RESUMO
Objetivo: analisar e representar, espacialmente, a evolução da distribuição geográfica dasocorrências de Hanseníase no Maranhão entre os anos de 2013 a 2015, utilizando técnicas degeoprocessamento. Método: realizou-se análise, utilizando mapas e tabelas temáticas, com base nosregistros do Sistema de Informação de Agravos de Notificação. Resultados: foram identificados 1.879casos, somados entre 219 bairros residenciais. Para o ano de 2013, o distrito mais afetado foi oTirirical; em 2014, aumentou a prevalência nos Distritos de Bequimão e Coroadinho e em 2015, houveuma redução de prevalências nos distritos de Tirirical Cohab, Coroadinho e Itaqui Bacanga.Conclusão: apesar de algumas localidades estudadas terem apresentado uma diminuição daprevalência entre 2013 e 2014, de 2014 a 2015 houve um aumento na quantidade de casos. O estudode prevalências possibilitou essa identificação de casos, podendo ser observada a imprescindibilidadede subsidiar estratégias de controle.
Objective: to analyze and spatially represent the evolution of the geographic distribution ofoccurrences of Leprosy in Maranhão between the years 2013 to 2015 using geoprocessing techniques.Method: the analysis was performed using maps and thematic tables, based on the records of theNotifiable Diseases Information System. Results: 1.879 cases were identified, among 219 residentialdistricts. For the year 2013, the district most affected was Tirirical; in 2014, increased prevalencein the Districts of Bequimão and Coroadinho and in 2015, there was a reduction of prevalences in thedistricts of Tirirical Cohab, Coroadinho and Itaqui Bacanga. Conclusion: although some localitiesstudied showed decrease in their prevalence between 2013 and 2014; there was increase in thenumber of cases from 2014 to 2015. The prevalence study made it possible to identify cases, and itis possible to observe the necessity of subsidizing control strategies.
Assuntos
Humanos , Epidemiologia , Hanseníase , Mapeamento GeográficoRESUMO
With the aim of validating the FAMACHA(©) as a method for phenotypic selection of sheep resistant/resilient to gastrointestinal nematodes, 27 Suffolk ewes with known FAMACHA(©) score histories were experimentally infected with 25,000 larvae of Haemonchus contortus. From the day of infection (day 0) to 60 days post-infection, at intervals of 7-15 days, ewes were evaluated for packed cell volume (PCV) and fecal egg counts (FEC). A statistically significant increase (p<0.05) in FEC occurred between day 0 and day 60. PCV values showed a decrease (p<0.05) starting from day 21, compared to day 0. Based on the changes in FEC and PCV values from day 0 to day 60, 15 ewes (55.56%) were classified as susceptible (S) and 12 ewes (44.44%) as resistant/resilient (RR). A comparison of the average FEC after infection between susceptible (4487.6 eggs per gram-epg) and resistant/resilient (1317.9epg) ewes showed a significant difference (p<0.05) between the two groups. The difference in average PCV values after infection (24.8% and 30.3% for S and RR, respectively) was also significant (p<0.05). Data from 980 previous evaluations of FAMACHA(©) scores from the 27 ewes showed that 58.33% of the ewes classified as RR and 46.67% of the S group had a history of only F1 and F2 scores. In the RR group, only one animal (8.33%) had an F4 score, occurring one time out of the 61 evaluations of this ewe. In contrast, 40.0% of S group ewes had F4 and/or F5 scores. During the period of FAMACHA(©) score history that was evaluated, 69.56% of the total number of anthelmintic treatments in the flock were administered to ewes from group S. Since ewes with F4 and/or F5 scores during the FAMACHA(©) score time period were classified as susceptible during the experimental infection (with the exception of one ewe), we conclude that the FAMACHA(©) score history is a useful tool for the selection of ewes that are resistant/resilient, as well as for the identification of susceptible animals that should be culled.
