The internal structure of Brazilian versions of disability questionnaires in patients with chronic low back pain: A cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: Structural validity refers to the degree to which the scores of a questionnaire or scale are an adequate reflection of the construct to be measured. The aim of this study was to perform the analysis of the structural validity of the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale (QBPDS), and Bournemouth Questionnaire (BQ) in Brazilian respondents with chronic low back pain. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted. The sample was composed by respondents with non-specific chronic low back pain (score ≥3 points on the 11-point Numerical Pain Rating Scale). The internal structure (number of domains and items) of the Brazilian versions of the RMDQ, the ODI, the QBPDS, and the BQ were analyzed by the confirmatory factor analysis. RESULTS: Two hundred and twenty-two patients were included. Most of the sample consisted of women and overweight. The RMDQ and ODI have a one-dimensional structure and acceptable values for all confirmatory factor analysis fit indices. The QBPDS with 4 domains and 20 items showed the best values of the fit indices. In addition, we did not identify an internal structure for the BQ supported by the confirmatory factor analysis. CONCLUSION: The ODI and RMDQ present valid internal structure with 1 domain (disability). The QBPDS has a valid internal structure with 4 domains (rest, prolonged postures, ambulation/reach, and bending/carrying). The BQ does not have a well-defined internal structure.

Association of photobiomodulation therapy (PBMT) and exercises programs in pain and functional capacity of patients with knee osteoarthritis (KOA): a systematic review of randomized trials.

Knee osteoarthritis (KOA) is a common degenerative disease in which several treatments and treatment associations have been investigated. This review analyzed the efficacy of the association of photobiomodulation therapy (PBMT) and exercises for people with KOA in randomized controlled clinical trials. PubMed, Scopus, and EMBASE databases were searched using the following terms: "knee osteoarthritis," "laser," "low-level laser," "photobiomodulation," "phototherapy," and "exercise." Seven RCT studies involving humans that examined PBMT treatment in association with were found. Most studies used mainly near-infrared PBMT irradiation, with a fluence ranging from 610 mJ/cm2 to 200 J/cm2, 23.55 J to 2400 J total energy per knee, and number of treatment sessions from 10 to 24. In addition, all the protocols included exercises to increase lower limb muscle strength that were performed alone or in association with other types of exercises. However, only 2 studies, considered as a high quality, showed the additional effect of PBMT (lower doses) on an exercise program (involving warming-up, motor learning, balance coordination and strengthening exercises, and stretching) for improvement of pain and functional capacity in people with KOA. This review demonstrates that there is a controversy on the effects PBMT associated with exercises for pain and functional capacity improvement for people with KOA, because there is a heterogeneity between studies in related to PBMT parameters, as dose, number of therapy sessions and the type of PBMT (either LLLT and HILT), and the exercise protocols proposed.

Assessment of the Reliability of the Leg Lateral Reach Test to Measure Thoraco-Lumbo-Pelvic Rotation in Individuals With Chronic Low Back Pain.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the intrarater and interrater reliability of the Leg Lateral Reach Test (LLRT) to measure the mobility of the thoraco-lumbo-pelvic segment in individuals with nonspecific chronic low back and the correlations among pain intensity, kinesiophobia, and LLRT scores. METHODS: Thirty participants with nonspecific chronic low back pain were selected. The main variables were LLRT, pain intensity (measured with the Numeric Pain Rating Scale) and kinesiophobia (Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia). The reliability of the LLRT was evaluated by means of intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), standard error of measurement (SEM), minimum detectable change. RESULTS: Most participants were women (83.3%), young adults (mean = 30.86; standard deviation = 8.56), with overweight and nonspecific chronic low back for more than 59 months of duration. In the intrarater analysis, we observed reliability values ranging from substantial to excellent (ICC ≥ .889; SEM ≤ 7.97%). In the interrater analysis, we observed excellent reliability (ICC ≥ .947; SEM ≤ 5.62%). There was a weak and positive correlation between pain and LLRT, and no correlation between kinesiophobia and LLRT. CONCLUSION: LLRT is a reliable test to measure thoraco-lumbo-pelvic rotation in individuals with nonspecific chronic low back pain.