Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Maturitas ; 42(2): 113-7, 2002 Jun 25.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12065170

RESUMO

BACKGROUND/AIM: The aim of this study was to compare the role of quantitative ultrasonography (QUS) and dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) in the assessment of osteoporosis. METHODS: From June 1999 to November 2001, 596 women who have not been diagnosed osteoporosis and without previous history of pathologic fractures were enrolled in this study. They had a mean age of 58.7+/-8.5 years, a mean height of 166+/-3.5 cm and a mean weight of 66+/-4.1 kg. According to the age, women were divided into three groups: group A included women between 45 and 55 years; group B women between 56 and 66 years and group C women between 67 and 77 years. Each patient underwent to both methods to determine the presence of osteoporosis. RESULTS: QUS resulted in a greater number of women of group A at risk of osteoporosis, whereas DEXA indicated that more women of group C were at increased osteoporotic risk. QUS and DEXA gave concordant results only in women of group B. CONCLUSION: These results suggested that QUS screening for osteoporosis may be more suitable for 'younger' postmenopausal women.


Assuntos
Osteoporose Pós-Menopausa/epidemiologia , Pós-Menopausa , Absorciometria de Fóton , Idoso , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Osteoporose Pós-Menopausa/diagnóstico , Fatores de Risco , Ultrassonografia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...