Application of Fat Grafting in Cosmetic Breast Surgery.

The role of fat grafting to the breasts has evolved in the recent past, gaining several new applications within both reconstructive and aesthetic surgery. Initially used for reconstructive purposes to fill lumpectomy defects or to correct residual contour deformities after breast reconstruction, it has since made its way into cosmetic breast surgery and has grown to encompass a wide variety of new indications. Fat grafting in aesthetic breast surgery may be performed as a form of primary autologous breast augmentation or as an adjunct to implant-based breast augmentation to disguise implant edges. It may also be used to provide added volume after explant surgery or to provide improvements in breast contour alongside mastopexy techniques. In this article, we will review the current applications of fat grafting in aesthetic breast surgery and provide an up-to-date summary of its reported outcomes, safety, and complications.

Access to Multidisciplinary Care for Patients With 22q11.2 Deletion Syndrome: Identifying Breakdowns in the Screening Process.

The 22q11.2 deletion syndrome affects approximately 1 in 4000 live births and involves cardiac defects, immunodeficiency, and endocrine disruption. The complexity of diagnosis and multifaceted care often leads to fragmented management in the short and long term. With the purpose of developing an effective multidisciplinary program, the authors aimed to identify the deficiencies in current screening and referral processes among the teams required in the care for patients with 22q11.2 deletion syndrome. A retrospective chart review was conducted at our institution between 2001 and 2016. Patients with confirmed 22q11.2 deletion diagnoses between the ages of 0 and 28 were included. A list of 15 relevant specialties that should evaluate patients with 22q11.2 deletion syndrome was created according to established guidelines. Patient medical and demographic information were collected and analyzed. A total of 270 patients were included. Mean age at diagnosis was 3.3 years. On average, patients visited 6 of 15 departments (1-14). Only 8.8% of patients visited >10 specialties. The majority were seen by Cardiology, Allergy and Immunology, Genetics, and Speech (57.4-87.8%). A minority were seen by Hematology and Oncology, Sleep Therapy, and Physical Therapy (13.3-16.3%). Only 34.1% encountered plastic surgery. Negative correlation (-0.128; P = 0.035) was demonstrated between patients' age at diagnosis and number of specialty teams encountered. This study highlights the current underutilization of services required to manage patients with 22q11.2 deletion syndrome. While screening guidelines have been established, implementation can be challenging as it requires efficient care coordination between teams. Moving forward, the authors believe that a multidisciplinary clinical approach to streamline patient care is necessary.

The Utility of an Open-Access Surgical Simulator to Enhance Surgeon Training.

BACKGROUND: Smile Train, an international children's charity committed to improving cleft care around the world, empowers local medical professionals in developing countries to provide quality comprehensive cleft care in their own communities. As part of their sustainable model, Smile Train developed a web-based, interactive virtual simulator to improve surgical training of cleft procedures for surgeons around the world, replicating the anatomical and technical steps involved in cleft surgery. This study evaluated the simulator as a tool for enhancing surgical training. METHODS: A pre-test and questionnaire addressing cleft care, surgical knowledge, and confidence level was administered to surgeons-in-training at an academic institution. Participants completed 3 simulator modules followed by a post-test and questionnaire to measure changes in knowledge and confidence levels. RESULTS: Sixteen surgeons-in-training participated in this study. The mean score on the knowledge examination increased after reviewing the modules for both junior residents (33.1%-64.4%) and senior residents (46.9%-70.8%). Reviewing the modules increased participants' confidence in the knowledge of cleft anatomy, understanding of surgical procedures, and ability to follow along meaningfully while assisting in operations. CONCLUSIONS: The Smile Train Virtual Surgery Simulator increased knowledge and reported surgeon confidence in understanding and assisting in cleft lip surgery, signifying its usefulness as a training tool for surgeons-in-training. Virtual simulation is a valuable resource for improving understanding and competence of the craniofacial surgeon while serving as an educational resource to other members of the comprehensive cleft care team, patients, and families.