Efficacy of family history in determining thrombophilia risk.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: This retrospective study sought to examine the importance of family history of cardiovascular disease (CVD) or venous thromboembolism (VTE) in predicting risk for an inherited thrombophilia. DESIGN/METHODS: A cohort of 88 adolescent females who had a thrombophilia panel in the last three years was identified for this retrospective chart review. Family history data of CVD or VTE were collected in addition to laboratory results from the thrombophilia screen. SETTING: Adolescent patients who had a thrombophilia screen within the last three years at University OB-GYN Associates, Louisville, KY. RESULTS: Within the cohort (n=88), 21% of patients were found to have a documented thrombophilia. At least 47% of individuals diagnosed with thrombophilia had more than one screening abnormality. A family history of VTE was noted to have a positive predictive value (PPV) of 40% and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 88% for detection of thrombophilia. Patients with a family history of CVD alone carried a PPV of 24% and NPV of 100%. Finally, among individuals with both family history risk factors, PPV was strengthened at 52% while NPV remained unchanged. CONCLUSIONS: Within the last decade, inherited thrombophilias have gained more clinical interest. While thrombophilia disease prevalence data is available for the adult population, there remains a paucity of data in adolescents. Our results reinforce the importance for screening adolescent females, prior to contraceptive administration, if family history risk factors exist.

Vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia in adolescents with abnormal Pap smear results: a series report.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to determine the prevalence of vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia (VIN) in adolescents presenting for cervical colposcopy in an adolescent gynecology office. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective chart review from 1999 to 2002 of the concomitant diagnosis of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and VIN in our private general pediatric and adolescent practice in patients younger than 22 years of age who underwent cervical colposcopy as well as evaluation of the vulva secondary to gross and microscopic visualized lesions. RESULTS: Sixty-one patients underwent colposcopy for abnormal Pap smears; we found a 10% overall prevalence of vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia. Forty-four percent (n=27) underwent concomitant evaluation of the vulva; from these, 22% (n=6) fulfilled the characteristics of vulvar and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. CONCLUSION: In the presence of cervical cytology abnormalities, VIN may be more common than recognized and careful screening is definitely warranted.

Characteristics of a group of adolescents undergoing loop electrical excision procedure (LEEP).

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To describe the sociodemographic characteristics of a cohort of adolescents undergoing loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) of the cervix, and to determine if LEEP is a safe and effective procedure for evaluation and treatment of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL) of the cervix in adolescents. SETTING: Case series of all adolescents who underwent LEEP between 1995 and 1997 at Children's Hospital, Boston, MA. DESIGN: Medical and laboratory records were reviewed to assess baseline characteristics and the following outcomes: (1) LEEP pathology results, (2) postoperative complications, (3) pregnancy outcomes, (4) compliance with follow-up appointments, and (5) recurrence of disease over a 12- to 37-month period. PARTICIPANTS: Thirty-five adolescents underwent LEEP. The mean age of the adolescents at the time of LEEP was 17.9 +/- 1.5 yrs. RESULTS: The mean interval between coitarche and LEEP was 3.69 +/- 2.09 yrs. On preoperative colposcopy, 28 (80%) had HSIL on biopsy, 3 (8.6%) had HSIL on Pap smear with a discordant biopsy demonstrating low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL), 1 (2.9%) had a persistent LSIL, 2 (5.6%) had diffuse LSIL with an unsatisfactory colposcopy, and 1 (2.9%) had a HSIL Pap smear with a normal biopsy. LEEP specimen histopathology results were: HSIL in 19 (54%), LSIL in 10 (29%), SIL difficult to grade in 3 (9%), and no residual disease in 3 (9.0%). Postoperative complications were bleeding in 2 (5.7%), pain in 1 (2.9%), vaginal discharge in 1 (2.9%), cervicitis in 3 (8.6%), and endometritis in 2 (5.7%). Fourteen pregnancies were diagnosed after LEEP; no spontaneous abortions occurred. Mean follow-up period was 21.1 +/- 9.4 months. Compliance with follow-up appointments was 51% in the first 12 months post-LEEP and 26% in the second 12 months post-LEEP. Of the 28 patients followed for 12 months or more, there was one recurrence of HSIL confirmed by colposcopy and biopsy. CONCLUSIONS: Outcome and complications of LEEP in adolescent females are similar to those reported in larger series of adult women. LEEP appears to be a safe and effective procedure for the evaluation and treatment of HSIL of the cervix in adolescents, but additional long-term data are needed.