Long term clinical outcomes in DES implantation for unprotected left main disease.

AIM: Generate a long term follow-up and evaluate the impact of clinical and procedural characteristics on long term events in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation for unprotected left main coronary artery (ULMCA) disease. METHODS: Ninety-seven consecutive patients who underwent PCI with DES, either sirolimus (SES) or paclitaxel-eluting stent (PES), for de novo lesions in ULMCA were analyzed. No patients were excluded. Mean follow-up was 3 years (range 1-6.7 years). RESULTS: Technical and procedural success rate were 100% and 95.9%. According to the Academic Research Consortium definitions, cardiac death occurred in 6.1% of patients, reinfarction, target vessel revascularization (TVR) and target lesion revascularization (TLR) occurred in 6.1%, 17.5% and 4.2% of patients respectively. Definite stent thrombosis (ST) incidence was 1%, whereas possible ST occurred in 4.2% of patients. Postdilation was performed in 49.5% of patients and was, among all clinical and procedural characteristics, the only factor at multivariate analysis significantly related to lower MACE (25% vs. 46.9%, P=0.024, CI: 0.202 to 0.889) and TVR (8.3% vs. 26.5%, P=0.03 CI: 0.096-0.895). CONCLUSION: Long term follow-up in PCI of ULMCA disease shows favorable clinical results. Stent postdilation seems to have a protective role in DES PCI for ULMCA disease.

Effects of EPC capture stent and CD34+ mobilization in acute myocardial infarction.

AIM: Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is the gold standard for the treatment of acute myocardial infarction (AMI), with the main limitation of in-stent restenosis for BMS and late stent thrombosis (ST) for both BMS and DES. Endothelial progenitor cells (EPC) CD34+ capture stents, promoting vascular healing, may be advantageous in preventing ST. Aim of the study is to evaluate the outcomes of AMI patients treated with EPC CD34+ capture stent and describe the mobilization kinetics of CD34+ and their clinical correlation. METHODS: Fifty AMI patients underwent primary PCI with EPC CD34+ capture stent. Serial assays of CD34+ were performed by flow-cytometric analysis. RESULTS: Procedural success rate was 100%. At six-months follow-up cardiac death, myocardial infarction, target lesion revascularization (TLR) and target vessel revascularization (TVR) occurred respectively in 2%, 4%, 10% and 12% of patients. No case of ST was observed. The MACE-free survival was 81,2%. The mean peak value of plasmatic CD34+ was 4.69±3.76 cells/µL. A positive correlation was found between CD34+ concentration, age and infarct area. No correlation was detected between CD34+ concentration and occurrence of TVR, TLR and MACE. CONCLUSION: EPC capture stent implantation seems to be safe and effective in the clinical setting of AMI, representing a possible alternative to BMS and DES. CD34+ cells plasmatic concentration seems not to correlate to coronary restenosis and atheromasic disease progression.

Rationale and results of percutaneous coronary revascularization with endothelial progenitor cell capture stent in high-risk patients requiring undeferrable non-cardiac surgery.

AIM: Drug eluting stents (DES) are currently the gold standard for the treatment of significant coronary artery stenosis in high risk patients. In case of undeferrable non-cardiac surgery their use is still a challenge, due to the need of a prolonged dual antiplatelet therapy. We aimed to prospectively evaluate the efficacy and safety of the implantation of endothelial progenitor cells (EPC) capture stent followed by a short dual anti-platelet therapy (DAT) period in a high risk population of patients undergoing undeferrable non-cardiac surgery. METHODS: We examined all consecutive patients who received EPCs capture stents and underwent non-cardiac surgery within 60 days of percutaneous coronary intervention. Our primary outcome was the occurrences of cardiac death, myocardial infarction (MI), stent thrombosis (ST), target vessel revascularization (TVR) and major adverse cardiac events (MACE). RESULTS: Twenty-six patients underwent PCI and were enrolled, but only 20 underwent surgical intervention. Technical and procedural success rates were both 100%. No perioperative MACE was detected. After a mean long term follow-up of 15.4±10.3 months, 2 cases of cardiac death (10%), were recorded. No case of stent thrombosis was reported; no case of ischemia driven TLR was detected. The total MACE-free survival probability was 66.5%. CONCLUSION: EPC capture stent implantation in high-risk patients requiring undeferrable non-cardiac surgery seems to allow early cand safe discontinuation of DAT, and may be an attractive alternative to conventional stents.

Role of whole body positron emission tomography/computed tomography scan with 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose in patients with biopsy proven tumor metastases from unknown primary site.

AIM: The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of whole body PET/CT scan with (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) in the detection of the primary tumor in patients with metastatic cancer from unknown primary origin (CUP syndrome). METHODS: Sixty-eight consecutive patients, with CUP syndrome (39 lymph nodes, 29 visceral biopsy proven tumor metastases), underwent a whole-body FDG-PET/CT study. All enrolled patients were unsuccessfully studied, within the previous month, with physical examination, laboratory tests and conventional diagnostic procedures. All the pathological findings identified at PET/CT scan and suspected for primaries, were further investigated. After PET study, the minimum follow-up period for the inclusion in the studied population was 3 months. RESULTS: The primary tumor site was correctly identified by FDG-PET/CT in 24 patients (24/68, 35.3%): lung (n=9), rino/oro-pharynx (n=6), pancreas (n=5), colon (n=2), uterus (n=2). In 5 cases, FDG-PET scan did not identify a primary pathological focus, which was subsequently detected by other diagnostic methods within 3 months. In 39 patients (39/68, 57.4%), the primary tumor site was not localized. However, in 9 of them, FDG-PET/CT scan identified further unexpected metastases, modifying the stage of disease. Overall, the following oncological treatment was influenced by the PET scan, in a total of 33 patients (33/68, 48.5%). CONCLUSIONS: Our data strongly support the diagnostic contribution of whole body FDG-PET/CT scan in the evaluation of patients with CUP syndrome and suggest its use in an early phase of the diagnostic iter to optimize patient management.