Mechanisms of DNA double strand break repair and chromosome aberration formation.

It is widely accepted that unrepaired or misrepaired DNA double strand breaks (DSBs) lead to the formation of chromosome aberrations. DSBs induced in the DNA of higher eukaryotes by endogenous processes or exogenous agents can in principle be repaired either by non-homologous endjoining (NHEJ), or homology directed repair (HDR). The basis on which the selection of the DSB repair pathway is made remains unknown but may depend on the inducing agent, or process. Evaluation of the relative contribution of NHEJ and HDR specifically to the repair of ionizing radiation (IR) induced DSBs is important for our understanding of the mechanisms leading to chromosome aberration formation. Here, we review recent work from our laboratories contributing to this line of inquiry. Analysis of DSB rejoining in irradiated cells using pulsed-field gel electrophoresis reveals a fast component operating with half times of 10-30 min. This component of DSB rejoining is severely compromised in cells with mutations in DNA-PKcs, Ku, DNA ligase IV, or XRCC4, as well as after chemical inhibition of DNA-PK, indicating that it reflects classical NHEJ; we termed this form of DSB rejoining D-NHEJ to signify its dependence on DNA-PK. Although chemical inhibition, or mutation, in any of these factors delays processing, cells ultimately remove the majority of DSBs using an alternative pathway operating with slower kinetics (half time 2-10 h). This alternative, slow pathway of DSB rejoining remains unaffected in mutants deficient in several genes of the RAD52 epistasis group, suggesting that it may not reflect HDR. We proposed that it reflects an alternative form of NHEJ that operates as a backup (B-NHEJ) to the DNA-PK-dependent (D-NHEJ) pathway. Biochemical studies confirm the presence in cell extracts of DNA end joining activities operating in the absence of DNA-PK and indicate the dominant role for D-NHEJ, when active. These observations in aggregate suggest that NHEJ, operating via two complementary pathways, B-NHEJ and D-NHEJ, is the main mechanism through which IR-induced DSBs are removed from the DNA of higher eukaryotes. HDR is considered to either act on a small fraction of IR induced DSBs, or to engage in the repair process at a step after the initial end joining. We propose that high speed D-NHEJ is an evolutionary development in higher eukaryotes orchestrated around the newly evolved DNA-PKcs and pre-existing factors. It achieves within a few minutes restoration of chromosome integrity through an optimized synapsis mechanism operating by a sequence of protein-protein interactions in the context of chromatin and the nuclear matrix. As a consequence D-NHEJ mostly joins the correct DNA ends and suppresses the formation of chromosome aberrations, albeit, without ensuring restoration of DNA sequence around the break. B-NHEJ is likely to be an evolutionarily older pathway with less optimized synapsis mechanisms that rejoins DNA ends with kinetics of several hours. The slow kinetics and suboptimal synapsis mechanisms of B-NHEJ allow more time for exchanges through the joining of incorrect ends and cause the formation of chromosome aberrations in wild type and D-NHEJ mutant cells.

Replication protein A2 phosphorylation after DNA damage by the coordinated action of ataxia telangiectasia-mutated and DNA-dependent protein kinase.

Replication protein A (RPA, also known as human single-stranded DNA-binding protein) is a trimeric, multifunctional protein complex involved in DNA replication, DNA repair, and recombination. Phosphorylation of the RPA2 subunit is observed after exposure of cells to ionizing radiation (IR) and other DNA-damaging agents, which implicates the modified protein in the regulation of DNA replication after DNA damage or in DNA repair. Although ataxia telangiectasia-mutated (ATM) and DNA-dependent protein kinase (DNA-PK) phosphorylate RPA2 in vitro, their role in vivo remains uncertain, and contradictory results have been reported. Here we show that RPA2 phosphorylation is delayed in cells deficient in one of these kinases and completely abolished in wild-type, ATM, or DNA-PK-deficient cells after treatment with wortmannin at a concentration-inhibiting ATM and DNA-PK. Caffeine, an inhibitor of ATM and ATM-Rad3 related (ATR) but not DNA-PK, generates an ataxia-telangiectasia-like response in wild-type cells, prevents completely RPA2 phosphorylation in DNA-PKcs deficient cells, but has no effect on ataxia-telangiectasia cells. These observations rule out ATR and implicate both ATM and DNA-PK in RPA2 phosphorylation after exposure to IR. UCN-01, an inhibitor of protein kinase C, Chk1, and cyclin-dependent kinases, has no effect on IR-induced RPA2 phosphorylation. Because UCN-01 abrogates checkpoint responses, this observation dissociates RPA2 phosphorylation from checkpoint activation. Phosphorylated RPA has a higher affinity for nuclear structures than unphosphorylated RPA suggesting functional alterations in the protein. In an in vitro assay for DNA replication, DNA-PK is the sole kinase phosphorylating RPA2, indicating that processes not reproduced in the in vitro assay are required for RPA2 phosphorylation by ATM. Because RPA2 phosphorylation kinetics are distinct from those of the S phase checkpoint, we propose that DNA-PK and ATM cooperate to phosphorylate RPA after DNA damage to redirect the functions of the protein from DNA replication to DNA repair.

Genetic evidence for the involvement of DNA ligase IV in the DNA-PK-dependent pathway of non-homologous end joining in mammalian cells.

Cells of vertebrates remove DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) from their genome predominantly utilizing a fast, DNA-PKcs-dependent form of non-homologous end joining (D-NHEJ). Mutants with inactive DNA-PKcs remove the majority of DNA DSBs utilizing a slow, DNA-PKcs-independent pathway that does not utilize genes of the RAD52 epistasis group, is error-prone and can therefore be classified as a form of NHEJ (termed basic or B-NHEJ). We studied the role of DNA ligase IV in these pathways of NHEJ. Although biochemical studies show physical and functional interactions between the DNA-PKcs/Ku and the DNA ligase IV/Xrcc4 complexes suggesting operation within the same pathway, genetic evidence to support this notion is lacking in mammalian cells. Primary human fibroblasts (180BR) with an inactivating mutation in DNA ligase IV, rejoined DNA DSBs predominantly with slow kinetics similar to those observed in cells deficient in DNA-PKcs, or in wild-type cells treated with wortmannin to inactivate DNA-PK. Treatment of 180BR cells with wortmannin had only a small effect on DNA DSB rejoining and no effect on cell radiosensitivity to killing although it sensitized control cells to 180BR levels. This is consistent with DNA ligase IV functioning as a component of the D-NHEJ, and demonstrates the unperturbed operation of the DNA-PKcs-independent pathway (B-NHEJ) at significantly reduced levels of DNA ligase IV. In vitro, extracts of 180BR cells supported end joining of restriction endonuclease-digested plasmid to the same degree as extracts of control cells when tested at 10 mM Mg(2+). At 0.5 mM Mg(2+), where only DNA ligase IV is expected to retain activity, low levels of end joining ( approximately 10% of 10 mM) were seen in the control but there was no detectable activity in 180BR cells. Antibodies raised against DNA ligase IV did not measurably inhibit end joining at 10 mM Mg(2+) in either cell line. Thus, in contrast to the situation in vivo, end joining in vitro is dominated by pathways with properties similar to B-NHEJ that do not display a strong dependence on DNA ligase IV, with D-NHEJ retaining only a limited contribution. The implications of these observations to studies of NHEJ in vivo and in vitro are discussed.

DNA-PK-independent rejoining of DNA double-strand breaks in human cell extracts in vitro.

PURPOSE: To investigate the role of DNA-dependent protein kinase (DNA-PK) in the rejoining of ionizing radiation-induced DNA double-strand breaks (dsb). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study employed previously described in vitro assays that utilize nuclei or 'naked' DNA prepared from agarose-embedded cells as a substrate and S-HeLa cell extracts as a source of enzymes. Rejoining of dsb in these assays is absolutely dependent on cell extract and it proceeds, under optimal reaction conditions, to an extent similar to that observed in intact cells. Results were confirmed in a plasmid-based assay for in vitro rejoining of dsb. RESULTS: It is shown that concentrations of wortmannin completely inhibiting DNA-PK activity profoundly affect the rejoining of dsb in vivo, but have no effect on dsb rejoining in vitro. Furthermore, fractionation of cell extracts using ammonium sulphate precipitation, generates protein fractions that are able to support dsb rejoining, despite the fact that they do not contain detectable amounts of either DNA-PKcs or Ku80. Efficient rejoining of dsb in vitro is also observed with extracts of MO59J cells that lack DNA-PK activity. Finally, rejoining of dsb remains unaffected by wortmannin in a plasmid-based assay, and is also detectable with extracts of MO59J cells. CONCLUSIONS: These findings are in contrast with genetic studies demonstrating a requirement for DNA-PK activity for efficient rejoining of dsb in vivo. The difference between in vitro and in vivo results may not be attributed to chromatin structure since wortmannin was without an effect when using nuclei as a substrate. It is speculated that the differences between in vivo and in vitro results can be explained either by assuming the operation of multiple pathways in dsb rejoining, some of which do not require DNA-PK, or by postulating a purely regulatory/damage-sensing role for DNA-PK in intact cells but no direct involvement in dsb rejoining.

In vitro rejoining of DNA double strand breaks: a comparison of genomic-DNA with plasmid-DNA-based assays.

PURPOSE: To evaluate potential similarities between the enzymatic activities required to rejoin DNA double strand breaks (dsb) in an in vitro assay based on genomic DNA and an in vitro assay based on plasmid DNA. Because the latter assay is simpler and faster, it should be preferred for the characterization of repair factors if both assays are found to probe for the same activities. If, however, the enzymatic requirements for dsb rejoining are different between the two assays, both should be used as they are likely to play complementary roles in the characterization of repair factors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cell-free assay has been used, developed to study rejoining DNA dsb induced by radiation in 'naked' DNA prepared from agarose embedded cells using an extract of HeLa cells as a source of enzymes. Also employed was an in vitro assay using the ligation of linearized plasmid DNA to model dsb rejoining. RESULTS: Evidence is presented that, under the conditions employed, different sets of activities are involved in the ligation of linearized plasmid DNA and in the rejoining of dsb in 'naked' genomic DNA. Optimal rejoining of dsb induced in genomic DNA is observed with cytoplasmic cell extract at 37 degrees C, whereas optimal ligation of plasmid DNA is observed with nuclear extract at 25 degrees C. Rejoining of dsb in genomic DNA comes to a near halt at 14 degrees C, but plasmid DNA ligation proceeds at significant rates at this temperature. Furthermore, the activities required for the rejoining of dsb induced in genomic DNA are partly stable to heating at 50 degrees C for 1 h, whereas activities required for the ligation of plasmid DNA are completely inactivated by a similar treatment. Both reactions require ATP for optimal performance, and in both, DNA joining is inhibited at high ATP concentrations. CONCLUSIONS: These observations indicate that the plasmid-and the genomic-DNA-based assays probe for, at least partly, different sets of activities and therefore are expected to play complementary roles in the purification and characterization of activities involved in dsb rejoining.

Replication protein A as a potential regulator of DNA replication in cells exposed to hyperthermia.

It is well known that exposure of cells to heat leads to a drastic inhibition of DNA synthesis as assayed in vivo by the incorporation of radioactive precursors into acid-insoluble material. Here we introduce an SV40 in vitro DNA replication assay and show that this inhibition may be partly due to the activation of a checkpoint in S phase that stalls the initiation of DNA replication by inactivating replication protein A (RPA), an essential factor for replication. The results implicate trans-acting processes in the regulation of DNA replication after heat exposure and suggest that such processes may be an integral part of the normal response to heat insult. The observations extend and complement previous studies that have implicated heat-induced chromatin damage acting in cis as a cause for the observed inhibition of DNA synthesis in cells exposed to hyperthermia. A model is proposed postulating that the presence of single-stranded DNA, or heat-induced damage to chromatin structures directly, albeit passively, inhibits the elongation stages of ongoing DNA replication. It is hypothesized that arrested replication forks subsequently act as signals to activate the S-phase checkpoint that actively inhibits the initiation of new replicons. The ultimate purpose of this response will be the minimization of the toxic consequences of heat-induced damage, as it may delay DNA replication until chromatin conformation has been restored. DNA replication in the presence of chromatin damage has been implicated in the formation of lethal chromosome aberrations observed in cells heated during S phase. The operation of active processes in the regulation of DNA replication in cells exposed to hyperthermia offers new targets for intervention and sensitization of cells to heat.

Down-regulation of DNA replication in extracts of camptothecin-treated cells: activation of an S-phase checkpoint?

Extracts prepared from camptothecin (CPT)-treated cells have a reduced ability to support SV40 DNA replication in vitro. This reduction derives mainly from a reduction in the frequency of initiation events because DNA chain elongation remains practically unchanged. Mixing of extract from nontreated cells with small amounts of extract of CPT-treated cells indicates that the reduction in DNA replication is due to the synthesis/activation of a dominant inhibitor. The observed reduction in DNA replication activity cannot be attributed to inactivation of Topo I, the molecular target of camptothecin, because levels and activity of this protein remain unchanged in extracts of CPT-treated cells and addition of purified Topo I does not restore replication activity. Although replication protein A (RP-A) is phosphorylated in CPT-treated cells, reduced replication may not be caused by RP-A inactivation, because neither loss of phosphorylation nor the addition of recombinant RP-A restore replication activity. We interpret these observations as biochemical evidence for the activation of a checkpoint in S phase and discuss the ramifications of this activation on the mechanism of CPT-induced cytotoxicity.

Incorporation of dinitrophenyl protein L23 into totally reconstituted Escherichia coli 50 S ribosomal subunits and its localization at two sites by immune electron microscopy.

Escherichia coli ribosomal protein L23 was derivatized with [3H]2, 4-dinitrofluorobenzene both at the N terminus and at internal lysines. Dinitrophenyl-L23 (DNP-L23) was taken up into 50 S subunits from a reconstitution mixture containing rRNA and total 50 S protein depleted in L23. Unmodified L23 competed with DNP-L23 for uptake, indicating that each protein form bound in an identical or similar position within the subunit. Modified L23, incorporated at a level of 0.7 or 0.4 DNP groups per 50 S, was localized by electron microscopy of subunits complexed with antibodies to dinitrophenol. Antibodies were seen at two major sites with almost equal frequency. One site is beside the central protuberance, in a region previously identified as the peptidyltransferase center. The second location is at the base of the subunit, in the area of the exit site from which the growing peptide leaves the ribosome. Models derived from image reconstruction show hollows or canyons in the subunit and a tunnel that links the transferase and exit sites. Our results indicate that L23 is at the subunit interior, with separate elements of the protein at the subunit surface at or near both ends of this tunnel.

Incorporation of dinitrophenyl derivatives of proteins S6, S13, S16, and S18 into the 30 S subunit of Escherichia coli ribosomes by total reconstitution.

This is the third paper in a series (Olah, T. V., Olson, H. M., Glitz, D. G., and Cooperman, B. S. (1988) J. Biol. Chem. 263, 4795-4800; Olson, H. M., Olah, T., Cooperman, B. S., and Glitz, D. G. (1988) J. Biol. Chem. 263, 4801-4806) describing the use of 2,4-dinitrophenyl (DNP) derivatives of Escherichia coli 30 S ribosomal proteins to locate the positions of these proteins within the 30 S subunit by immune electron microscopy. In it we describe the derivatization of proteins S6, S13, S16, and S18 with [3H]2,4-dinitrofluorobenzene, identify the nature of the derivatized amino acids within each protein, and demonstrate that each DNP protein, denoted DNP-Sx, can be taken up into a reconstituted 30 S subunit when added to a reconstitution mixture containing 16 S rRNA and total 30 S protein depleted in Sx. We further demonstrate that each DNP-Sx binds within the 30 S subunit in a position identical or similar to that of the unmodified Sx protein, as judged by its meeting one or more of the following three criteria: (i) unmodified Sx competes with the uptake of DNP-Sx into 30 S subunits; (ii) DNP-Sx restores functional activity to those single protein omission reconstitution particles lacking full activity; (iii) DNP-Sx induces the uptake of proteins into 30 S subunits that depend on the presence of Sx. The fourth paper in this series (Montesano-Roditis, L., McWilliams, R., Glitz, D. G., Olah, T. V., Perrault, A. R., and Cooperman, B. S. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 18701-18709), which follows this one, describes the localization of the DNP-Sx proteins within the 30 S subunit by immune electron microscopy.

Placement of dinitrophenyl-modified ribosomal proteins in totally reconstituted Escherichia coli 30 S subunits. Localization of proteins S6, S13, S16, and S18 by immune electron microscopy.

Purified Escherichia coli ribosomal proteins S6, S13, S16, and S18 were dinitrophenylated at their amino termini and/or at one or more internal lysine residues. Each dinitrophenyl protein was then separately incorporated into reconstituted small ribosomal subunits. Modified proteins were localized on the 30 S subunit surface by electron microscopy of reconstituted subunits complexed with antibodies to dinitrophenol (DNP). DNP protein S13 was placed on the subunit head above the platform and on the surface that faces the large subunit. DNP-S18 was localized to the subunit platform below the tip and in a region associated with binding to 50 S subunits. DNP proteins S6 and S16 were both localized near the junction of the subunit body and platform; DNP-S6 was available to antibody in 70 S ribosomes and was placed on the cytoplasm-facing side of the subunit in an area that overlaps the platform and body of the particle. DNP-S16 in 70 S ribosomes was not bound by antibody. It was localized to the 30 S body near its junction with the platform and on the surface facing the 50 S particle. The results complement and clarify data obtained using other approaches.

The protein composition of reconstituted 30S ribosomal subunits: the effects of single protein omission.

Using reverse phase HPLC, we have been able to quantify the protein compositions of reconstituted 30S ribosomal subunits, formed either with the full complement of 30S proteins in the reconstitution mix or with a single protein omitted. We denote particles formed in the latter case as SPORE (single protein omission reconstitution) particles. An important goal in 30S reconstitution studies is the formation of reconstituted subunits having uniform protein composition, preferably corresponding to one copy of each protein per reconstituted particle. Here we describe procedures involving variation of the protein:rRNA ratio that approach this goal. In SPORE particles the omission of one protein often results in the partial loss in uptake of other proteins. We also describe procedures to increase the uptake of such proteins into SPORE particles, thus enhancing the utility of the SPORE approach in defining the role of specific proteins in 30S structure and function. The losses of proteins other than the omitted protein provide a measure of protein:protein interaction within the 30S subunit. Most of these losses are predictable on the basis of other such measures. However, we do find evidence for several long-range protein:protein interactions (S6:S3, S6:S12, S10:S16, and S6:S4) that have not been described previously.