Effectiveness of risankizumab in plaque psoriasis with involvement of difficult-to-treat areas: a real-world experience from two referral centers.

The management of plaque psoriasis that affects difficult-to-treat areas can be challenging. Biologics have become the treatment of choice for moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. However, there are limited data on their efficacy in difficult-to-treat sites (including scalp, palms/soles, nails and genitalia). We conducted a 52-week retrospective study to evaluate the effectiveness of risankizumab in 202 patients with moderate-to-severe involvement of at least one difficult-to-treat area. One hundred and sixty-five patients had scalp psoriasis, 21 had involvement of palms or soles, 72 were affected by genital psoriasis, and 50 patients reported the involvement of the fingernails. After one year of treatment, 97.58% of patients with scalp involvement, 95.28% of patients with palmoplantar psoriasis, 100% of patients with genital psoriasis and 82% of patients with nail involvement achieved a site-specific Physician's Global Assessment of 0 or 1 (clear or almost clear). No serious adverse events were observed during the study. Our study supports the effectiveness of risankizumab in plaque psoriasis involving difficult-to-treat sites.

Real-Life Effectiveness and Safety of Risankizumab in 131 Patients Affected by Moderate-to-Severe Plaque Psoriasis: A 52-Week Retrospective Study.

INTRODUCTION: Risankizumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody that selectively targets interleukin-23. It is approved for treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. We conducted a 52-week monocentric retrospective study to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of risankizumab in a real-life setting. METHODS: Our study included 131 adults with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis all treated with risankizumab for at least 52 weeks. Patient characteristics and PASI (Psoriasis Area and Severity Index) at each visit were recorded. The percentages of patients achieving 75%/90%/100% (PASI 75/90/100) improvement in PASI with respect to baseline were registered. RESULTS: At week 52, 93.9%, 78.6%, and 61.1% of patients achieved PASI 75/90/100, respectively. An absolute PASI ≤ 2 was reached by 90.8% at week 52. The higher body mass index and the presence of cardio-metabolic comorbidities did not interfere with the odds of reaching PASI 75/90/100 at each time-point. At week 52, comparable percentages of patients achieved PASI 100, regardless of the involvement of difficult-to-treat-areas. No significant safety findings were recorded and none of the patients had to interrupt the treatment because of adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings confirmed that risankizumab is a safe and effective therapeutic option for the treatment of a wide "real-life" cohort of patients with psoriasis.

Safety of Biologic Therapies in Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Plaque Psoriasis and Concomitant Viral Hepatitis: A Monocentric Retrospective Study.

INTRODUCTION: There are no strong data regarding the treatment with biologics (especially for the most recent anti-IL-17 and anti-IL-23 drugs) of patients with psoriasis and concomitant viral hepatitis. We assessed the safety of biologic drugs in patients with psoriasis who are seropositive for hepatitis B or C and did not receive antiviral prophylaxis. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective single-center study. The efficacy of biologic treatments was evaluated by assessing the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) score during all visits, for a minimum follow-up of 52 weeks. All patients were evaluated by a hepatologist before starting the treatment. They were monitored for reactivation of viral hepatitis. RESULTS: Twenty patients had positive markers of hepatitis B virus (HBV) or hepatitis C virus (HCV). Seventeen patients had positive markers of HBV infection, and four patients had antibodies for HCV (one patient had serologic evidence of both infections). Anti-IL-23 biologics were the most used in our population, with risankizumab being the most prescribed drug. No patient had evidence of viral reactivation during our study. Study limitations include its retrospective nature and our inclusion of patients with different serological status receiving different biologic drugs. CONCLUSION: Biologic therapies (including anti-IL-23 drugs) appear to be safe in patients seropositive for HCV or HBV core antibody who did not receive antiviral prophylaxis.