Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Atherosclerosis ; 211(1): 242-8, 2010 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20206356

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Atherosclerosis and restenosis are largely ruled by inflammation. The aim of this study was to test the effects of a short-course, high-dose oral prednisone on the release of interleukin-6 (IL-6) and tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha from circulating monocytes and on the neointimal growth that follows bare metal stent (BMS) implantation. In a sub-group of patients activated NF-kappaB was also evaluated. METHODS: Out of 40 patients with coronary artery disease treated with BMS implantation, 20 were randomly assigned to receive oral prednisone during 40 days according to a standardized protocol. In non-stimulated and stimulated (LPS and PMA) monocytes we evaluated the release of IL-6 and TNF-alpha, and NF-kappaB p50 subunit translocation at baseline, at 10 and 30 days. Late luminal loss (LLL) 9 months after angioplasty was calculated by quantitative coronary angiography. RESULTS: Plasma concentrations of prednisone correlated inversely with IL-6 and TNF-alpha release (R2=0.45, p=0.04 and R2=0.69, p=0.005, respectively) and NF-kappaB activation from monocytes (R2=0.58, p=0.01). The reduction of TNF-alpha release and NF-kappaB activation were significantly related (R2=0.56, p=0.01). Prednisone patients showed a significantly larger reduction of cytokine release and NF-kappaB activation compared to non-treated patients, at 10 days and 30 days. LLL was lower in the prednisone group (0.44+/-0.35 mm versus 0.80+/-0.53 mm, p=0.02) and correlated with reduction of TNF-alpha (R2=0.41, p=0.01). CONCLUSIONS: High doses of oral prednisone reduce NF-kappaB pathway activation and pro-inflammatory cytokine release in circulating activated monocytes of patients treated with coronary stenting. TNF-alpha release reduction correlates with decreased LLL.


Assuntos
Doença da Artéria Coronariana/tratamento farmacológico , Reestenose Coronária/prevenção & controle , Citocinas/metabolismo , Interleucina-6/metabolismo , Monócitos/efeitos dos fármacos , NF-kappa B/metabolismo , Prednisona/uso terapêutico , Fator de Necrose Tumoral alfa/metabolismo , Idoso , Angioplastia Coronária com Balão , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/cirurgia , Feminino , Humanos , Mediadores da Inflamação/metabolismo , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Monócitos/imunologia , Stents
2.
Metabolism ; 52(7): 862-7, 2003 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12870162

RESUMO

To compare efficacy and tolerability of combination treatment with metformin and sulfonylurea with each of these drugs alone in the treatment of type 2 diabetes, 88 type 2 diabetic subjects (hemoglobin A1c [HbA1c] levels, 8.0%+/-1.0%; age, 57.3+/-7.1 years; body mass index [BMI]. 27.0+/-2.6 kg/m2; diabetes duration, 9.8+/-8.2 years; means +/- SD) were randomly assigned to double-blind treatment with metformin (500 to 3,000 mg/d), glibenclamide (5 to 15 mg/d), or their combination (metformin 400 to 2,400 mg/d + glibenclamide 2.5 to 15 mg/d) for 6 months. Thereafter, groups were crossed over for the following 6 months. Thus, each patient received metformin or glibenclamide alone, and the combination treatment. Doses were titrated to obtain HbA1c levels < or = 6.0% and fasting plasma glucose levels less than 140 mg/dL. Eighty patients concluded both treatment periods and were included in the analysis of treatment efficacy. In patients receiving metformin or glibenclamide alone, the maximal dose was reached in 21 and 25 patients, respectively; 8 and 15 of these subjects, respectively, required the maximal dose when they were on the combination treatment. During the study, 4 (10.0%) subjects receiving metformin, 7 (17.1%) receiving glibenclamide, and 31 (39.2%) receiving the combination treatment reached HbA1c levels < or = 6.0%. Moreover, when efficacy of the combination treatment on glycemic control was compared with that of single-drug therapies in each individual patient, the combination was significantly more effective than either metformin or glibenclamide (HbA1c after treatment, 6.1%+/-1.1% v 7.3%+/-1.4%, and 6.5%+/-0.7% v 7.6%+/-1.5%, respectively, both P<.0001). In conclusion, combination treatment with metformin and sulfonylurea is more effective than these drugs alone in improving glycemic control in type 2 diabetes, while also allowing a reduction of the dosage of each drug.


Assuntos
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamento farmacológico , Glibureto/administração & dosagem , Hipoglicemiantes/administração & dosagem , Metformina/administração & dosagem , Glicemia/análise , Índice de Massa Corporal , Colesterol/sangue , LDL-Colesterol/sangue , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/fisiopatologia , Método Duplo-Cego , Quimioterapia Combinada , Jejum , Feminino , Hemoglobinas Glicadas/análise , Homeostase , Humanos , Resistência à Insulina , Ilhotas Pancreáticas/fisiopatologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...