Liver venous deprivation compared to portal vein embolization to induce hypertrophy of the future liver remnant before major hepatectomy: A single center experience.

BACKGROUND: To assess the safety and efficacy of liver venous deprivation (simultaneous hepatic vein embolization with portal vein embolization) compared with portal vein embolization alone before major hepatectomy in patients with small future liver remnant. METHODS: We assessed all consecutive patients who underwent ipsilateral liver venous deprivation before major hepatectomy (>4 Couinaud's segments) at the University Hospital Lausanne from 2016 to 2018. Postembolization, volumetric analysis after liver venous deprivation and postoperative outcomes were compared with patients who underwent portal vein embolization alone (portal vein embolization group) from 2010 to 2016. RESULTS: During the study period, 21 patients underwent liver venous deprivation and 39 portal vein embolization alone. In the liver venous deprivation versus portal vein embolization groups, dropout rate owing to disease progression was 1 of 21 vs 9 of 39 (P = .053). There were no per procedural complications after liver venous deprivation and no difference in the postoperative outcomes. Future liver remnant hypertrophy was greater in the liver venous deprivation group (median 135%, interquartile range: 123%-154%) than in the portal vein embolization group (median 124%, interquartile range: 107%-140%) at a median time of 22 days after liver venous deprivation vs 26 days after portal vein embolization (P = .034). The median kinetic growth rate was also greater (2.9%/week, interquartile range: 1.9-4.3% vs 1.4%/week, interquartile range: 0.7-2.1%; P < .001). CONCLUSION: Ipsilateral liver venous deprivation before major hepatectomy is safe and seems to induce a greater and faster future liver remnant hypertrophy than after portal vein embolization alone. More data are needed to analyze the impact of liver venous deprivation on tumor growth.

Right upper lobe anatomy revisited: a computed tomography scan study.

BACKGROUND: The double lumen tube (DLT) has become the most popular way to isolate the lungs for thoracic surgery. The variable anatomy of the right main stem bronchus (RMSB) seems to be the main reason clinicians are unwilling to use the right-sided DLT (R-DLT). The factors that could compromise the adequate ventilation of the right lung are mostly the variable length of the RMSB and the misalignment of the lateral orifice of the R-DLT in regard to the right upper lobe bronchus (RULB). The objectives of this study were to validate an alternative method to estimate the RMSB length, and to determine the distribution of the angulation of the ostium of the RULB. METHODS: From high-resolution computed tomography scans of the thorax of 106 consecutive patients, the length of the RMSB was measured using Kim's method and the carina-to-carina method. The angle between the RULB origin and the lateral aspect of the RMSB was also measured. All these measurements were correlated and inter-observer variation documented. RESULTS: From the Kim's method, the mean (standard deviation [SD]) length of the RMSB was 25.5 (4.7) mm. From the alternative carina-to-carina method, the mean (SD) length of RMSB was 29.4 (4.6) mm. The inter-observer agreement was substantial with both methods (Kim's method: intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] = 0.84; carina-to-carina method: ICC = 0.95). Both measures were closely related (ICC = 0.93; P < 0.001). The RULB presented a wide range angulation [mean (SD), 0.1 (9.5)°; range, -28.6 to 21.2]. CONCLUSION: These anatomic observations provide a better understanding of the variable anatomy of the right bronchial tree and may guide thoracic anesthesiologists in the choice of the best lung isolation device for their patients.

RéSUMé: CONTEXTE: Le tube double lumière (TDL) est actuellement la modalité la plus populaire pour isoler les poumons lors d'une chirurgie thoracique. L'anatomie variable de la bronche souche droite (BSD) semble être la principale raison qui freine l'engouement des cliniciens à utiliser un TDL droit (TDL-d). Les facteurs pouvant compliquer la ventilation adéquate du poumon droit sont surtout la longueur variable de la BSD et le mauvais alignement entre l'orifice latéral du TDL-d et de la bronche lobaire supérieure droite (BLSD). Les objectifs de cette étude étaient de valider une méthode alternative d'estimation de la longueur de la BSD ainsi que de déterminer la distribution de l'angulation de l'orifice de la BLSD. MéTHODE: En nous basant sur des images de tomodensitométrie (TDM) thoracique haute résolution de 106 patients consécutifs, la longueur de la BSD a été mesurée à l'aide de la méthode de Kim et de la méthode de carène à carène. L'angle entre l'origine de la BLSD et l'aspect latéral de la BSD a également été mesuré. Toutes ces mesures ont ensuite été corrélées et la variation inter-observateur documentée. RéSULTATS: En se fondant sur la méthode de Kim, la longueur moyenne (écart type [ÉT]) de la BSD était de 25,5 (4,7) mm. En se fondant sur la méthode alternative de carène à carène, la longueur moyenne (ÉT) de la BSD était de 29,4 (4,6) mm. La concordance inter-observateur était élevée lors de l'utilisation des deux méthodes (méthode de Kim : coefficient de corrélation intraclasse [CCI] = 0,84; méthode carène à carène : 0,95). Les deux mesures étaient très rapprochées (CCI = 0,93; P < 0,001). La BLSD présentait une angulation très variable [(ÉT) moyen, 0.1 (9,5)°; éventail, -28,6 à 21,2]. CONCLUSION: Ces observations anatomiques nous permettent de mieux comprendre l'anatomie variable de l'arbre bronchique droit et pourrait aider les anesthésiologistes thoraciques à choisir le dispositif le mieux adapté pour isoler le poumon de leur patient.