RESUMO
BACKGROUND: The Laryngeal Mask Airway (LMA) ProSeal(TM) and the i-Gel(TM) are two extraglottic devices with either an inflatable cuff or a non-inflatable cuff. AIM: We test the hypothesis that oropharyngeal leak pressure and fiberoptic position of the airway tube differ between the size 2 LMA ProSeal(TM) and the i-Gel(TM) in non-paralysed ventilated children. METHODS: Fifty-one children aged 1.5-6 years weighing 10-25 kg were studied using a crossover design. Anaesthesia was with remifentanil/propofol mixture. The LMA ProSeal(TM) and the i-Gel(TM) were inserted into each patient in random order. RESULTS: Oropharyngeal leak pressure for the LMA ProSeal(TM) and the i-Gel(TM) was similar at 22 (5) and 21 (5) cm H(2) O, respectively. Fiberoptic position of the airway tube for the LMA ProSeal(TM) and the i-Gel(TM) was similar, with the vocal cords visible from the distal airway tube in 94% and 96%, respectively. CONCLUSION: We conclude that oropharyngeal leak pressure and fiberoptic position of the airway tube are similar for the size 2 LMA ProSeal(TM) and i-Gel(TM) in non-paralysed ventilated children.
Assuntos
Máscaras Laríngeas , Respiração Artificial/métodos , Pressão do Ar , Manuseio das Vias Aéreas , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Estudos Cross-Over , Feminino , Tecnologia de Fibra Óptica , Testes de Função Cardíaca , Humanos , Lactente , Masculino , Testes de Função Respiratória , Tamanho da AmostraRESUMO
In a randomised, non-crossover study, we tested the hypothesis that the ease of insertion using a duodenal tube guided insertion technique and the oropharyngeal leak pressure differ between the LMA ProSeal and the i-gel in non-paralysed, anesthetised female subjects. One hundred and fifty-two females aged 19-70 years were studied. Insertion success rate, insertion time and oropharyngeal leak pressure were measured. First attempt and overall insertion success were similar (LMA ProSeal, 75/76 (99%) and 76/76 (100%); i-gel 73/75 (97%) and 75 (100%), respectively). Mean (SD) insertion times were similar (LMA ProSeal, 40 (16) s; i-gel 43 (21) s). Mean oropharyngeal leak pressure was 7 cmH(2) O higher with the LMA ProSeal (p < 0.0001). Insertion of the LMA ProSeal and i-gel is similarly easy using a duodenal tube guided technique, but the LMA ProSeal forms a more effective seal for ventilation.
