Effectiveness, safety, and local progression after percutaneous laser ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma nodules up to 4 cm are not affected by tumor location.

OBJECTIVE: A high-risk location--defined as the tumor margin being less than 5 mm from large vessels or vital structures--represents a well-known limitation and contraindication for radiofrequency ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) nodules. The aim of this study was to verify whether HCC nodule location negatively affected the outcome of percutaneous laser ablation in terms of its primary effectiveness, safety, and ability to prevent local tumor progression. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The medical records and radiologic examinations of 164 cirrhotic patients (90 men, 74 women; mean age ± SD, 68.6 ± 8.3 years) with 182 HCC nodules 4 cm or smaller (mean diameter ± SD, 2.7 ± 0.78 cm) that had been treated by laser ablation between 1996 and 2008 were retrospectively analyzed. One hundred six patients had 116 nodules in high-risk sites (high-risk group), whereas 58 patients had 66 tumors located elsewhere (standard-risk group). RESULTS: The overall median follow-up was 81 months (range, 6-144 months). The initial complete ablation rate per nodule did not significantly differ between the high-risk group and the standard-risk group (92.2% vs 95.5%, respectively; p = 0.2711). Rates of major complications (high-risk group vs standard-risk group, 1.9% [including one death] vs 0%) and minor complications (5.6% vs 1.0%) were not statistically different between the two groups. Only side effects were recorded significantly more often in high-risk patients than in standard-risk patients (31.5% vs 19.8%; p = 0.049). There was no significant difference in either cumulative incidence of local tumor progression (p = 0.499) or local tumor progression-free survival (p = 0.499, log rank test) between the high-risk group and the standard-risk group. CONCLUSION: When laser ablation is used to treat small HCC nodules, tumor location does not have a significant negative impact on the technique's primary effectiveness or safety or on its ability to achieve local control of disease.

A randomized study on Peg-interferon alfa-2a with or without ribavirin in liver transplant recipients with recurrent hepatitis C.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: We performed a randomized trial on pegylated interferon alfa-2a (Peg-IFNalpha) monotherapy vs Peg-IFNalpha and ribavirin in non-cirrhotic liver transplant recipients with recurrent hepatitis C. METHODS: Forty-two patients transplanted for HCV-related cirrhosis 12-96 months earlier were randomized to Peg-IFNalpha monotherapy (180 microg weekly) or Peg-IFNalpha and ribavirin, up to the maximum tolerated dose, for 48 weeks. RESULTS: Early virological response (EVR, i.e., HCV-RNA2 log drop at week 12) occurred in 76% of the monotherapy and 71% of the combination groups, respectively (intention-to treat). Sustained virological response (SVR) occurred in 8 (38%) and 7 (33%) patients, respectively. EVR had a positive predictive value for SVR of 50% and 47%, respectively, and a 100% negative predictive value in both groups. Six drop-outs occurred in the monotherapy (including 3 rejections) and 7 in the combination groups (including one rejection). Peg-INFalpha dose was reduced in 7 and 8 patients, respectively. The average daily dose of ribavirin was 435 mg/day. CONCLUSIONS: Peg-IFNalpha-2a, with or without ribavirin, induces SVR in one-third of transplant recipients with recurrent hepatitis C. Treatment cessation is indicated in patients without EVR. The low SVR rate is mainly due to inability to sustain full doses of antivirals and lack of the booster effect of ribavirin.

Analysis of factors predicting survival in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma treated with percutaneous laser ablation.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The factors which predict the long-term outcome in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma who are treated with percutaneous laser ablation (PLA) are not well established. METHODS: We prospectively analyzed treatment and survival parameters of 148 cirrhotic patients with nonsurgical hepatocellular carcinoma who had undergone PLA at a single institution during an 11-year period. RESULTS: Single tumors were seen in 129 of 148 (87%) patients, and 2-3 nodules were seen in 19 (13%) patients, for a total of 169 tumors. The median overall time survival was 39 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 30-47 months). The 1-, 2-, 3-, 4-, and 5-year cumulative survival rates were 89, 75, 52, 43, and 27%, respectively. From multiple regression analysis, the independent predictors of survival were found to be tumor grading (P=0.002; risk ratio [RR] 0.37, 95% CI 0.20-0.70), bilirubin levels < or =2.5mg/dl (P=0.014; RR 1.58, 95% CI 1.09-2.28), and the achievement of complete tumor ablation (P=0.020; RR 0.53, 95% CI 0.31-0.90). An initial complete tumor ablation was the only factor associated with longer survival in patients with Child-Turcotte-Pugh class A cirrhosis (P=0.012; hazard ratio [HR] 0.48, 95% CI 0.23-1.03). CONCLUSIONS: A complete tumor ablation results in improved survival in all patients with nonsurgical hepatocellular carcinoma. Ideal candidates for PLA are those with a well-differentiated histology, and normal bilirubin levels.

Failure of a reinforced triple course of hepatitis B vaccination in patients transplanted for HBV-related cirrhosis.

Long-term immunoprophylaxis with anti-HBs immunoglobulins (HBIg) is used to prevent hepatitis B (HBV) reinfection after liver transplantation for HBV-related cirrhosis. This approach is highly expensive. A recent report proposed posttransplant HBV vaccination with a reinforced schedule as an alternative strategy to allow HBIg discontinuation. We investigated the efficacy of a reinforced triple course of HBV vaccination in 17 patients transplanted for HBsAg-positive cirrhosis 2 to 7 years earlier. The first cycle consisted of 3 double intramuscular doses (40 microg) of recombinant vaccine at month 0, 1, and 2, respectively. This was followed, in nonresponders, by a second cycle of 6 intradermal 10 microg doses every 15 days. All nonresponders then received a third cycle identical to the first one. Vaccination started 4.5 months after HBIg discontinuation, and lamivudine (100 mg/day) was given throughout the study. All patients were seronegative for HBsAg and HBV-DNA (by PCR) and positive for anti-HBe, and 7 were positive for anti-HDV. After the first cycle one patient (#5, 53 years old, male) developed an anti-HBs titer of 154 IU/L, another (#12) reached a titer of 20 IU/L and the remainder had titers <10 IU/L. At month 7, patient #5 reached a titer of 687 IU/L. After the second cycle only one additional patient (#9) had a slight response (an anti-HBs titer of 37 IU/L). After the third cycle patient #9 rose to an anti-HBs titer of 280 IU/L, patient #12 dropped to 10 IU/L, and no other patient responded. In conclusion, a highly reinforced HBV vaccination program is effective only in a few patients who had liver transplants for HBV-related cirrhosis.