RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Joint space assessment for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) by ordinal conventional radiographic scales is susceptible to floor and ceiling effects. High-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HR-pQCT) provides superior resolution, and may detect earlier changes. The goal of this work was to compare existing 3D methods to calculate joint space width (JSW) metrics in human metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joints with HR-pQCT and reach consensus for future studies. Using the consensus method, we established reproducibility with repositioning as well as feasibility for use in second-generation HR-pQCT scanners. METHODS: Three published JSW methods were compared using datasets from individuals with RA from three research centers. A SPECTRA consensus method was developed to take advantage of strengths of the individual methods. Using the SPECTRA method, reproducibility after repositioning was tested and agreement between scanner generations was also established. RESULTS: When comparing existing JSW methods, excellent agreement was shown for JSW minimum and mean (ICC 0.987-0.996) but not maximum and volume (ICC 0.000-0.897). Differences were identified as variations in volume definitions and algorithmic differences that generated high sensitivity to boundary conditions. The SPECTRA consensus method reduced this sensitivity, demonstrating good scan-rescan reliability (ICC >0.911) except for minimum JSW (ICC 0.656). There was strong agreement between results from first- and second-generation HR-pQCT (ICC >0.833). CONCLUSIONS: The SPECTRA consensus method combines unique strengths of three independently-developed algorithms and leverages underlying software updates to provide a mature analysis to measure 3D JSW. This method is robust with respect to repositioning and scanner generations, suggesting its suitability for detecting change.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Historically it has been suggested that noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL) affects approximately 50% of the orthopedic surgery personnel. This noise may be partially caused by the use of powered saw systems that are used to make the bone cuts. The first goal was to quantify and compare the noise emission of these different saw systems during total knee arthroplasty (TKA) surgery. A second goal was to estimate the occupational NIHL risk for the orthopedic surgery personnel in TKA surgery by quantifying the total daily noise emission spectrum during TKA surgery and to compare this to the Dutch Occupational Health Organization guidelines. METHODS: A conventional sagittal oscillating blade system with a full oscillating blade and 2 newer oscillating tip saw systems (handpiece and blade) were compared. Noise level measurements during TKA surgery were performed during cutting and hammering, additionally surgery noise profiles were made. RESULTS: The noise level was significantly lower for the oscillating tip saw systems compared to the conventional saw system, but all were in a range that can cause NIHL. The conventional system handpiece produced a considerable higher noise level compared to oscillating tip handpiece. CONCLUSION: NIHL is an underestimated problem in the orthopedic surgery. Solutions for decreasing the risk of hearing loss should be considered. The use of oscillating tip saw systems have a reduced noise emission in comparison with the conventional saw system. The use of these newer systems might be a first step in decreasing hearing loss among the orthopedic surgery personnel.
