Long-term benzodiazepine prescription in treatment-resistant depression: A national FACE-TRD prospective study.

BACKGROUND: Benzodiazepine long-term use (BLTU) is a public health challenge. We lack data on the consequences of LBTU on the trajectory of treatment-resistant depression (TRD). OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence of BLTU in a nationwide non-selected population of patients with TRD, to determine the rate of patients succeeding at withdrawing benzodiazepines at one year and to determine if persistent BLTU is associated with poorer mental health outcomes. METHOD: The FACE-TRD cohort is a national cohort of TRD patients recruited in 13 resistant depression expert centers between 2014 and 2021 and followed-up at one year. A standardized one-day long comprehensive battery was carried out, including trained-clinician and patient-reported outcomes, and patients were reevaluated at one year. RESULTS: At baseline, 45.2% of the patients were classified in the BLTU group. In multivariate analysis, compared to patients without BLTU, patients with BLTU were more frequently classified in the "low physical activity" group (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 1.885, p = 0.036), and had higher primary healthcare consumption (B = 0.158, p = 0.031) independently of age, sex and antipsychotic consumption. We found no significant difference for personality traits, suicidal ideation, impulsivity, childhood trauma exposure, earlier age at first major depressive episode, anxiety and sleep disorders (all p > 0.05). Despite recommendations for withdrawal, <5% of BLTU patients withdraw benzodiazepines during the one-year follow-up. Persistent BLTU at one-year was associated with higher depression severity (B = 0.189, p = 0.029), higher clinical global severity (B = 0.210, p = 0.016), higher state-anxiety (B = 0.266, p = 0.003), impaired sleep quality (B = 0.249, p = 0.008), increased peripheral inflammation (B = 0.241, p = 0.027), lower functioning level (B = -0.240, p = 0.006), decreased processing speed (B = -0.195, p = 0.020) and verbal episodic memory (B = -0.178, p = 0.048), higher absenteeism and productivity loss (B = 0.595, p = 0.016) and lower subjective global health status (B = -0.198, p = 0.028). CONCLUSION: Benzodiazepines are over-prescribed in TRD (in almost a half of the patients). Despite recommendations for withdrawal and psychiatric follow-up, <5% of patients successfully stopped taking benzodiazepines at one-year. Maintaining BLTU may contribute to the worsening of clinical and cognitive symptoms and of daily functioning in TRD patients. Progressive and planed withdrawal of benzodiazepines seems therefore strongly recommended in TRD patients with BLTU. Pharmacological and non-pharmacological alternatives should be promoted when possible.

Sensory Gating Capacity and Attentional Function in Adults With ADHD: A Preliminary Neurophysiological and Neuropsychological Study.

Objective: The inability to filter sensory input correctly may impair higher cognitive function in ADHD. However, this relationship remains largely elusive. The objectives of the present study is to investigate the relationship between sensory input processing and cognitive function in adult patients with ADHD. Method: This study investigated the relationship between deficit in sensory gating capacity (P50 amplitude changes in a double-click conditioning-testing paradigm and perceptual abnormalities related to sensory gating deficit with the Sensory Gating Inventory [SGI]) and attentional and executive function (P300 amplitude in an oddball paradigm and attentional and executive performances with a neuropsychological test) in 24 adult patients with ADHD. Results: The lower the sensory gating capacity of the brain and the higher the distractibility related to sensory gating inability that the patients reported, the lower the P300 amplitude. Conclusion: The capacity of the brain to gate the response to irrelevant incoming sensory input may be a fundamental protective mechanism that prevents the flooding of higher brain structures with irrelevant information in adult patients with ADHD.

Sensory gating in adult with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: Event-evoked potential and perceptual experience reports comparisons with schizophrenia.

BACKGROUND: In daily life, adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) report abnormal perceptual experiences that can be related to sensory gating deficit. This study investigated and compared P50 suppression (a neurophysiological measure of sensory gating) and perceptual abnormalities related to sensory gating deficit in ADHD and schizophrenias patients. METHODS: Three groups were compared: 24 adults with ADHD, 24 patients with schizophrenia and 24 healthy subjects. The Sensory Gating Inventory (SGI), a validated self-report questionnaire, was used to measure perceptual abnormalities related to sensory gating deficit. P50 suppression was measured by P50 amplitude changes in a dual-click conditioning-testing auditory event-related potential procedure. RESULTS: Adults with ADHD had significantly higher scores on the SGI and significantly lower P50 suppression than healthy subjects. These deficits were similar to those found in patients with schizophrenia. A correlation was found between both the SGI and P50 suppression data in adults with ADHD and patients with schizophrenia. DISCUSSION: The findings confirm previous results found in patients with schizophrenia. Moreover, adults with ADHD, similar to patients with schizophrenia, had abnormal P50 suppression and reported being flooded with sensory stimuli. Abnormal neurophysiologic responses to repetitive stimuli gave rise to clinically abnormal perceptions.