Incidence and Outcomes of Cytomegalovirus Reactivation after Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cell Therapy.

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) reactivation is a major complication among seropositive allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) recipients; however, data regarding CMV reactivation after chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR T) cell therapy are limited. In this single-center retrospective study, we report the incidence and outcomes of 95 adult CMV seropositive patients who received CAR T cell therapy between February 2018 and February 2023. CMV outcomes were CMV reactivation (any viremia) and clinically significant CMV infection (cs-CMV, viremia requiring antiviral treatment). Thirty-one patients (33%) had evidence of CMV reactivation (any viremia), and 10 patients (11%) had cs-CMV. The median time from CAR T cell infusion to CMV reactivation was 19 days (IQR, 9-31). The cumulative incidence of CMV (any viremia) was significantly higher among patients with grade 3-4 cytokine release syndrome (67 vs. 28%; P=0.01), and those who received corticosteroids (39 vs. 21%; P=0.03), anakinra (56 vs. 28%; P=0.02), or ≥2 immunosuppressants (41 vs. 21%; P=0.02). Receipt of corticosteroids (18 vs. 0%; P=0.004), tocilizumab (14 vs. 0%; P=0.04), anakinra (33 vs. 7%; P=0.008), and ≥2 immunosuppressants (20 vs. 0%; P=0.001) were all associated with cs-CMV. Receiving ≥2 immunosuppressants was associated with a 2-fold increase in CMV reactivation in multivariate analyses (aOR 2.27, 95%CI 1.1-4.8, P=0.03). Overall, 1-year mortality was significantly higher in those with CMV reactivation (57% vs. 23%, P=0.001). Immunosuppression, particularly corticosteroids, for the management of CAR T cell toxicities is a major risk factor for CMV reactivation. CMV preventive strategies in high-risk CAR T recipients might improve outcomes.

Melphalan on day -1 versus day -2 in patients with plasma cell disorders undergoing autologous stem cell transplant.

High-dose melphalan-based autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) remains a standard of care for plasma cell disorders (PCDs). Currently, there is variability in the literature surrounding the timing of melphalan administration to avoid potential cytotoxic effects, although the administration has been safely proposed when given at least 8 hours prior to stem cell infusion. The objectives of this study were to assess differences in safety and efficacy outcomes between day -1 and day -2 single-dose melphalan administration in patients undergoing ASCT for PCDs. A retrospective chart review was performed at our institution comparing patients receiving melphalan on day -1 to an equal number of patients receiving melphalan on day -2. The primary endpoint was time to neutrophil engraftment from stem cell infusion. Univariate analyses were performed. Mean time to neutrophil engraftment from stem cell infusion was identical at 10.7 days for both cohorts (p = 0.88). Mean time to platelet engraftment from stem cell infusion was shorter with day -1 administration (17.4 vs. 18.6 days, p = 0.06). Mean time to neutrophil and platelet engraftment from melphalan infusion were significantly shorter with day -1 administration. Similar outcomes were observed for length of hospitalization, infection- and mucositis-related toxicities, hematologic response, transplant-related mortality, and overall survival. Our findings show no difference in time to neutrophil engraftment from stem cell infusion and a trend toward shorter time to platelet engraftment with day -1 administration. Based on our study, day -1 melphalan administration is an acceptable and safe practice.

Aseptic Meningitis after Recovery from SARS-CoV-2 in an Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplant Recipient.

SARS-CoV-2 emerged as a worldwide pandemic in late 2019 and initially was described as a primary respiratory illness. The clinical manifestations of COVID-19 are now known to encompass nearly all organ systems, including the central nervous system. We present a case of an allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipient who recovered from documented SARS-CoV-2 infection and later presented with symptoms of meningitis. While cerebrospinal fluid analysis did not reveal any bacterial or viral etiologies, evidence of an inflammatory state, including ophthalmologic findings of episcleritis, indicate what is likely the first reported case of aseptic meningitis associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection after initial clinical recovery.

Multidirectional Walking in Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Patients.

BACKGROUND: The effect of a peritransplant multidirectional walking intervention to target losses in physical function and quality of life (QOL) has not been investigated. PURPOSE: This study examined the effects of a novel multidirectional walking program on physical function and QOL in adults receiving a hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT). METHODS: Thirty-five adults receiving an autologous or allogeneic HSCT were randomized to a multidirectional walking (WALK) or usual care (CONT) group. The WALK group received supervised training during hospitalization; the CONT group received usual care. Patients were assessed at admission (t0), 3 to 5 d post-HSCT (t1), and 30 d post-HSCT (t2). Physical function measures included the 6-min walk test (6MWT), the Physical Performance Test, and the Timed Up and Go test. Health-related QOL was collected using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Bone Marrow Transplant (FACT-BMT) questionnaire. RESULTS: There were no significant between-group changes for physical function or QOL. However, after the intervention (t1 to t2), the WALK group showed significant improvement in aerobic capacity (6MWT, P = 0.01), physical (P < 0.01) and functional well-being (P = 0.04), and overall QOL scores (P < 0.01). The CONT group saw no significant changes in physical function or QOL. Effect sizes showed the WALK group had a larger positive effect on physical function and QOL. Minimal clinically important differences in the 6MWT and FACT-BMT were exceeded in the WALK group. CONCLUSION: A multidirectional walking program during the transplant period may be effective at increasing aerobic capacity and QOL for patients receiving HSCT compared with no structured exercise.

Therapeutic options in patients with lymphoma and severe liver dysfunction.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the long-term outcome of patients presenting with synchronous lymphoma and severe liver dysfunction and to describe the outcome of patients treated with initial mechlorethamine-based therapy used as a bridge to more conventional chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We reviewed the clinical course of all patients diagnosed as having lymphoma who presented with severe liver dysfunction and received intravenous mechlorethamine between September 1988 and February 2003 at the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minn. RESULTS: Forty-one patients were identified, 33 (80%) of whom had newly diagnosed, previously untreated lymphoma. Thirty-seven (90%) had non-Hodgkin lymphoma, and 4 (10%) had Hodgkin disease. Thirty-four patients (83%) had stage IV disease, and 31 (84%) of 37 had an intermediate-high International Prognostic Index. The median total bilirubin level before therapy was 10.7 mg/dL (range, 2.5-30.2 mg/dL), and the median alkaline phosphatase level was 982 U/L (range, 233-3415 U/L). In addition to mechlorethamine, 34 patients (83%) received concomitant corticosteroids, and 12 (29%) received concomitant rituximab. Twenty-two patients (54%) had sufficient improvement in liver function to receive subsequent standard chemotherapy. Nine patients (22%) are alive and disease-free at a median of 31 months (range, 4 to > or = 87 months) after mechlorethamine treatment. Factors associated with improved overall survival included improvement in bilirubin levels (P < .001) and receiving subsequent standard chemotherapy (P = .001). CONCLUSION: Mechlorethamine, high-dose corticosteroids, and rituximab are useful therapeutic interventions for this unique group of patients with lymphoma and severe liver dysfunction. Substantial clinical improvement and long-term survival are possible.