The appropriateness of colonoscopies at a teaching hospital: magnitude, associated factors, and comparison of EPAGE and EPAGE-II criteria.

BACKGROUND: The growing demand for colonoscopies and inappropriate colonoscopies have become a significant problem for health care. OBJECTIVES: To assess the appropriateness of colonoscopies and to analyze the association with some clinical and organizational factors. To compare the results of the European Panel of Appropriateness of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (EPAGE) and the EPAGE-II criteria. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: Endoscopy unit of a teaching hospital in Spain. PATIENTS: Patients referred for colonoscopy, excluding urgent, therapeutic indications, and poor cleansing. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Appropriateness of colonoscopies according to the EPAGE criteria. RESULTS: From 749 colonoscopies, 619 were included. Most patients were referred by gastroenterologists (66.1%) in an outpatient setting (80.6%). Hematochezia was the most frequent indication (31.5%) followed by colorectal cancer-related indications (27.3%); a clinically relevant diagnosis was established in 41%. Inappropriate use was higher with EPAGE (27.0%) than EPAGE-II (17.4%) criteria. Surveillance after colonic polypectomy and uncomplicated lower abdominal pain were the indications exhibiting higher inadequacy. Inappropriate use was less with older age, in hospitalized patients, with referrals from internal medicine, and in colonoscopies with clinically relevant diagnoses. Agreement between EPAGE and EPAGE-II was fair (weighted κ = 0.31) but improved to moderate (simple κ = 0.60) after grouping appropriate and uncertain levels. LIMITATIONS: The appropriateness criteria are based on panel opinions. Some patients (12%) could not be evaluated with the EPAGE criteria. CONCLUSIONS: Our study identifies substantial colonoscopy overuse, especially in tumor disease surveillance. The EPAGE-II criteria decrease the inappropriate rate and the possibility of overlooking potentially severe lesions.

Prevalence of nonpolypoid colorectal neoplasms in symptomatic patients scheduled for colonoscopy: a study with total colonic chromoscopy.

OBJECTIVES: (i) To determine the prevalence of nonpolypoid colorectal neoplasms (NP-CRNs) in a prospective cohort of patients of a Mediterranean area; (ii) to compare the characteristics of NP-CRNs with those of polypoid adenomas, focusing on the rate of high-grade dysplasia (HGD) and carcinoma; (iii) to evaluate the characteristics of patients harboring NP-CRNs versus patients with protruding adenomas (P-CRNs). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A prospective, cross-sectional observational study was made in which consecutive unselected patients were scheduled for colonoscopy and pancolonic chromoendoscopy. The Paris Classification of Superficial Neoplastic Lesions was used to classify the detected lesions, and the revised Vienna criteria were applied to describe the grade of dysplasia. All examinations were performed by the same endoscopist, and all samples were reviewed by the same pathologist. RESULTS: A total of 290 patients were included, and 613 neoplasms were detected-26% of them being NP-CRNs. The prevalence of NP-CRNs was 34.1% [95% confidence interval (CI): 28.8%-39.7%]. The proportion of HGD or carcinoma in NP-CRNs was 2.5% (95% CI: 0.8%-5.9%), versus 2.9% in P-CRNs (95% CI: 1.6%-4.7%). Size larger than 10 mm [odds ratio: 22.7 (95% CI: 5.2-99.2)] and a pedunculated morphology [odds ratio: 5.7 (95% CI: 1.3-24.3)] were related to the presence of HGD or carcinoma. A relationship between increased size and HGD or carcinoma was found for all morphologies. Patients harboring only NP-CRNs and patients harboring only P-CRNs were similar for all the variables collected. CONCLUSIONS: NP-CRNs have a high prevalence in our region, but show a proportion of HGD and carcinoma similar to that seen in P-CRNs. No patient variable is predictive of the presence of a NP-CRN.

Double-guidewire technique for difficult bile duct cannulation: a multicenter randomized, controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: ERCP can be associated with serious complications. Difficulty in common bile duct (CBD) cannulation is one of the main risk factors for post-ERCP pancreatitis. The double-guidewire technique (DGT) has been considered a promising alternative approach in difficult cannulation situations. OBJECTIVE: To compare the performance of DGT with the standard cannulation technique (SCT) in patients in whom CBD cannulation is difficult to perform. DESIGN: Multicenter randomized, controlled trial. SETTING: Six tertiary referral centers. PATIENTS: A total of 188 patients with difficult CBD cannulation defined by completion of 5 unsuccessful cannulation attempts were enrolled. INTERVENTIONS: Ninety-seven patients were assigned to the DGT group and 91 to the SCT group. Both techniques were compared for an extra 10 cannulation attempts. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: CBD cannulation rate, number of attempts required to cannulate, and ERCP-related complications. RESULTS: Successful CBD cannulation was achieved in 46 of 97 (47%) patients in the DGT group compared with 51 of 91 (56%) in the SCT group (OR 0.85; 95% CI, 0.64-1.12). The median number of attempts required for each group was 9 and 7, respectively (P = .128). The incidence of post-ERCP pancreatitis was 17% in the DGT group and 8% in the SCT group (OR 2.13; 95% CI, 0.89-5.05). LIMITATIONS: Reduced number of enrolled subjects and a lack of detailed information regarding the number and extent of pancreatic duct contrast injections. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with difficult CBD cannulation, DGT was not superior to SCT in achieving CBD cannulation. DGT might be associated with a higher risk of post-ERCP pancreatitis.

Evaluation of postsurgical recurrence in Crohn's disease: a new indication for capsule endoscopy?

BACKGROUND: Recurrence after surgery to treat Crohn's disease is frequent and unpredictable. The efficacy of postsurgery capsule endoscopy in detecting recurrence in patients with Crohn's disease is yet to be confirmed. OBJECTIVE: To assess the safety, accuracy, and therapeutic impact of capsule endoscopy in these patients. DESIGN: Crohn's disease recurrence at the neoileum (Rutgeers score) was assessed in the patients by colonoscopy and capsule endoscopy. The M2A Patency Capsule (Given Imaging, Yoqneam, Israel) was administered 1 week before capsule endoscopy. Capsule endoscopy was performed within 2 weeks of colonoscopy. Investigators were blinded to the results of each technique. Patient comfort during the procedures was recorded. PATIENTS: Twenty-four patients with Crohn's disease with ileocolonic anastomosis were prospectively included. All patients were asymptomatic and did not receive any prophylactic treatment. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Neoileum recurrence. RESULTS: A colonoscopy was performed in all patients, although the neoileum could not be reached in 3 of them. M2A Patency Capsule excretion was delayed in 2 patients; thus capsule endoscopy was given only to 22 patients. Recurrence was visualized with colonoscopy in 6 patients and with capsule endoscopy in 5. Ten additional recurrences were visualized only with capsule endoscopy. Moreover, proximal involvement was detected in 13 patients. Therapeutic management was modified in 16 patients. All patients preferred capsule endoscopy. CONCLUSIONS: Capsule endoscopy is more effective in the evaluation of recurrence after surgery for Crohn's disease and is better tolerated than colonoscopy. This is of significant therapeutic relevance.

Quantitative cholescintigraphy and bile abnormalities in patients with acalculous biliary pain.

Acalculous biliary pain has been related to gallbladder dysfunction that produces a gallbladder emptying defect-a condition which favours the development of lithiasis. It is therefore probable that microlithiasis is present in patients with gallbladder dysfunction. The aims of this study were to measure gallbladder emptying and investigate bile abnormalities in patients with acalculous biliary pain. In 92 consecutive patients, gallbladder emptying was assessed by quantitative cholescintigraphy (abnormal ejection fraction < or =40%). In 64 patients, a microscopic study was performed on duodenal bile, defining abnormality as the presence of cholesterol crystals in any amount and/or calcium bilirubinate granules and/or microspheroliths at a rate of >10 per slide. The ejection fraction was abnormal in 45 patients (49%) (median 25.1%, range 6.8-39.3%) and normal in the remaining 47 cases (median 71.3%, range 41.0-96.1%). Bile was abnormal in 32 of 64 patients (50%), the most frequent finding being calcium bilirubinate granules. In the patients with bile abnormalities, abnormal ejection fraction was more frequent (20 of 32) and the median ejection fraction was lower (30.9%, range 12.0-94.1%) than in the patients with normal bile (16 of 32 with an abnormal ejection fraction; median ejection fraction 50.7%, range 6.8-96.1%). Abnormal bile was frequent (55.5%) in patients with reduced ejection fraction, but was not uncommon in patients with normal ejection fraction (33.3%). Fewer patients showed no alteration (25%). It is concluded that in most patients, acalculous biliary pain coexists with gallbladder dysfunction or abnormal bile, the combination of both alterations being common.