: CD34+ cells were detectable at 10 Gy. We observed a significant decrease of CFU-GM and BFU-E, respectively, to 13.5% and 8.5% of baseline values for doses

Results of definitive irradiation in a series of 305 epidermoid carcinomas of the anal canal.

PURPOSE: To evaluate our data concerning the prognostic factors for locoregional control, survival, late complications, and sphincter conservation in a series of epidermoid cancers of the anal canal without clinical evidence of metastasis. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between June 1972 and January 1997, 305 patients were treated with curative-intent radiotherapy (RT). The T stage according to the 1987 International Union Against Cancer classification was T1 in 26, T2 in 141, T3 in 104, and T4 in 34. Forty-nine patients had nodal involvement at presentation. The pretreatment anal function score, according to our in-house system, was 0 for 22 patients, 1 for 182, 2 for 74, 3 for 7, and 4 for 11 patients; for 9 patients, scores were unavailable. The treatment started with external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) in 303 patients (median dose 45 Gy). After a rest period of 4-6 weeks, a boost of 20 Gy was delivered by EBRT in 279 patients and by interstitial (192)Ir brachytherapy in 17 patients. Seven patients received only one course of EBRT (mean dose 49.5 Gy), and 2 patients were treated with interstitial (192)Ir brachytherapy alone (55 Gy and 60 Gy). Concomitant chemotherapy (5-fluorouracil and either mitomycin C or cisplatin) was delivered to 19 patients. The mean follow-up was 103 months (median 84). RESULTS: At the end of RT, the local tumor clinical complete response rate was 96% for T1, 87% for T2, 79% for T3, and 44% for T4. Of the 61 locally progressive tumors, 27 (44%) were salvaged with abdominoperineal resection. The rate of local tumor relapse was 12%. Among 37 local tumor relapses, 20 (54%) were salvaged with abdominoperineal resection and one with interstitial (192)Ir brachytherapy. The overall local control rate (with or without salvage local therapy) was 84%. The local control rate with good anal function (score 0 or 1) was 56.5%. Of 181 available patients with their anus preserved, 94% had good anal function. For a subgroup of 15 patients with a tumor length of <2 cm and without nodal involvement, the clinical complete response rate after RT completion was 100%, the local control rate with or without local salvage treatment was 100%, and among 13 available patients with their anus preserved, the anal function score was good in 12 patients (92%). The 10-year disease-free survival rate was 74%. After multivariate analysis, three independent predictive factors significantly influenced disease-free survival: the interval between the two courses of RT (>38 days vs. < or =38 days, p = 0.0025), pretreatment anal function score (0 vs. 1 vs. 2 vs. 3 vs. 4, p = 4.4.10(-6)), and clinical complete response after RT completion (no complete response vs. complete response, p = 2.5.10(-14)). CONCLUSION: We confirm the excellent results with RT in T1 and T2 lesions. However, to improve survival without colostomy with good anal sphincter function, chemoradiotherapy should be preferred for tumors > or =2 cm in length and for locally advanced tumors.