The valvular apparatus in venous insufficiency: a problem of quantity?

Abnormal venous valvular function may produce venous reflux and venous insufficiency. While valvular agenesis is a known, but rare cause of venous insufficiency. While valvular agenesis is a known, but rare cause of venous insufficiency, little work has been done on the relative number of greater saphenous vein (GSV) valves in patients with venous insufficiency. This study investigates whether the GSV in patients with symptomatic venous insufficiency has fewer valves than the GSV of patients without venous insufficiency. The number of GSV valves in patients (n = 51) with symptomatic venous insufficiency undergoing saphenectomy (VI) were compared with the number of GSV valves in patients (n = 26) without venous insufficiency undergoing in situ GSV bypass under angioscopic surveillance who served as a control group. The two groups differed, as expected, in age and sex distribution. The VI group had a mean of 25.7 +/- 11.0 centimeters of GSV between valves, while the control group had 19.0 +/- 9.7 centimeters of GSV between valves (F = 6.99; p = 0.01). The mean number of valves in the saphenous veins of the two groups also differed significantly: VI = 2.3 +/- 0.83 versus control (CTRL) = 4.8 +/- 2.01 (F = 61.86; p < 0.0001). That properly functioning valve leaflets help maintain physiologic antegrade venous flow is indisputable. This study, however, suggests that the relative lack of valves may be related to the development of venous insufficiency. This report documents that patients with symptomatic reflux in the GSV have significantly fewer valves than patients with apparently normal functioning saphenous veins.

Correction of lower extremity deep venous incompetence by ablation of superficial venous reflux.

Chronic venous insufficiency which produces lipodermatosclerosis, varicosities, or ulceration, is frequently caused by superficial venous reflux and deep venous incompetence. The anatomy of venous insufficiency has been clarified with duplex ultrasound, thus allowing appropriately directed therapy. However, postoperative venous physiology in patients undergoing superficial venous ablation has been infrequently reported. This study was undertaken to document the effect of superficial venous ablation on deep venous reflux. Between April 1994 and May 1995, 45 patients were examined preoperatively with duplex ultrasound. All patients had symptomatic venous insufficiency and were found to have greater saphenous vein reflux. Clinical classification of venous insufficiency (according to the criteria of the joint councils of the vascular societies) included class I in 30 patients, class II in 12, and class III in 3. Seventeen patients (38%) had reflux in the femoral venous system in addition to superficial reflux. All patients underwent removal of the proximal greater saphenous vein in concert with multiple stab avulsions of identified varicosities. Postoperative interrogation of the venous system revealed that in 16 (94%) of 17 patients, coexistent femoral venous insufficiency completely resolved. Thus ablation of superficial venous reflux eliminated incompetence in the deep venous system in patients with combined disease. These preliminary results suggest that superficial venous incompetence may be a cause of deep venous insufficiency. Whereas alternative methods to correct deep venous insufficiency have met with limited success, it appears that saphenectomy (when combined disease is present) may be effective in correction of deep venous reflux.