The use of radioactive iodine-125 seed localization in patients with non-palpable breast cancer: a comparison with the radioguided occult lesion localization with 99m technetium.

BACKGROUND: Radioactive Seed Localization with a radioactive iodine-125 seed (RSL) and Radioguided Occult Lesion Localization with 99mTechnetium colloid (ROLL) are both attractive alternatives to wire localization for guiding breast conserving surgery (BCS) of non-palpable breast cancer. The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the efficacy of RSL and ROLL. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 387 patients with unifocal non-palpable ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) or invasive carcinoma treated with BCS at the Netherlands Cancer Institute. In total 403 non-palpable lesions were localized either by RSL (N = 128) or by ROLL (N = 275). Primary outcome measures were positive margins and re-excision rates; the secondary outcome measure was weight of the specimen. RESULTS: Pre-operative mammography or ultrasound showed similar sizes of DCIS and invasive tumours in both RSL and ROLL groups. In the RSL group, more lesions were DCIS (58%) than in the ROLL group, where 32% of the lesions were pure DCIS. The proportions of focally positive margins (11% vs. 10%) and more than focally positive margins (9% vs. 9%) were comparable between the RSL and the ROLL group, resulting in the same re-excision rate in both RSL and ROLL groups (9% vs. 10%). For DCIS lesions, the specimen weight was significantly lower in the RSL group than in the ROLL group after adjusting for tumour size on mammography (12 g; 95% CI 2.6-21). CONCLUSION: Margin status and re-excision rates were comparable for RSL and ROLL in patients with non-palpable breast lesions. Because of the significant lower weight of the resected specimen in DCIS, the feasibility of position verification of the I-125 seed and more convenient logistics, we favour RSL over ROLL to guide breast-conserving therapy.

Fully automated deformable registration of breast DCE-MRI and PET/CT.

Accurate characterization of breast tumors is important for the appropriate selection of therapy and monitoring of the response. For this purpose breast imaging and tissue biopsy are important aspects. In this study, a fully automated method for deformable registration of DCE-MRI and PET/CT of the breast is presented. The registration is performed using the CT component of the PET/CT and the pre-contrast T1-weighted non-fat suppressed MRI. Comparable patient setup protocols were used during the MRI and PET examinations in order to avoid having to make assumptions of biomedical properties of the breast during and after the application of chemotherapy. The registration uses a multi-resolution approach to speed up the process and to minimize the probability of converging to local minima. The validation was performed on 140 breasts (70 patients). From a total number of registration cases, 94.2% of the breasts were aligned within 4.0 mm accuracy (1 PET voxel). Fused information may be beneficial to obtain representative biopsy samples, which in turn will benefit the treatment of the patient.

The impact of preoperative MRI on breast-conserving surgery of invasive cancer: a comparative cohort study.

AIM: To assess whether preoperative contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the breast influences the rate of incomplete tumor excision. METHODS: In a cohort of 349 women with invasive breast cancer, patients eligible for breast-conserving therapy (BCT) on the basis of conventional imaging and palpation only (N = 176) were compared to those who had an additional preoperative MRI (N = 173). Multivariate analysis was applied to explore associations with incomplete tumor excision. RESULTS: MRI detected larger extent of breast cancer in 19 women (11.0%), leading to treatment change: mastectomy (8.7%) or wider excision (2.3%). Tumor excision was incomplete in 22/159 (13.8%) wide local excisions in the MRI group and in 35/180 (19.4%) in the non-MRI group (P = 0.17). Stratified to tumor type, incompletely excised infiltrating ductal carcinoma (IDC) was significantly associated with absence of MRI: 11/136 (8.1%) versus 2/126 (1.6%) (MRI present) (P = 0.02). No significant factors explained incomplete excision of other tumor types. CONCLUSION: Preoperative MRI did not significantly affect the overall rate of incomplete tumor excision, but it yielded significantly lower rate of incompletely excised IDC. The reduction of incomplete excisions after MRI was smaller than the rate of a prior treatment change incurred by MRI.