Primary Breast Augmentation with Autologous Fat Grafting Alone: Evaluation of Patient Satisfaction Using the BREAST-Q.

BACKGROUND: Autologous fat grafting (AFG) for primary aesthetic breast augmentation has grown in popularity over recent years but patient satisfaction has never been objectively evaluated. OBJECTIVES: The aim of the present study was to use the standardized BREAST-Q questionnaire to evaluate satisfaction in patients who had received primary aesthetic breast augmentation with AFG alone. METHODS: All recipients of primary aesthetic breast augmentation by AFG performed between 2013 and 2017 in our plastic surgery department were included. The primary endpoint was assessment of patient satisfaction with the standardized breast augmentation BREAST-Q questionnaire. Three additional questionnaires were used to evaluate patient and surgeon satisfaction. RESULTS: In total, 42 patients (84 breasts) underwent breast augmentation by AFG. Mean patient age was 34 years (range, 23-53 years). The mean volume of reinjected fat was 312.2 mL per breast (range, 130-480 mL). We observed significant improvement in all BREAST-Q postoperative items (excluding physical well-being) with a mean increase of 39 points (95% confidence interval: 28.97, 49.03; P < 0.001) regarding patient satisfaction with breasts. Overall, 82% of patients were satisfied with the result of their liposuction. Minor complications were encountered in 6 of our patients (14%). CONCLUSIONS: Breast augmentation by AFG enhances patient satisfaction as measured by the BREAST-Q. This procedure has a high satisfaction rate and improves quality of life. Breast augmentation by AFG is a valid surgical option for moderate breast augmentation but is not an alternative to implants in large breast augmentation.Level of Evidence: 4.

Surgical care burden in orbito-temporal neurofibromatosis: Multiple procedures and surgical care duration analysis in 47 consecutive adult patients.

Patients with orbito-temporal neurofibromatosis (OTNF) bear a heavy burden of surgical care. We studied 47 consecutive patients with OTNF from the French Neurofibromatosis 1 Referral Center cohort (n > 900), over a 15-year period to determine the clinical features most likely to predict repeat surgery and longer duration of surgical care. Forty-seven patients (5.2% of the NF1 patients' cohort) underwent 79 procedures with a 4.8 years average follow-up. Soft-tissue surgery had a high revision rate (19/45 patients), skeletal surgery did not (2/13 patients). Transosseous wire canthopexy and facial aesthetic unit remodeling were associated with stable outcome. Ptosis repair carried an unfavorable outcome, particularly in the presence of sphenoid dysplasia. Stable skeletal remodeling was achieved with polyethylene implants and/or cementoplasty. Multiple procedures were undertaken in 70% of patients and were predicted by the NF volume, canthopexy, skeletal dysplasia, or a Jackson's classification 2 and/or 3; but not by declining visual acuity. A classification based upon predictive risk of repeated procedures is proposed: Group 1: Isolated soft tissue infiltration not requiring levator palpebrae or canthal surgery; Group 2: Soft tissue involvement requiring ptosis repair or canthopexy, or NF great axis over 4.5 cm; Group 3: Presence of sphenoid dysplasia with pulsatile proptosis, regardless of visual acuity.