Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Healthc Qual Res ; 36(4): 200-210, 2021.
Artigo em Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33985918

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Cardiovascular surgery (CCV) patients have a high incidence of perioperative anemia and bleeding that determines a high rate of allogeneic blood transfusion (AST). This is associated with an increase in morbidity, mortality and prolongs length of stay in hospital. Unnecessary transfusion is one of the measures to avoid and Patient Blood Management (PBM) programs have proven their effectiveness. Our objective was to reduce the transfusion of patients in cardiac surgery, without inferior results in morbidity and mortality, length of stay in hospital and being cost-effective, through the implementation of a PBM program. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A mixed cohort study of 226 patients divided into 2 groups: retrospective pre-PBM (GP), from 2016, and intervention group (IG), prospective from 2018, with the results of the implementation of the guide. RESULTS: The clinical results obtained allowed reducing the TSA from 92.59% to 79.69% (P<.001), saving 2.59 units of CH and 2.5 of PFC per patient (P<.001). A decrease was found in patients with fever (12.35% vs 1.56% with P=.006) and the need to escalate antibiotics (64.8% vs 42.19%, P=.002). The rest of postoperative complications and mortality at 3months did not present statistically significant differences. The length of stay was reduced by an average 3.6days in the IG, (95%CI: -8.10 to 0.9, P=.18). The cost decreased by 163.29€ per patient, taking into account exclusively the saving of blood components. CONCLUSION: The PBM program is effective in reducing TSA in cardiac surgery in a tertiary hospital with high complexity patients and high transfusion rate. There are signs suggestive of a decrease in infections and a tendency to decrease the length of stay and mortality. In the economic approximation carried out, the cost of the intervention was lower than the savings implied by the decrease in transfusion.


Assuntos
Transfusão de Sangue , Estudos de Coortes , Humanos , Estudos Prospectivos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Centros de Atenção Terciária
2.
Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim ; 63(9): 519-527, 2016 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês, Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27418334

RESUMO

In April 2013 the Ministry of Health (MSSSI) adopted the project called "Commitment to Quality by Scientific Societies in Spain", in response to social and professional demands for sustainability of the health system. The initiative is part of the activities of the Spanish Network of Agencies for Health Technology Assessment and Services of the National Health System, and is coordinated jointly by the Quality and Cohesion Department, the Aragon Institute of Health Sciences (IACS), and the Spanish Society of Internal Medicine (SEMI). All the scientific societies in Spain have been included in this project, and its main objective is to reduce the unnecessary use of health interventions in order to agree "do not do" recommendations, based on scientific evidence. The primary objective was to identify interventions that have not proven effective, have limited or doubtful effectiveness, are not cost-effective, or do not have priority. Secondary objectives were: reducing variability in clinical practice, to spread information between doctors and patients to guide decision-making, the appropriate use of health resources and, the promotion of clinical safety and reducing iatrogenesis. The selection process of the 5 "do not do" recommendations was made by Delphi methodology. A total of 25 panellists (all anaesthesiologists) chose between 15 proposals based on: evidence that supports quality, relevance, or clinical impact, and the people they affect. The 5 recommendations proposed were: Do not maintain deep levels of sedation in critically ill patients without a specific indication; Do not perform preoperative chest radiography in patients under 40 years-old with ASA physical status I or II; Do not systematically perform preoperative tests in cataract surgery unless otherwise indicated based on clinical history and physical examination; Do not perform elective surgery in patients with anaemia at risk of bleeding until a diagnostic workup is performed and treatment is given; and not perform laboratory tests (blood count, biochemistry and coagulation) prior to surgery in healthy or low risk patients (ASA I and II) with minimal estimated blood loss.


Assuntos
Anestesiologia , Cuidados Críticos , Sociedades Científicas , Humanos , Dor , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde , Espanha
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...