Pilot testing a patient decision aid as a strategy to reduce overtreatment for older women with early-stage breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Despite national guidelines recommending omission of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) and post-lumpectomy radiotherapy (RT) in older women with early-stage, hormone receptor-positive (HR+) breast cancer, these practices persist. This pilot study assesses whether a decision aid can target patient-level determinants of low-value treatments. METHODS: We adapted and pilot-tested a decision aid in women ≥70 years old with early-stage HR â€‹+ â€‹breast cancer. Primary outcomes included acceptability and appropriateness of the decision aid. Secondary outcomes included treatment choice and satisfaction with decision. RESULTS: Twenty-three patients enrolled in the trial. 19 completed survey one; 16 completed survey two. Primary outcomes demonstrated that 84% of patients agreed or strongly agreed the aid was acceptable and appropriate. Secondary outcomes demonstrated that 19% of patients underwent SLNB (below pre-intervention baseline), and 85% received adjuvant RT (change not statistically significant). CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrate that a decision aid may effectively target patient-level factors contributing to overuse of low-value therapies.

Understanding Treatment Decision-Making in Older Women With Breast Cancer: A Survey-Based Study.

INTRODUCTION: For women ≥70 y old with early-stage hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative breast cancer, the national guidelines recommend the omission of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) and post-lumpectomy radiotherapy. However, national-level data suggest these treatments remain common. We utilized a survey-based approach to explore patient-level factors driving overutilization. METHODS: We recruited women ≥70 y old with early-stage hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative breast cancer within 6 mo of surgery. An exploratory cross-sectional survey captured information on offered and pursued treatments, the importance of patient-centered outcomes, and the influence of each outcome on treatment decision-making. Descriptive statistics were used for analysis. RESULTS: 31/51 patients completed the survey with a response rate of 61%. Most patients (86%) received a lumpectomy. Twenty-eight percent of patients received SLNB, and 56% of lumpectomy patients underwent adjuvant radiotherapy. When considering treatment options, the patient-centered outcomes, most important for decision-making, were overall survival, breast-specific survival, and preventing local recurrence, while breast appearance, financial costs, and avoiding the need for pills (endocrine therapy) were the least important. CONCLUSIONS: Patients' treatment decisions align with their values. The correlation between patient-stated values and treatment decisions suggests a perceived mortality benefit of low-value SLNB and radiotherapy. These findings can inform targeted efforts to deimplement low-value care in breast cancer through patient-focused tools and education.

Targets for De-implementation of Unnecessary Testing Before Low-Risk Surgery: A Qualitative Study.

INTRODUCTION: Despite multispecialty recommendations to avoid routine preoperative testing before low-risk surgery, the practice remains common and de-implementation has proven difficult. The goal of this study as to elicit determinants of unnecessary testing before low-risk surgery to inform de-implementation efforts. METHODS: We conducted focused ethnography at a large academic institution, including semi-structured interviews and direct observations at two preoperative evaluation clinics and one outpatient surgery center. Themes were identified through narrative thematic analysis and mapped to a comprehensive and integrated checklist of determinants of practice, the Tailored Implementation for Chronic Diseases framework (TICD). RESULTS: Thirty individuals participated (surgeons, anesthesiologists, primary care physicians, physician assistants, nurses, and medical assistants). Three themes were identified: (1) Shared Values (TICD Social, Political, and Legal Factors), (2) Gaps in Knowledge (TICD Individual Health Professional Factors, Guideline Factors), and (3) Communication Breakdown (TICD Professional Interactions, Incentives and Resources, Capacity for Organizational Change). Shared Values describe core tenets expressed by all groups of clinicians, namely prioritizing patient safety and utilizing evidence-based medicine. Clinicians had Gaps in Knowledge related to existing data and preoperative testing recommendations. Communication Breakdowns within interdisciplinary teams resulted in unnecessary testing ordered to meet perceived expectations of other providers. CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians have knowledge gaps related to preoperative testing recommendations and may be amenable to de-implementation efforts and educational interventions. Consensus guidelines may streamline interdisciplinary communication by clarifying interdisciplinary needs and reducing testing ordered to meet perceived expectations of other clinicians.

Implementation of melanoma guidelines in the multidisciplinary setting: A qualitative analysis.

BACKGROUND: Data suggest variation in utilization of completion lymph node dissection (CLND) and adjuvant systemic therapy (AT) for sentinel lymph node-positive melanoma. We aimed to explore how clinicians consider multidisciplinary treatment options. METHODS: We conducted semi-structured interviews of surgical oncologists, medical oncologists, and otolaryngologists to produce a thematic analysis. RESULTS: Participants (n = 26) described melanoma care as inherently "multidisciplinary," noting the importance of conversations facilitated by shared clinic days or space. Despite believing that their practice mirrored other clinicians, participants revealed diverging perspectives on CLND and AT. Multidisciplinary care presented challenges for surveillance as surgeons expressed desire to retain ownership of patients but did not feel comfortable overseeing AT needs. Participants questioned the fidelity of nodal ultrasounds, noted redundancy in their roles, and described a "surveillance burden" for patients. CONCLUSION: Opportunities exist to improve multidisciplinary melanoma care through broader consensus of how to translate emerging data into patient care and delineating surveillance roles.

Bone metastasis from glioblastoma: a systematic review.

INTRODUCTION: Glioblastoma (GBM) is a devastating disease with poor overall survival. Despite the common occurrence of GBM among primary brain tumors, metastatic disease is rare. Our goal was to perform a systematic literature review on GBM with osseous metastases and understand the rate of metastasis to the vertebral column as compared to the remainder of the skeleton, and how this histology would fit into our current paradigm of treatment for bone metastases. METHODS: A Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA)-compliant literature search was performed using the PubMed database from 1952 to 2021. Search terms included "GBM", "glioblastoma", "high-grade glioma", "bone metastasis", and "bone metastases". RESULTS: Of 659 studies initially identified, 67 articles were included in the current review. From these 67 articles, a total of 92 distinct patient case presentations of metastatic glioblastoma to bone were identified. Of these cases, 58 (63%) involved the vertebral column while the remainder involved lesions within the skull, sternum, rib cage, and appendicular skeleton. CONCLUSION: Metastatic dissemination of GBM to bone occurs. While the true incidence is unknown, workup for metastatic disease, especially involving the spinal column, is warranted in symptomatic patients. Lastly, management of patients with GBM vertebral column metastases can follow the International Spine Oncology Consortium two-step multidisciplinary algorithm for the management of spinal metastases.