RESUMO
Objective: The extent to which the healthy hemiface dynamically contributes to facial synchronization during facial rehabilitation has been largely unstudied. This study compares the synchronization of both hemifaces in severe Bell's palsy patients who either received facial rehabilitation called "Mirror Effect Plus Protocol" (MEPP) or basic counseling. Methods: Baseline and 1-year postonset data from 39 patients (19 = MEPP and 20 = basic counseling) were retrospectively analyzed using Emotrics+, a software that generates facial metrics with artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms. Paired t-tests were used for intrasubject comparisons of hemifaces, and mixed model analysis were used to compare between groups. Results: For voluntary movements, a significant difference in favor of the MEPP group was only found for smiling (p = 0.025*). However, at 1-year postonset, the control group showed significant variability between hemifaces for most synkinesis measurements [nasolabial fold (p = 0.029*); eye area (p = 0.043*); palpebral fissure (p = 0.011*)]. Conclusion: In this study, a better synchronization of both hemifaces was found in the MEPP group. Interestingly, motor adaptation in movement amplitude of the healthy hemiface seemed to contribute to this synchronization in MEPP patients. Further studies are needed to standardize the procedure of AI measurements and to adapt it for clinical use.
