Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Acta Neurochir (Wien) ; 165(11): 3421-3429, 2023 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37733080

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To refine a reliable and reproducible intraoperative visual evoked potentials (iVEPs) monitoring protocol during endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery. To assess the reliability of baseline iVEPs in predicting preoperative visual status and perioperative iVEP variation in predicting postoperative visual outcome. METHODS: Sixty-four patients harboring tumors of the pituitary region were included. All patients underwent endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) with iVEPs monitoring, using a totally intravenous anesthetic protocol. Ophthalmological evaluation included visual acuity and visual field studies. RESULTS: Preoperatively, visual acuity was reduced in 86% and visual field in 76.5% of cases. Baseline iVEPs amplitude was significantly correlated with preoperative visual acuity and visual field (p = 0.001 and p = 0.0004, respectively), confirming the reliability of the neurophysiological/anesthetic protocol implemented. Importantly, perioperatively the variation in iVEPs amplitude was significantly correlated with the changes in visual acuity (p < 0.0001) and visual field (p = 0.0013). ROC analysis confirmed that iVEPs are an accurate predictor of perioperiative visual acuity improvement, with a 100% positive predictive value in patients with preoperative vision loss. CONCLUSIONS: iVEPs during EEA is highly reliable in describing preoperative visual function and can accurately predict postoperative vision improvement. SIGNIFICANCE: iVEPs represent a promising resource for carrying out a more effective and safe endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery.


Assuntos
Potenciais Evocados Visuais , Neoplasias Hipofisárias , Humanos , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Neoplasias Hipofisárias/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Hipofisárias/cirurgia , Neoplasias Hipofisárias/patologia , Visão Ocular , Endoscopia/métodos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento
2.
World Neurosurg ; 109: 455-459, 2018 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29097337

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Ventriculoatrial (VA) shunt is a routine technique for the treatment of hydrocephalus. The correct position at the superior vena cava-right atrium junction is generally assessed by radiography. We present the first experience of an alternative, nonradiographic technique to assess the distal end of the VA shunts through an electrocardiographic (EKG) method. The technique has developed from the large experience of central venous catheters (CVC) worldwide; the EKG-guided method is a common and validated alternative to standard radiologic control of the location of the tip of any CVC. METHODS: Five consecutive patients underwent VA shunt with venous catheter positioned with the EKG-guided technique. The position of the catheter tip was verified by standard chest radiography. RESULTS: Four men and 1 woman (mean age, 45.4 years) underwent VA shunt for hydrocephalus with the EKG-guided technique. The side of internal jugular vein puncture was the right side in 4 cases and the left side in 1 case. As confirmed by radiography, all VA shunt tips were located within the correct range. There was no radiologic evidence of procedure-related complication or catheters that had to be replaced. CONCLUSIONS: The EKG-guided technique for VA shunts is as accurate as fluoroscopy, but simpler, more readily available, less expensive, safer, and more cost effective. It reduces the need of radiography and radiologic exposition for both patients and operators. The EKG method may be a valid and cost-effective alternative to standard radiologic control in VA shunts, as for any central venous access device, and could become the preferential method for confirming tip position during VA shunt surgery.


Assuntos
Ventrículos Cerebrais/cirurgia , Derivações do Líquido Cefalorraquidiano/economia , Derivações do Líquido Cefalorraquidiano/métodos , Análise Custo-Benefício , Eletrocardiografia/economia , Eletrocardiografia/métodos , Átrios do Coração/cirurgia , Hidrocefalia/cirurgia , Cirurgia Assistida por Computador/economia , Cirurgia Assistida por Computador/métodos , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Cateterismo Venoso Central/economia , Cateterismo Venoso Central/instrumentação , Cateterismo Venoso Central/métodos , Derivações do Líquido Cefalorraquidiano/instrumentação , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Cirurgia Assistida por Computador/instrumentação , Adulto Jovem
3.
Minerva Anestesiol ; 83(9): 956-971, 2017 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28492296

RESUMO

Anesthetic management of patients undergoing endovascular procedures for treating intracranial aneurysms or cerebrovascular malformations must consider a number of specific challenges, in addition to those associated with anesthesia for other specialties. In addition to maintenance of physiological stability, manipulation of systemic and cerebral hemodynamic parameters may be required to treat any sudden unexpected catastrophic neurological events. A multidisciplinary group including neuro- and pediatric anesthesiologists, interventional neuroradiologists, neurosurgeons, and a clinical methodologist contributed to this document. This consensus working group from 21 Italian institutions identified open questions regarding the best practices for management of anesthesia during endovascular neuroradiological procedures for intracranial aneurysms and cerebrovascular malformations, and addressed these by formulating practical consensus statements. At the first meeting in November 2015, nine key areas were identified regarding choice of anesthetic, patient monitoring, hemodynamic targets, postoperative care, and the management of neuromuscular blockade, anticoagulant and/or antiplatelet therapy, and special considerations for pediatric patients. Nine subgroups were established and a medical librarian performed literature searches in the Cochrane and MEDLINE/PubMed databases for each group. Groups drafted literature summaries and provisional responses in the form of candidate consensus statements based on evidence, when possible, and clinical experience, when this was lacking. Final wording was agreed at a meeting in April 2016 and where possible evidence was graded using United States Preventive Services Task Force criteria. Consensus (defined as >90% agreement) was based on evidence, clinical experience, clinician preference, feasibility in the Italian healthcare system, and cost/benefit considerations.


Assuntos
Anestesia/métodos , Anestesia/normas , Procedimentos Endovasculares , Aneurisma Intracraniano/cirurgia , Procedimentos Neurocirúrgicos/métodos , Radiologia Intervencionista , Humanos , Malformações Arteriovenosas Intracranianas
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...