Inguinal lymph node dissection in the era of minimally invasive surgical technology.

BACKGROUND: Inguinal lymph node dissection (ILND) is an essential step in both treatment and staging of several malignancies including penile and vulvar cancers. Various open, video endoscopic, and robotic-assisted techniques have been utilized so far. In this review, we aim to describe available minimally invasive surgical approaches for ILND, and review their outcomes and complications. METHODS: The PubMed, Wiley Online Library, and Science Direct databases were reviewed in February 2020 to find relevant studies published in English within 2000-2020. FINDINGS: There are different minimally invasive platforms available to accomplish dissection of inguinal nodes without jeopardizing oncological results while minimizing postoperative complications. Video Endoscopic Inguinal Lymphadenectomy and Robotic Video Endoscopic Inguinal Lymphadenectomy are safe and achieve the same nodal yield, a surrogate metric for oncological adequacy. When compared to open technique, Video Endoscopic Inguinal Lymphadenectomy and Robotic Video Endoscopic Inguinal Lymphadenectomy may offer faster postoperative recovery and fewer postoperative complications including wound dehiscence, necrosis, and infection. The relatively high rate and severity of postoperative complications hinders utilization of recommended ILND for oncologic indications. Minimally invasive approaches, using laparoscopic or robotic-assisted platforms, show some promise in reducing the morbidity of this procedure while achieving adequate short and intermediate term oncological outcomes.

Quantification of body composition in renal cell carcinoma patients: Comparing computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging measurements.

PURPOSE: Body composition measures provide valuable information for prognostication and treatment election in cancer patients. We investigated the novel use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for skeletal muscle and adipose tissue cross-sectional area measurements in preoperative renal cell carcinoma (RCC) patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: RCC patients with pre-operative CT and MRI abdominal imaging were identified. Semi-automatic segmentation measurement of skeletal muscle area (SMA), intramuscular fat area (IMFA), visceral fat area (VFA), subcutaneous fat area (SFA), linear measurements of psoas, paraspinal muscles were performed. Pearson correlation coefficients, Bland-Altman plot analyses were done. Multivariable regression analysis examined the relationship between patient characteristics and skeletal muscle. RESULTS: Image analysis was performed on 58 RCC patients with preoperative CT and MRI imaging. For segmentation measures, r = 0.99, 0.99, 0.99, and 0.98 for SMA, IMFA, VFA, SFA, respectively, and 0.96 for linear measures of skeletal muscle. Bland-Altman analysis revealed a bias toward larger CT value for SMA (1.35 %), linear muscle measures (2.79 %), and SFA (10.34 %), and toward larger MRI values for IMFA (0.75 %) and VFA (5.81 %). ECOG ≥ 1 was associated with lower skeletal muscle than ECOG 0 for all measurements. CONCLUSIONS: Strong correlation of CT and MRI cross sectional measurements of skeletal muscle and adipose tissues supports the use of axial MRI images for comprehensive measurement of body composition. This has widespread implications for body composition research and cancer patient care.

Utility of Minimally Invasive Technology for Inguinal Lymph Node Dissection in Penile Cancer.

Our aim is to review the benefits as well as techniques, surgical outcomes, and complications of minimally invasive inguinal lymph node dissection (ILND) for penile cancer. The PubMed, Wiley Online Library, and Science Direct databases were reviewed in March 2020 for relevant studies limited to those published in English and within 2000-2020. Thirty-one articles describing minimally invasive ILND were identified for review. ILND has an important role in both staging and treatment of penile cancer. Minimally invasive technologies have been utilized to perform ILND in penile cancer patients with non-palpable inguinal lymph nodes and intermediate to high-risk primary tumors or patients with unilateral palpable non-fixed inguinal lymph nodes measuring less than 4 cm, including videoscopic endoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy (VEIL) and robotic videoscopic endoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy (RVEIL). Current data suggest that VEIL and RVEIL are feasible and safe with minimal intra-operative complications. Perhaps the strongest appeal for the use of minimally-invasive approaches is their faster post-operative recovery and less post-operative complications. As a result, patients can tolerate this procedure better and surgeons can offer surgery to patients who otherwise would not be a candidate or personally willing to undergo surgery. When compared to open technique, VEIL and RVEIL have similar dissected nodal count, a surrogate metric for oncological adequacy, and a none-inferior inguinal recurrence rate. Larger randomized studies are encouraged to investigate long-term outcome and survival rates using these minimally-invasive techniques for ILND.