The treatment of cognitive dysfunction in dementia: a multiple treatments meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: No cure is currently available for dementia; however, various treatments and interventions have been reported to be effective. The factors influencing the efficacy of dementia treatment have not been comprehensively evaluated. This study evaluated the factors influencing treatment effects on cognitive dysfunction in dementia by comparing the results obtained from a meta-analysis based on meta-regression. METHODS: We searched for articles, clinical trials, and meta-analyses on the efficacy of pharmacotherapy or psychosocial treatment for dementia published between 2000 and 2016 in the MEDLINE/PubMed, Cochrane Library, SCOPUS, and Airiti Library databases. RESULTS: The 235 selected studies involved 44,854 patients with dementia (mainly vascular dementia, Alzheimer disease, and mild cognitive impairment). A preliminary random effects meta-analysis yielded a positive overall effect. The pooled standardized mean difference of the treatment effects on cognitive dysfunction was 0.439 (95% confidence interval 0.374, 0.504). The results of meta-regression showed that in young patients (ß = - 0.036, p value < 0.001) with vascular dementia (ß = 0.603, p value < 0.001), the efficacies of treatment 2 (symptomatic treatment for vascular dementia with piracetam, nimodipine, aniracetam, flunarizine, vinpocetine, hyperbaric oxygen, oxiracetam, or EGB761) and treatment 5 (treatment with other alternative therapies including acupuncture, premarin, statin, butylphthalide soft capsules, donepezil, huperzine A, and lithium treatment) were higher than those of other existing treatments for cognitive dysfunction (ß = 0.308 and 0.321, p values = 0.010 and < 0.001, respectively). CONCLUSION: The most effective intervention for dementia available is symptomatic treatment for vascular dementia. Antipsychotic treatment for dementia alleviates cognitive dysfunction less effectively than does symptomatic treatment. Alternative therapies are also effective at present. Further research on causes and very early diagnosis of Alzheimer disease is warranted.

Spatial autocorrelation analysis of health care hotspots in Taiwan in 2006.

BACKGROUND: Spatial analytical techniques and models are often used in epidemiology to identify spatial anomalies (hotspots) in disease regions. These analytical approaches can be used to not only identify the location of such hotspots, but also their spatial patterns. METHODS: In this study, we utilize spatial autocorrelation methodologies, including Global Moran's I and Local Getis-Ord statistics, to describe and map spatial clusters, and areas in which these are situated, for the 20 leading causes of death in Taiwan. In addition, we use the fit to a logistic regression model to test the characteristics of similarity and dissimilarity by gender. RESULTS: Gender is compared in efforts to formulate the common spatial risk. The mean found by local spatial autocorrelation analysis is utilized to identify spatial cluster patterns. There is naturally great interest in discovering the relationship between the leading causes of death and well-documented spatial risk factors. For example, in Taiwan, we found the geographical distribution of clusters where there is a prevalence of tuberculosis to closely correspond to the location of aboriginal townships. CONCLUSIONS: Cluster mapping helps to clarify issues such as the spatial aspects of both internal and external correlations for leading health care events. This is of great aid in assessing spatial risk factors, which in turn facilitates the planning of the most advantageous types of health care policies and implementation of effective health care services.

Sarcosine (N-methylglycine) treatment for acute schizophrenia: a randomized, double-blind study.

BACKGROUND: Small molecules that enhance the N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) neurotransmission have been shown to be beneficial as adjuvant therapy for schizophrenia. Among these compounds, sarcosine (a glycine transporter-I inhibitor), when added to an existing regimen of antipsychotic drugs, has shown its efficacy for both chronically stable and acutely ill patients. However, the efficacy of these agents as a primary antipsychotic agent has not yet been demonstrated. METHODS: Twenty acutely symptomatic drug-free patients with schizophrenia were randomly assigned under double-blind conditions to receive a 6-week trial of 2 g or 1 g of sarcosine daily. RESULTS: Overall, patients in the 2-g group were more likely to respond as defined by a 20% or more reduction of the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale total score, particularly among antipsychotic-naïve patients. However, there was no significant between-group difference in the sarcosine dose x time interaction analysis. Both doses were well tolerated with minimal side effects. CONCLUSIONS: Although patients receiving the 2-g daily dose were more likely to respond, it requires further clarification whether the effect is limited to the antipsychotic-naive population. Future placebo- or active-controlled, larger-sized studies are needed to fully assess sarcosine's effects.

Comparisons of glucose-insulin homeostasis following maprotiline and fluoxetine treatment in depressed males.

BACKGROUND: To investigate the effects of antidepressants on glucose-insulin homeostasis, we provided homogenous situation and performed standard procedures to assess the interactions of antidepressants and glucose regulation during hospitalization. METHODS: Twenty-three non-diabetic depressed males were recruited and assigned to two groups based on the antidepressants received (maprotiline n=11, fluoxetine n=12). The severity of depression was evaluated using a 21-item Hamilton depression rating scale (HAM-D). Before and after the 4-week treatment, participants underwent 75-g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) and frequently sampled intravenous glucose tolerance test (FSIGT). Insulin sensitivity (SI), glucose effectiveness (SG), acute insulin response (AIR), and disposition index (DI) were estimated using minimal model method. RESULTS: The HAM-D scores were reduced significantly (P<0.005) after antidepressant treatment. Following maprotiline treatment, the body weight and BMI were significantly increased (P=0.02). Individuals treated with maprotiline displayed a significantly increased AIR (3239+/-682 vs. 4698+/-597 pmol; P=0.04) during the FSIGT. LIMITATIONS: The sample size was limited. Furthermore, the study was conducted in the early phase of depression-treated course. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that the beta-cell function is hyperbolic in order to offset the insulin resistance following maprotiline treatment. Our findings imply that norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor (NRI) antidepressants might attenuate insulin sensitivity.

A phase III study of adjuvant chemotherapy in advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the role of adjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients, we conducted a randomized Phase III trial comparing radiotherapy (RT) followed by adjuvant chemotherapy to RT alone in patients with advanced NPC. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between November 1994 and March 1999, 157 patients with Stage IV, M(0) (UICC/AJCC, 1992) advanced NPC disease were randomized to receive standard radiotherapy, as follows: 35-40 fractions, 1.8-2.0 Gy/fraction/day, 5 days/week, to a total dose 70-72 Gy with or without 9 weekly cycles of 24-h infusional chemotherapy (20 mg/m(2) cisplatin, 2,200 mg/m(2) 5-fluorouracil, and 120 mg/m(2) leucovorin) after RT. Of 157 patients enrolled, 154 (77 radiotherapy, 77 combined therapy) were evaluable for survival and toxicity analysis. RESULTS: With a median follow-up of 49.5 months, the 5-year overall survival and relapse-free survival rates were 60.5% vs. 54.5% (p = 0.5) and 49.5% vs. 54.4% (p = 0.38) for the radiotherapy-alone group and the combined radiotherapy and adjuvant chemotherapy group, respectively. The Cox regression showed that the hazard rates ratio of combined treatment to RT alone was 0.673 (p value = 0.232); the 95% confidence interval was 0.352 and 1.288, respectively. Patients who received combined treatment had a lower systemic relapse rate than radiotherapy-alone patients, according to relapse pattern analysis. The incidence of leukopenia (>or= Grade 3) occurred in 17 out of 819 (2.1%) cycles of weekly chemotherapy. No patient developed moderate to severe mucositis (>or= Grade 3). CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that adjuvant chemotherapy after RT for patients with advanced NPC has no benefit for overall survival or relapse-free survival.