Achieving Competency in Fiber-Optic Intubation Among Resident Physicians After Higher- Versus Lower-Fidelity Task Training: A Randomized Controlled Study.

BACKGROUND: The high-fidelity ORSIM (Airway Simulation Ltd) and the low-fidelity wooden-block fiber-optic task trainers allow users to familiarize themselves with the psychomotor skills required to manipulate the fiber-optic scope. METHODS: This single-center study aimed to compare residents' performance of fiber-optic intubation after 2 different types of task training. Twenty-four residents with experience of <8 fiber-optic intubations were randomized to either the ORSIM or a wooden-block task trainer. In a single teaching session, the resident performed 20 fiber-optic intubations on their assigned task trainer. This implied simulator competence. In the 4 months after this training, all subjects then attempted to perform a fiber-optic intubation on an American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) I or II anesthetized patient whose airway was preoperatively assessed as normal. The primary outcome was the cumulative sum (CUSUM) learning curves obtained as the residents trained on their respective task trainers. Secondary outcomes included: the mean time (in seconds) to perform each of the 20 fiber-optic intubations on their assigned task trainer, the total simulator training time, global rating scale score, checklist score, and time to carina when performing fiber-optic intubation on the patient. RESULTS: The CUSUM analysis showed that the ORSIM group achieved simulator competence faster. The mean time to perform fiber-optic intubation was shorter in the ORSIM group. A 2-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) test suggests that the combined effect of group (wooden-block or ORSIM) and time is statistically significant ( P < .05).Total training time (mean, 899 s ± 440 s vs 1358 s ± 405 s; 95% confidence interval [CI], 100.46-818.54; P = .01) was also significantly better in the ORSIM group.No significant difference was found between the 2 groups ( P > 0) in terms of global rating scale, checklist score, and time to reach the carina ( P >.05) when performing the fiber-optic intubation on the patient. CONCLUSIONS: ORSIM showed superiority in terms of the CUSUM learning curve in reaching competence faster in fewer attempts. There was no statistically significant difference in residents' performance when translated to clinical practice on a patient. This information should assist course directors when choosing task trainers for fiber-optic intubation training programs.

Role of ultrasonography in an impalpable tissue larynx model during a simulated front-of-neck access scenario: a randomized simulation study.

PURPOSE: A large vertical incision is recommended when performing front-of-neck access in patients with impalpable neck landmarks during a cannot intubate-cannot oxygenate (CICO) scenario. We investigated the impact of ultrasonography on vertical incision size of a front-of-neck access on an ultrasound-compatible impalpable porcine larynx model. METHODS: Emergency medicine and anesthesia trainees were randomized to the Ultrasound (US, n = 21) and Non-Ultrasound (NUS, n = 21) groups. Within 1 week after a teaching session on airway ultrasound and Scalpel-Bougie-Tube (SBT) technique, participants were instructed to perform cricothyroidotomy on the model during a simulated cannot intubate-cannot oxygenate scenario. The primary outcome was a vertical size incision. Secondary outcomes were procedural completion time, horizontal size incision, tissue injury severity, and correct tube placement. RESULTS: The ultrasound group performed a significantly smaller vertical incision [median (IQR), 35.0 (15, 40) vs 65.0 (52, 100) mm (95% CI) - 30.0 (- 55.1, - 4.9), p = 0.02] and took longer total time to complete the procedure [median (IQR), 200.5 (126, 267) vs 93.5 (71.0, 167.5) secs (95% CI) 91.0 (3.73, 178.3), p = 0.04]. Tissue injury severity and correct tube placement were similar between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Ultrasound-guided identification of the cricothyroid membrane significantly reduced the recommended vertical incision size with similar success rates. However, there was an increased time when performing a Scalpel-Bougie-Tube cricothyroidotomy on an impalpable porcine larynx model by physicians in training. Ultrasonography should not be used in an emergency scenario of airway rescue. Its potential use to pre-mark the cricothyroid membrane should be considered in difficult airway management of impalpable neck.

RéSUMé: OBJECTIF: Il est recommandé de pratiquer une grande incision verticale lors de l'accès à l'avant du cou chez les patients dont les repères du cou sont impalpables, dans le cadre d'un scénario d'intubation impossible à oxygéner (CICO). Nous avons étudié l'impact de l'échographie sur la taille de l'incision verticale d'un accès à la face avant du cou sur un modèle de larynx porcin impalpable compatible avec l'échographie. MéTHODES: Des stagiaires en médecine d'urgence et en anesthésie ont été répartis de manière aléatoire entre les groupes "échographie" (US, n = 21) et "non-échographie" (NUS, n = 21). Une semaine après une session d'enseignement sur l'échographie des voies aériennes et la technique Scalpel-Bougie-Tube (SBT), les participants ont reçu l'instruction de réaliser une cricothyroïdotomie sur le modèle lors d'un scénario simulé d'impossibilité d'intubation et d'oxygénation. Le résultat primaire était une incision de taille verticale. Les résultats secondaires étaient le temps de réalisation de la procédure, la taille horizontale de l'incision, la gravité de la lésion tissulaire et le placement correct du tube. RéSULTATS: Le groupe échographie a réalisé une incision verticale significativement plus petite [médiane (IQR), 35,0 (15,40) vs 65,0 (52,100) mm (IC à 95 %) -30,0 (-55,1, -4,9), p = 0,02] et a pris un temps total plus long pour terminer la procédure [médiane (IQR), 200,5 (126, 267) vs 93,5 (71,0, 167,5) secondes (IC à 95 %) 91,0 (3,73, 178,3), p = 0,04]. La gravité des lésions tissulaires et le placement correct du tube étaient similaires entre les groupes. CONCLUSIONS: L'identification échoguidée de la membrane cricothyroïdienne a réduit de manière significative la taille de l'incision verticale recommandée avec des taux de réussite similaires. Cependant, il y avait une augmentation du temps lors de la réalisation d'une cricothyroïdotomie Scalpel-Bougie-Tube sur un modèle de larynx porcin impalpable par des médecins en formation. L'échographie ne doit pas être utilisée dans un scénario d'urgence de sauvetage des voies respiratoires. Son utilisation potentielle pour pré-marquer la membrane cricothyroïdienne devrait être envisagée dans la gestion des voies aériennes difficiles du cou impalpable.

Effects of prior exposure to a visual airway cognitive aid on decision-making in a simulated airway emergency: A randomised controlled study.

BACKGROUND: Decision-making deficits in airway emergencies have led to adverse patient outcomes. A cognitive aid would assist clinicians through critical decision-making steps, preventing key action omission. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to investigate the effects of a visual airway cognitive aid on decision-making in a simulated airway emergency scenario. DESIGN: Randomised controlled study. SETTING: Single-institution, tertiary-level hospital in Toronto, Canada from September 2017 to March 2019. PARTICIPANTS: Teams consisting of a participant anaesthesia resident, nurse and respiratory therapist were randomised to intervention (N = 20 teams) and control groups (N = 20 teams). INTERVENTION: Participants in both groups received a 15-min didactic session on crisis resource management which included teamwork communication and the concepts of cognitive aids for the management of nonairway and airway critical events. Only participants in the intervention group were familiarised, oriented and instructed on a visual airway cognitive aid that was developed for this study. Within 1 to 4 weeks after the teaching session, teams were video-recorded managing a simulated 'cannot intubate-cannot oxygenate' scenario with the aid displayed in the simulation centre. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Decision-making time to perform a front-of-neck access (FONA), airway checklist actions, teamwork performances and a postscenario questionnaire. RESULTS: Both groups performed similar key airway actions; however, the intervention group took a shorter decision-making time than the control group to perform a FONA after a last action [mean ± SD, 80.9 ±â€Š54.5 vs. 122.2 ±â€Š55.7 s; difference (95% CI) -41.2 (-76.5 to -6.0) s, P = 0.023]. Furthermore, the intervention group used the aid more than the control group (63.0 vs. 28.1%, P < 0.001). Total time of scenario completion, action checklist and teamwork performances scores were similar between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Prior exposure and teaching of a visual airway cognitive aid improved decision-making time to perform a FONA during a simulated airway emergency.

In situ simulation and its effects on patient outcomes: a systematic review.

Background: The use of in situ simulation has previously been shown to increase confidence, teamwork and practical skills of trained professionals. However, a direct benefit to patient outcomes has not been sufficiently explored. This review focuses on the effect of in situ simulation training in a hospital setting on morbidity or mortality. Methods: A combined search was conducted in PUBMED, OVID, WEB OF SCIENCE, CINAHL, SCOPUS and EMBASE. 478 studies were screened with nine articles published between 2011 and 2017 meeting the inclusion criteria for analysis. Results: This review selected eight prospective studies and one prospective-retrospective study. Three studies isolated in situ simulation as an experimental variable while the remaining studies implemented in situ programmes as a component of larger quality improvement initiatives. Seven studies demonstrated a significant improvement in morbidity and/or mortality outcomes following integrated in situ simulation training. Conclusion: Existing literature, albeit limited, demonstrates that in situ training improves patient outcomes either in isolation or within a larger quality improvement programme. However, existing evidence contains difficulties such as isolating the impact of in situ training from various potential confounding factors and potential for publication bias.

Sterile versus nonsterile gloves for repair of uncomplicated lacerations in the emergency department: a randomized controlled trial.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Although sterile technique for laceration management continues to be recommended, studies supporting this practice are lacking. Using clean nonsterile gloves rather than individually packaged sterile gloves for uncomplicated wound repair in the emergency department may result in cost and time savings. This study is designed to determine whether the rate of infection after repair of uncomplicated lacerations in immunocompetent patients is comparable using clean nonsterile gloves versus sterile gloves. METHODS: A prospective multicenter trial enrolled 816 individuals who were randomized to have their wounds repaired by using sterile or clean nonsterile gloves. The attending physician or resident completed a checklist describing patient, wound, and management characteristics. The patients were provided with a questionnaire to be completed by the physician who removed their sutures at the prescribed time and indicated the presence or absence of infection. When follow-up forms were not returned, a telephone call was made to the patient to determine whether he or she had experienced any wound complications. RESULTS: Follow-up was obtained for 98% of the sterile gloves group and 96.6% of the clean gloves group. There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of infection between the 2 groups. The infection rate in the sterile gloves group was 6.1% (95% confidence interval [CI] 3.8% to 8.4%) and was 4.4% in the clean gloves group (95% CI 2.4% to 6.4%). The relative risk of infection was 1.37 (95% CI 0.75 to 2.52). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that there is no clinically important difference in infection rates between using clean nonsterile gloves and sterile gloves during the repair of uncomplicated traumatic lacerations.