Application and internal validation of lung ultrasound score in COVID-19 setting: The ECOVITA observational study.

BACKGROUND: The severe acute respiratory syndrome Coronarovirus-2 associated still causes a significant number of deaths and hospitalizations mainly by the development of respiratory failure. We aim to validate lung ultrasound score in order to predict mortality and the severity of the clinical course related to the need of respiratory support. METHODS: In this prospective multicenter hospital-based cohort study, all adult patients with diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection, performed by real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction were included. Upon admission, all patients underwent blood gas analysis and lung ultrasound by expert operators. The acquisition of ultrasound scan was performed on 12 peculiar anatomic landmarks of the chest. Lung ultrasound findings were classified according to a scoring method, ranging 0 to 3: Score 0: normal A-lines. Score 1: multiple separated B-lines. Score 2: coalescent B-lines, alteration of pleural line. Score 3: consolidation area. RESULTS: One thousand and seven patients were included in statistical analysis (male 62.4 %, mean age 66.3). Oxygen support was needed in 811 (80.5 %) patients. The median ultrasound score was 24 and the risk of having more invasive respiratory support increased in relation to higher values score computed. Lung ultrasound score showed negative strong correlation (rho: -0.71) with the P/F ratio and a significant association with in-hospital mortality (OR 1.11, 95 %CI 1.07-1.14; p < 0.001), even after adjustment with the following variables (age, sex, P/F ratio, SpO2, lactate, hypertension, chronic renal failure, diabetes, and obesity). CONCLUSIONS: The novelty of this research corroborates and validates the 12-field lung ultrasound score as tool for predicting mortality and severity clinical course in COVID-19 patients. Baseline lung ultrasound score was associated with in-hospital mortality and requirement of intensive respiratory support and predict the risk of IOT among COVID-19 patients.

Influence of allergic status and nasal polyposis on long-term Benralizumab response in eosinophilic severe asthma.

Objective: It is unclear whether Benralizumab effectiveness in severe eosinophilic asthma can be influenced by nasal polyposis (NP) or allergic status associations. We evaluated whether Benralizumab long-term efficacy in asthma outcomes could be different in subjects with atopy (SAEA) compared to the effectiveness in those without allergies (SNAEA) and in individuals with NP compared to those without NP. Methods: This observational retrospective study considered 95 consecutive patients divided into allergic (SAEA; n:65[68.4%]; skin prick tests positive [SPT] and/or IgE values ≥100 UI/mL), and non-allergic (SNAEA; n:30[31.6%], SPT negative and normal IgE levels<100 UI/mL). Overall population was also divided into two groups according to NP presence (NP+:39[41%] and NP-:56[59%]). Benralizumab treatment mean was19.7±7.2 months (range 12-35). Results: No differences in Benralizumab effectiveness were found in asthma outcomes in patients with/without NP. SNOT-22 improvement was higher in NP+ (-22±24) compared to NP- groups (6.33±15.5;p=0.055). FEV1 (16.33±19.22%), ACT(7.45±3.95) increases and frequency of SABA use (3.37±4.99) reduction were higher in SAEA compared to what obtained in non-allergic subjects (FEV1:8.15±15.6%,p=0.043; ACT:4.89±3.57,p=0.005; SABA use:-1.16±1.84;p=0.015). 93.8% of SAEA patients whereas only 72.2% of SNAEA individuals reduced OC doses at least half after Benralizumab (p=0.035). These results were partially confirmed by linear regression models showing associations between allergic status and FEV1, ACT and SABA use changes (ß=8.37;p=0.048, ß=2.056;p=0.033 and ß=-2.184;p=0.042 respectively). Conclusion: Benralizumab effectiveness in asthma appears to be independent of NP presence. The allergic eosinophilic disease, compared to just eosinophilic asthma, may be a more severe phenotype. Benralizumab may have greater efficacy in SAEA on some outcomes.

Severe asthma and long-term Benralizumab effectiveness in real-life.

OBJECTIVE: Long-term efficacy of Benralizumab in real life is not clearly known. We assessed the long-term effectiveness persistence to anti-IL-5R treatment in a group of severe eosinophilic asthmatics. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 95 individuals affected by severe asthma (36 males  ̶ 37.9%; mean age 58.1 ± 12.2) treated with Benralizumab (mean time 19.7 ± 7.2 months, range 12-35). Outcomes were evaluated at the beginning and at the end of patients' treatment periods. RESULTS: Mean baseline blood eosinophils were 897.5 ± 720.1 cells/µL (11 ± 5.6%) decreasing to 7.4 ± 20.6 cells/µL (0.97 ± 0.26%; p < 0.0001) after Benralizumab. FENO likewise decreased from 63.9 ± 68.4 to 28.4 ± 23.6 ppb, while FEV1% significantly improved (p < 0.0001). Mean FEF25-75 also increased from 45.8 ± 24.6% to 60.7 ± 24.6%, whereas RAW dropped from 202.15 ± 109.6% to 135.2 ± 54.75% (p < 0.0001). Also, lung volumes greatly decreased. ACT/ACQ significantly improved, while exacerbations number fell from 4.1 ± 2.4, before anti-IL-5R, to 0.33 ± 0.77, after treatment (p < 0.0001). Rhinitis severity levels and SNOT-22 also changed favorably. Patients that took long-term OCs were 71.6% before treatment, decreasing to 23.2% after Benralizumab (p < 0.0001), with an OCs dose reduction from 14.8 ± 8.9 to 1.45 ± 2.8 mg/day (p < 0.0001). 51.6% of subjects used SABA as needed before Benralizumab, falling to 4.2% after treatment. Several patients showed a reduction of ICS doses, SABA use and maintenance therapy step-down. Clinical/biological response with anti-IL-5R remained constant or even improved in terms of exacerbations or maintenance therapy reductions over time. On the contrary, FEF25-75% improvement slowed down in the long-term. No relationship was found between baseline blood eosinophil number and therapeutic response. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term Benralizumab effectiveness persistence in all outcomes in real life was confirmed.

C-reactive protein but not procalcitonin may predict antibiotic response and outcome in infections following major abdominal surgery.

We aimed to evaluate the usefulness of C-reactive protein (CRP) and procalcitonin (PCT) as markers of infection, sepsis and as predictors of antibiotic response after non-emergency major abdominal surgery. We enrolled, from June 2015 to June 2019, all patients who underwent surgery due to abdominal infection (peritoneal abscess, peritonitis) or having sepsis episode after surgical procedures (i.e. hepatectomy, bowel perforation, pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD), segmental resection of the duodenum (SRD) or biliary reconstruction in a Tertiary Care Hospital. Serum CRP (cut-off value < 5 mg/L) and PCT (cut-off value < 0.1mcg/L) were measured in the day when fever was present or within 24 h after abdominal surgery. Both markers were assessed every 48 h to follow-up antibiotic response and disease evolution up to disease resolution. We enrolled a total of 260 patients underwent non-emergency major abdominal surgery and being infected or developing infection after surgical procedure with one or more microbes (55% mixed Gram-negative infection including Klebsiella KPC, 35% Gram-positive infection, 10% with Candida infection), 58% of patients had ICU admission for at least 96 h, 42% of patients had fast track ICU (48 h). In our group of patients, we found that PCT had a trend to increase after surgical procedure; particularly, those undergoing liver surgery had higher PCT than those underwent different abdominal surgery (U Mann-Whitney p < 0.05). CRP rapidly increase after surgery in those developing infection and showed a statistical significant decrease within 48 h in those subject being responsive to antibiotic treatment and having a clinical response within 10 days independently form the pathogens (bacterial or fungal). Further we found that those having CRP higher than 250 mg/L had a reduced percentage of success treatment at 10 days compared to those < 250 mg/mL (U Mann-Whitney p < 0.05). PCT did not show any variation according to treatment response. CRP in our cohort seems to be a useful marker to predict antibiotic response in those undergoing non-emergency abdominal surgery, while PCT seem to be increased in those having major liver surgery, probably due to hepatic production of cytokines.

Clinical application of lung ultrasound score on COVID-19 setting: a regional experience in Southern Italy.

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to assess the correlation between LUS Soldati proposed score and clinical presentation, course of disease and the possible need of ventilation support/intensive care. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All consecutive patients with laboratory confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection and hospitalized in two COVID Centers were enrolled. All patients performed blood gas analysis and lung ultrasound (LUS) at admission. The LUS acquisition was based on standard sequence of 14 peculiar anatomic landmarks with a score between 0-3 based on impairment of LUS picture. Total score was computed with their sum with a total score ranging 0 to 42, according to Soldati LUS score. We evaluated the course of hospitalization until either discharge or death, the ventilatory support and the transition in intensive care if needed. RESULTS: One hundred and fifty-six patients were included in the final analysis. Most of patients presented moderate-to-severe respiratory failure (FiO2 <20%, PaO2 <60 mmHg) and consequent recommendation to invasive mechanic ventilation (CPAP/NIV/OTI). The median ultrasound thoracic score was 28 (IQR 18-36) and most of patients could be ascertained either in a score 2 (40%) or score 3 pictures (24.4%). The bivariate correlation analysis displayed statistically significant and high positive correlations between the LUS score and the following parameters: ventilation (rho=0.481, p<0.001), lactates (rho=0.464, p<0.001), dyspnea (rho=0.398, p=0.001) mortality (rho=0.410, p=0.001). Conversely, P/F (rho= -0.663, p<0.001), pH (rho = -0.363, p=0.003) and pO2 (rho = -0.400 p=0.001) displayed significant negative correlations. CONCLUSIONS: LUS score improve the workflow and provide an optimal management both in early diagnosis and prognosis of COVID-19 related lung pathology.

Factors reducing omalizumab response in severe asthma.

BACKGROUND: Despite adding Omalizumab to conventional therapy, several severe asthmatics still show poor disease control. We investigated the factors that may affect a reduced Omalizumab response in a large population of severe asthmatics. METHODS: 340 patients were retrospectively evaluated. FEV1%, FVC%, Asthma Control Test (ACT), fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FENO), possible step-downs/step-ups of concomitant therapies, exacerbations, disease control levels, ICS doses and SABA use, observed at the end of treatment, were considered as a response to Omalizumab. RESULTS: Age was an independent risk factor for a reduced response concerning FEV1%, FVC%, ACT and for a lower asthma control. Obesity (vs normal weight) was a determinant condition for exacerbations (OR:3.114[1.509-6.424], p = 0.002), for a disease partial/no control (OR:2.665[1.064-6.680], p = 0.036), for excessive SABA use (OR:4.448[1.837-10.768], p = 0.002) and for an unchanged/increased level of concomitant asthma medications. Furthermore, obesity also reduced the response in FEV1 (ß = -6.981,p = 0.04), FVC (ß = -11.689,p = 0.014) and ACT (ß = -2.585, p = 0.027) and was associated with a higher FENO level (ß = 49.045,p = 0.040). Having at least one comorbidity was a risk factor for exacerbations (OR:1.383[1.128-1.697], p = 0.008) and for an ACT <20 (OR:2.410[1.071-3.690], p = 0.008). Specifically, chronic heart disease was associated with both a lower ACT and FVC% whereas gastroesophageal reflux with a partial/no asthma control. Nasal polyps were a predisposing factor leading both to exacerbations and to the use of higher inhaled corticosteroids doses. Moreover, smoking habits, pollen or dog/cat dander co-sensitizations may negatively influence Omalizumab response. CONCLUSION: Age, obesity, comorbidities, smoking habits, nasal polyps, allergic poly-sensitization might reduce Omalizumab effectiveness independently to other asthma-influencing factors.

Safety of new DAAs for chronic HCV infection in a real life experience: role of a surveillance network based on clinician and hospital pharmacist.

BACKGROUND: Direct Antiviral Agents (DAAs) for HCV therapy represents a step ahead in the cure of chronic hepatitis C. Notwithstanding the promising results in several clinical trials, few data are available on adverse effects in real life settings. METHODS: We have evaluated 170 patients with persistent infection and on those eligible to treatment we have followed up them through a network managed by clinician and hospital pharmacist. RESULTS: According to our data we have found that 41% (32 out of 78) of enrolled patients experienced adverse reactions, of these 40% were in those under 65 years while 60% was in patients older than 65 years, SVR was achieved in 88% of the patients (including drop-out). We had 4 drop-out treatment due to major adverse reaction (heart and lung related). CONCLUSION: Even if new antiviral drugs seem to be promising, according to SVR, they require careful follow-up, possibly managed by clinician and hospital pharmacist, to avoid unrecognized side effects which may affect adherence and the real impact of these drugs on chronically infected subjects.

Effects of omalizumab in severe asthmatics across ages: A real life Italian experience.

BACKGROUND: This retrospective study aimed at evaluating long-term effects of Omalizumab in elderly asthmatics in a real-life setting. METHODS: 105 consecutive severe asthmatics (GINA step 4-5; mean FEV1% predicted:66 ± 15.7) treated with Omalizumab for at least 1 year (treatment mean duration 35.1 ± 21.7 months) were divided into 3 groups according to their age at Omalizumab treatment onset: 18-39, 40-64 and ≥ 65 years. RESULTS: Comorbidities, number of overweight/obese subjects and patients with late-onset asthma were more frequent among older people. A similar reduction of inhaled corticosteroids dosage and SABA on-demand therapy was observed in all groups during Omalizumab treatment; a similar FEV1 increased was also observed. Asthma Control Test (ACT) improved significantly (p < 0.001) in the three groups, increasing from 15 [IQR:12-18] to 24 [IQR:22-25] in younger subjects, from 14 [IQR:10-16] to 21 [IQR:20-23] in the 40-64-year-group and from 15 [IQR:12-16] to 20 [IQR:18-22] in elderly patients where improvement was lower (p = 0.039) compared to younger people. Asthma exacerbations decreased significantly after Omalizumab but the percentage of exacerbation-free patients was higher in younger people (76.9%) compared to middle aged patients (49.2%) and the elderly (29%) (p = 0.049). After Omalizumab treatment, the risk for exacerbations was lower in subjects aged 40-64 (OR = 0.284 [CI95% = 0.098-0.826], p = 0.021) and 18-39 (OR = 0.133 [CI95% = 0.026-0.678], p = 0.015), compared to elderly asthmatics. Also, a significantly reduced ACT improvement (ß = -1.070; p = 0.046) passing from each age class was observed. CONCLUSION: Omalizumab improves all asthma outcomes independently of age, although the magnitude of the effects observed in the elderly seems to be lower than in the other age groups.

Antifungal prophylaxis with liposomal amphotericin B and caspofungin in high-risk patients after liver transplantation: impact on fungal infections and immune system.

Antifungal prophylaxis may be required in high-risk patients undergoing liver transplantation and for that reason we aimed to verify its role and its related impact on the graft. From January 2006 throughout 2012, 250 liver transplants were evaluated and 54 patients identified as being at higher risk were randomly selected to undergo the following schedule: 28 patients received liposomal amphotericin B and 26 received caspofungin. We evaluated, throughout 12 months, renal and liver function tests, bacterial and fungal infection episodes, and intensive care unit (ICU) stay, as well as the Th1 and Th2 cytokine network. Differences were analyzed according to non-parametric tests (two-tailed p values). Neither of the groups showed episodes of invasive fungal infection during the 12 months follow-up; however, patients receiving prophylaxis with liposomal amphotericin B had reduced episodes of bacterial infections coupled with an improved immune system response compared with those receiving caspofungin. Finally, a reduced stay in the ICU was also observed. In conclusion, even if the results of liposomal amphotericin B and caspofungin prophylaxis strategies did not differ in terms of invasive fungal infection rate, patients receiving prophylaxis with liposomal amphotericin B had a reduced ICU stay and an improved Th2 status, as well as a reduced number of post-transplant bacterial infections. Further studies are required to better address and evaluate these findings.

Telbivudine prophylaxis for hepatitis B virus recurrence after liver transplantation improves renal function.

INTRODUCTION: Renal impairment after liver transplantation represents an important issue in the management of transplantation patients, particularly when those subjects may need prophylaxis for fungal or viral infection. Herein we report our experience with 12 transplantation patients receiving telbivudine 600 mg/d while on the waiting list, followed by treatment for 18 months after liver transplantation, showing an improvement on their renal function during the follow-up period. METHODS: Our series consisted of men with hepatitis B virus (HBV)-related end-stage liver disease. The viral load decreased rapidly while on the waiting list once the patient was started on antiviral treatment. Those subjects were compared with 12 patients on lamivudine prophylaxis. All patients were evaluated for liver and renal function, immunosuppression trough levels, and creatine phosphokinase (CPK) before liver transplantation (T0) and at 3, 6, 12, and 18 months (T3, T6, T12, T18). RESULTS: All patients received a calcineurin inhibitor immunosuppression-based regimen. Creatinine clearance (Modification of Diet in Renal Disease) was 67 mL/min at T0, with a statistically significant improvement after month 6 compared with those on lamivudine and with the value at the beginning of the prophylaxis (Mann-Whitney U test P<.05). Neither CPK nor transaminase serum levels increased throughout the study period. Once HBV DNA was cleared while on the waiting list, it remained negative throughout the follow-up period. CONCLUSIONS: Telbivudine prophylaxis for HBV is safe and effective, without any significant deleterious effect on the liver; on the contrary, it seems to improve renal function after liver transplantation through 18 months. Further studies and larger series are warranted to confirm these findings.

Management of immunosuppression and antiviral treatment before and after heart transplant for HIV-associated dilated cardiomyopathy.

Infection with HIV may lead to the development of cardiomyopathy as improved antiretroviral regimens continue to prolong patient life. However, advanced therapeutic options, such as heart transplant, have until recently been precluded to HIV-positive persons. A favorable long-term outcome has been obtained after kidney or liver transplant in HIV-positive recipients fulfilling strict virological and clinical criteria. We recently reported the first heart transplant in a HIV-infected patient carried out in our center. In this article, we detail the major challenges we faced with the management of antiretroviral and immunosuppressive treatments over the first 3 years post-transplant. The patient had developed dilated cardiomyopathy while on antiretroviral treatment with zidovudine, lamivudine and efavirenz. He was in WHO Stage 1 of HIV infection and had normal CD4+ count and persistently undetectable HIV-RNA. In spite of cardiac resynchronization therapy and maximal drug therapy, the patient progressed to end stage heart failure, requiring heart transplant. He was placed on a standard immune suppressive protocol including cyclosporine A and everolimus. Despite its potential pharmacokinetic interaction with efavirenz, everolimus was chosen to reduce the long-term risk of opportunistic neoplasia. Plasma levels of both drugs were monitored and remained within the target range, although high doses of everolimus were needed. There were no infectious, neoplastic or metabolic complications during a 3-year follow-up. In summary, our experience supports previous data showing that cardiac transplantation should not be denied to carefully selected HIV patients. Careful management of drug interactions and adverse events is mandatory.

Side-to-side cavocavostomy in adult piggyback liver transplantation.

OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to perform a retrospective study that described the anastomosis technique as well as the complications of side-to-side cavo-caval reconstruction. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From June 1998 to April 2011, we performed 284 liver transplantations including 10 adults with live donor organs. In all cases but 2 (272), cavo-caval reconstruction was performed using side-to-side cavo-caval (STSCC) anastomosis. In 19 cases (6.9%), we also carried out an end-to-side temporary porto-caval shunt (TPCS). In 17 cases (6.2%) the technique was performed for retransplantation. RESULTS: STSCC anastomosis was technically feasible in all but 2 cases, regardless of the recipient's vena cava, anatomic factors, or graft size. Mean operative time for the STSCC was 13 minutes (range, 6-25). Routine Doppler ultrasonography was performed intraoperatively at the end of the surgery. There was no case of cava stump thrombosis. Complications associated with this technique were limited to 2 patients. One complication was torsion due to donor graft/recipient mismatch, which was successfully treated surgically by falciform ligament fixation. The second complication was only evident by sinusoidal congestion and was managed nonoperatively. Seventeen cases were uneventful for retransplant recipients. CONCLUSIONS: STSCC during piggyback liver transplantation is safe and can be performed in the retransplantation setting, with a low incidence of venous outflow obstruction that can be associated with the traditional piggyback technique. Our data suggest that donor graft to recipient mismatch is not an absolute contraindication when proper body size match is considered. A wide anastomosis with typical recipient hepatic vein inclusion is warranted with routine postanastomotic Doppler ultrasonography.

Role of liposomal amphotericin B prophylaxis after liver transplantation compared with fluconazole for high-risk patients. impact on infections and mortality within one year.

BACKGROUND: Fungal infections are still one of the most important issue in liver transplant patients, contributing considerably to both morbidity and mortality. Few studies have been published comparing antifungal protocols for their impact on liver transplant (OLT) patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of liposomal amphotericin B compared with fluconazole prophylaxis on morbidity and mortality after liver transplantation. METHODS: We evaluated all 44 patients undergoing OLT from January 2006 to January 2009 who were enrolled and randomized to undergo treatment with Amphotericin B (3 mg/kg/d; group A = 25 patients) or fluconazole (800 mg Loading dose and thereafter 400 mg/d according to renal parameters and immunosuppressant trough levels; group B = 18 patients) for at least 7 to 14 days with 12 months follow-up after liver transplantation. A multivariate analysis assessed factors associated with infections and mortality. RESULTS: Neither antifungal prophylaxis was associated with a fungal episode; however, group A patients experienced fewer bacterial infectious episodes (Mann-Whitney U test P < .05). Furthermore, no renal impairment was observed in either groups. Nonetheless, patients undergoing fluconazole prophylaxis showed significant increases in immunosuppressive trough levels requiring dose adjustment. CONCLUSION: We observed comparable results of fluconazole and liposomal amphotericin B to prevent invasive fungal infections throughout 12 months after surgery. The latter drug was associated with fewer bacterial infections after liver transplantation.

Telbivudin as prophylaxis for hepatitis B virus recurrence after liver transplantation: a case series in single-center experience.

BACKGROUND: Hepatitis B virus (HBV) recurrence after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) represents a severe condition that requires prophylaxis with specific immunoglobulin and lamivudine. Few studies have addressed the efficiency of other effective antiviral drugs posttransplantation or their impact on early renal function after transplantation. Herein, we have reported experience among seven transplanted patients prescribed Telbivudin (600 mg/d) while on the waiting list followed by treatment for 3 months after OLT. METHODS: Our series consisted of men with HBV-related end-stage liver disease. Once the patient started antiviral treatment, the viral load decreased rapidly while on the waiting list. All patients were evaluated for liver and renal functions immunosuppressive drug trough levels, CPK before (T0), as well as at 1 month (T1), and 3 months after liver transplant (T3). RESULTS: All patients received a CNI-based regimen. Their mean creatinine clearance (MDRD) was 72.5 mL/min at T0, 69.2 mL/min at T1, and 71.0 mL/min at T3. Neither CPK or serum transaminase levels increased throughout the study. Once HBV-DNA was cleared while on the waiting list, it remained negative throughout the follow-up period. CONCLUSION: Telbivudin prophylaxis for HBV was safe and effective without any significant deleterious effect on liver or renal function tests after liver transplantation.

Cytomegalovirus infection after liver transplantation: prophylaxis and preemptive treatment--a single-center experience.

BACKGROUND: Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection represents one of the most frequent opportunistic infections following solid-organ transplantation. The incidence and severity of CMV infection depend on the immunosuppressive regimen, the CMV serostatus of donor and recipient, and the type of transplant. METHODS: We evaluated CMV infection rates during the last 2 years in our center: March 2007 to March 2009. We enrolled 55 patients-13 females and 42 males-who underwent liver transplantation (OLT) due to hepatitis C virus (HCV) cirrhosis (n = 9), hepatitis B virus (HBV) cirrhosis (n = 5) HCC both on HCV and HBV cirrhosis (n = 37), or autoimmune disease (n = 4). Fifty percent of the patients received tacrolimus (TRL) and the others cyclosporine (CsA), both dosed according to weight. All patients received oral acyclovir (400 mg/td or less, adapted to renal function) as herpes simplex prophylaxis for 6 months. CMV prophylaxis prescribed CMV- hyperimmunoglobulin on postoperative days 1 and 7. CMV infection was monitored using polymerase chain reaction (PCR <1000 IU/mL) according to the following schedule: every week for the first month, every 2 weeks from month 2 to 3 and monthly from month 4 to 6. Patients were treated when three positive PCR results not affected by immunosuppressive dose reduction or when the PCR showed DNA greater than three times the limit of detection. CMV treatment stipulated valgancyclovir (900 mg twice daily) until three consecutive PCRs were negative or for 3 months dosed according to renal function. PCR was measured every 2 weeks during treatment. RESULTS: Among the patients who were all D(+)/R(+) (CMV-Immunoglobulin G [IgG](+)/IgG(+)). 10 required treatment (18%) within 3 months from OLT. There subjects were prescribed TRL (n = 4) or CsA (n = 6). No renal impairment was observed among treated patients. Of those having the infection, one died due to other causes-sepsis from candida at 5 months after OLT. CONCLUSION: CMV-hyperimmunoglobulin on postoperative days 1 and 7 did not confer protection for CMV among OLT patients. Preemptive treatment with intravenous gancyclovir plus valgancyclovir per os seemed to be useful and safe in infected patients requiring treatment.

Rapid virological response in peripheral blood mononuclear cells with an increase of hepatitis C virus-specific interferon-gamma production predisposes to sustained virological response in patients with chronic hepatitis C genotype 1 undergoing treatment with pegylated-interferon alpha 2a plus ribavirin.

OBJECTIVE: Viral load evaluation in plasma, after 1 month of treatment, represents one of the most important parameters to predict treatment response during interferon (IFN) treatment in chronic hepatitis C (CHC). It has been proven that hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA may be present in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) but few studies have investigated the viral load in PBMCs during treatment. The aim of this study was to evaluate HCV RNA in PBMCs during therapy with pegylated-IFN-alpha2a plus ribavirin and whether its clearance in PBMCs may induce a treatment response. Furthermore, we also analyzed the IFN-gamma and interleukin (IL)-4 responses of PBMCs during therapy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We studied 35 patients with CHC genotype 1 undergoing antiviral treatment with pegylated IFN-alpha2a 180 microg weekly plus ribavirin 1000 mg/daily. In these patients we evaluated HCV-RNA in plasma and PBMCs, IFN-gamma and IL-4 before treatment, after 1, 3 and 12 months of treatment and 6 months after the end of treatment. RESULTS: We found that rapid virological clearance of HCV-RNA in PBMCs with a restored and improved HCV-specific IFN-gamma response was statistically significantly higher in those with a sustained virological response (SVR). CONCLUSION: Patients having a rapid virological response in PBMCs with an improved Th1 network achieve a complete SVR, whereas those having viral clearance only in plasma without a restored Th1 network have a relapse.