Encapsulating peritoneal sclerosis: Your questions answered.

Encapsulating peritoneal sclerosis (EPS) is a clinical syndrome hallmarked by the formation of a fibrous cocoon encapsulating the bowel resulting in morbidity and mortality. EPS is most frequently associated with peritoneal dialysis (PD), particularly with its discontinuation. While EPS is one of the most feared complications of PD, the majority of patients receiving PD will not go on to develop EPS. Risk factors for development include time on PD, some types of peritonitis and discontinuation of PD. Owing to its rarity, much of the knowledge of EPS comes from case series and registries and treatments are extrapolated from low-quality evidence. Malnutrition is a significant driver of mortality, and nutritional support is critical in management. We present a case of EPS and frequently asked questions including the definition, diagnosis, epidemiology, pathophysiology, risk factors, role of infection, management and roles of nutrition and surgery.

The impact of amino acid dialysate on anthropometric measures in adult patients on peritoneal dialysis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Glucose-containing dialysate underpins peritoneal dialysis (PD) therapy. However, its use is associated with amino acid loss in the dialysis effluent, a risk factor for protein-energy wasting (PEW) in PD patients. Amino acid-based dialysis solutions (AAD) may ameliorate this loss. However, the evidence of clinical benefit in preventing PEW is unclear. The aim of this review was to assess the effect of AAD versus standard dialysis solutions (STD) on anthropometric measures and serum albumin. METHODS: Studies up until 30 September 2020 were identified from databases including MEDLINE and Embase, using a prespecified protocol (PROSPERO - CRD42020209581). Studies evaluating adults on PD were included. Data pertaining to muscle mass (primary outcome), other anthropometric measures and serum albumin were extracted. A meta-analysis of the eligible studies was conducted. RESULTS: A total of 6945 abstracts were reviewed, from which 14 studies (9 randomised and 5 non-randomised) were included. There was no significant difference in any of the anthropometric measures, between AAD and STD during follow-up. Serum albumin at 6 months was statistically lower with AAD compared to STD [mean difference = -0.89 (95%CI -1.77 to -0.01, p = 0.046)]. The quality of evidence was graded low for each outcome. CONCLUSIONS: AAD may not alter anthropometric measures when compared to STD. The impact on serum albumin is uncertain, with an estimated difference that is unlikely to be of clinical value. These findings should be cautiously interpreted due to low quality of the evidence. Robust studies are needed to address the limitations in evidence.

Breast cancer screening in women with mental illness: comparative meta-analysis of mammography uptake.

BACKGROUND: There is a higher mortality rate due to cancer in people with mental illness and previous work suggests suboptimal medical care in this population. It remains unclear if this extends to breast cancer population screening. AIMS: To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to establish if women with a mental health condition are less likely to receive mammography screening compared with those without mental ill health. METHOD: Major electronic databases were searched from inception until February 2014. We calculated odds ratios (OR) with a random effects meta-analysis comparing mammography screening rates among women with and without a mental illness. Results were stratified according to primary diagnosis including any mental illness, mood disorders, depression, severe mental illness (SMI), distress and anxiety. RESULTS: We identified 24 publications reporting breast cancer screening practices in women with mental illness (n = 715,705). An additional 5 studies investigating screening for those with distress (n = 21,491) but no diagnosis of mental disorder were identified. The pooled meta-analysis showed significantly reduced rates of mammography screening in women with mental illness (OR = 0.71, 95% CI 0.66-0.77), mood disorders (OR = 0.83, 95% CI 0.76-0.90) and particularly SMI (OR = 0.54, 95% CI 0.45-0.65). No disparity was evident among women with distress alone. CONCLUSIONS: Rates of mammography screening are lower in women with mental illness, particularly women with SMI, and this is not explained by the presence of emotional distress. Disparities in medical care due to mental illness clearly extend into preventive population screening.