Development and Validation of the Voice Catastrophization Index.

INTRODUCTION: Catastrophization is a cognitive distortion that has been studied in pain patients and found to be a significant factor in their disability and response to treatment. Dysphonia patients may demonstrate a similar behavior, suggesting the existence of voice catastrophization. OBJECTIVE: To establish the validity of the Voice Catastrophization Index (VCI), a new instrument estimating voice symptoms catastrophization. METHODS: A prospective study. Patients with and without voice conditions were administered with the VCI, Voice-Related Quality of Life (V-RQOL), and the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7)questionnaires. Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-V) rating was determined for patients with voice conditions. RESULTS: Ninety-one patients participated, 65 with voice conditions and 26 without. 61.5% were females; mean age was 49.8 ± 15.7 years. The VCI score for patients with voice conditions was significantly higher, 22.46 ± 16.56, compared with 3.96 ± 10.79, respectively (P value < 0.0001). The VCI demonstrated moderate correlation with both V-RQOL and GAD-7 scores: -0.562 and 0.560, respectively (P value < 0.000001); however, it showed no correlation with the CAPE-V. The VCI's internal consistency with each of its three dimensions and 13 items was acceptable to strong. The reproducibility and stability was demonstrated in a subgroup of 26 patients; 81% of these patients had a difference of 10 or less points between the two evaluations. CONCLUSIONS: The VCI accomplished the requirements of a scale's validity for estimation of voice symptoms catastrophization in voice patients. The potential role of voice catastrophization as a predictor of treatment response and tailoring can now be investigated using the VCI.

Aerodynamic Patterns in Patients With Voice Disorders: A Retrospective Study.

OBJECTIVE: A recently published retrospective chart review of aerodynamic profiles of women with primary muscle tension dysphonia by Gillespie et al (2013) identified various relationships between mean airflow rate (MFR) and estimated subglottal pressure (est-Psub). The current retrospective study expanded the diagnostic categories to include all voice disorders referred for voice therapy. Three research questions were proposed: (1) Are there differences in the MFR and the est-Psub compared with the normal control group? (2) Within the disordered population, are there different variations in the pairing of MFR and est-Psub? (3) If these variations exist, are they diagnosis specific? METHODS: A retrospective chart review of patients seen for acoustic and aerodynamic voice assessment at the Emory Voice Center between January 1, 2013 and December 31, 2014, were examined for aerodynamic measures of est-Psub and MFR; of these, 192 met the inclusion criteria. Simple t test, two-step cluster analysis, and analysis of variance, as well as Tukey multiple comparisons, were performed using R and SPSS. RESULTS: Mean est-Psub was significantly greater in the group with voice disorder than in the control group (P value < 0.001). However, no statistical significance was found when comparing the MFR with the control group (P value <0.59). Nine possible pairings of MFR and est-Psub were found. Sufficient evidence was not found to detect significant differences in these pairings across diagnostic groups. CONCLUSION: With regard to the rate and interrelationships of MFR and est-Psub, the findings of this study are similar to those of Gillespie et al, that is, MFR and est-Psub are not determinate of diagnosis.

Validation of a telephone screening tool for spasmodic dysphonia and vocal fold tremor.

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: The objective of this study was to ascertain whether clinicians can reliably distinguish between spasmodic dysphonia (SD)/vocal tremor and other voice disorders by telephone, despite this modality's limited frequency response. STUDY DESIGN: Randomized, single-blinded, and prospective study. METHODS: Voice-disordered patients with (n = 22) and without (n = 17) SD and/or vocal tremor recorded standardized utterances via landline telephone. A laryngologist and two speech-language pathologists blinded to the diagnoses rated each recording as "yes" or "no" to "SD or tremor present?," and if "yes" categorized into adductor, abductor, tremor only, or adductor with tremor subtypes. Twenty-one recordings were presented twice at random so intrarater reliability could be assessed. All ratings were compared with gold standard diagnosis by a second laryngologist who performed a full examination, including videostroboscopy, on each patient. RESULTS: For the comparison "SD or tremor" yes versus no, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value are 90%, 95%, 96%, and 89%, respectively. Interrater reliability (Cohen kappa) compared with the gold standard ranged from 0.70 to 0.93 (substantial to almost perfect agreement). Cronbach alpha among three raters was 0.90 for this comparison. Intrarater reliability (number matched/number inspected) was very high, ranging from 0.97 to 1.0. Comparing gold standard and telephone rating of SD/tremor subtypes, kappa ranged from 0.48 to 0.60 (moderate agreement). Cronbach alpha among three raters was 0.88 for this comparison. Intrarater reliability ranged from 0.84 to 0.97. CONCLUSIONS: SD and tremor can be reliably distinguished from other voice disorders over the telephone.