Opioid prescribing patterns for distal radius fractures in the ambulatory setting: A 10-year retrospective study.

OBJECTIVE: Distal radius fractures (DRFs) are one of the most common orthopedic injuries, with most managed in the nonoperative ambulatory setting. The objectives of this study are to examine National Health Center Statistics (NHCS) data for DRF treated in the nonoperative ambulatory setting to identify opioid and nonopioid analgesic prescribing patterns and to determine demographic risk factors for prescription of these medications. Design, setting, patients, and measures: This study is a retrospective analysis of data collected by the NHCS from 2007 to 2016. Utilizing International Classification of Diseases codes, all visits to emergency departments and doctors' offices for DRFs were identified. Variables of interest included demographic data, expected payment source, and prescription of opioid or nonopioid analgesics. RESULTS: During the study timeframe, 15,572,531 total visits for DRFs were recorded. DRF visits requiring opioid and nonopioid analgesic prescriptions increased over time. Patients aged 45-64 years were significantly more likely to receive an opioid prescription than any other age group (p < 0.05). Opioid prescription was positively correlated with the use of workers' compensation and negatively correlated with patients receiving services under charity care (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Prescriptions of both opioid and nonopioid analgesic medications for DRF have been steadily increasing over time in the nonoperative ambulatory setting, with middle-aged adults most likely to receive an opioid prescription. Opioid prescription rates differ significantly between patients utilizing workers' compensation and patients receiving services under charity care, suggesting that socioeconomic factors play a role in prescribing patterns.

Intermediate Invasive Fungal Sinusitis, a Distinct Entity From Acute Fulminant and Chronic Invasive Fungal Sinusitis.

BACKGROUND: The current classification system of invasive fungal sinusitis (IFS) includes acute (aIFS) and chronic (cIFS) phenotypes. Both phenotypes display histopathologic evidence of tissue necrosis, but differ by presence of angioinvasion, extent of necrosis, and disease progression. aIFS is defined by a rapid onset of symptoms, while cIFS slowly progresses over ≥12 weeks. However, a subset of IFS patients do not fit into the clinical presentation and histopathologic characteristics of either aIFS or cIFS. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the demographic, clinical, and histopathologic characteristics of a distinct subset of IFS. METHODS: Retrospective review of patients with IFS from a single tertiary-care institution (2010-2020). Patients with symptoms for ≤4 weeks were classified as aIFS if they displayed endoscopic evidence of mucosal necrosis or fungal angioinvasion on pathology. Patients with slowly progressive IFS for ≥12 weeks were classified as cIFS. Patients with symptom duration between 4 and 12 weeks with evidence of invasive fungal disease were classified as a new entity and were further investigated. RESULTS: Of the 8 patients identified, 50% were immunosuppressed at presentation. The mean symptom duration prior to presentation was 50.5 days (SD 16.8), and common symptoms included facial pain (100%), vision change (87.5%), and blindness (37.5%). Two patients (25%) died of their disease. Sites of fungal involvement confirmed by histopathology included sphenoid (62.5%) and ethmoid sinuses (12.5%), orbital apex (25%), optic nerve (12.5%), pterygopalatine fossa (12.5%), and clivus (12.5%). Fungal elements but without obvious angioinvasion, were identified in all specimens, and fungus balls (50%), granulomas (37.5%), and giant cells (25%) were also observed on histopathology. CT and MRI radiographic imaging showed findings consistent with orbital, intracranial, or skull base involvement in all patients. CONCLUSION: We propose intermediate IFS as a new subgroup of patients with IFS who do not fit into the standard classification of aIFS or cIFS.

The Smart Use of Smart Technologies in Teaching and Learning: Where we are and Where we Need to be.

OBJECTIVE: The advantages and popularity of technology among learners have vaulted it to the forefront of medical education. The current state of learning and teaching intertwined with technology in medical education and residency is described. Following these characterizations, consideration is given to changes worth exploring in the habits of mind and habits of action that medical students and residents exhibit to deepen their learning and improve their performance. METHODS: Review of literature was conducted to summarize relevant transformations in instructional practices in medical school and residency that can contribute to more effective learning environments. RESULTS: Learners have different approaches that will include differing uses of technology. Technology encourages multitasking, information overload, and the increasing prevalence of invalid information. Implementing bite-sized learning approaches, problem-based or case-based formats, questions, and alternative hypotheses encourages learners to channel technological innovations into their own styles of learning. CONCLUSION: To build knowledge in the technological era of learning, do not take learners' digital readiness for granted. Approach technology as a tool to be wielded when required and not as a crutch.

Risk factors for return visits in children discharged with tracheostomy.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: To determine associations between demographic and clinical characteristics and rate of unplanned returns to system (RTS) in pediatric patients discharged with tracheostomy. METHODS: Medical records were examined for pediatric patients discharged after tracheostomy placement between January 1, 2011 and December 31, 2015. Exclusion criteria included death or decannulation prior to discharge and lack of follow-up through 180 days post-discharge. Readmissions were grouped by time interval after discharge (within 30 days or within 31-180 days). Chi-squared analysis and Fisher's Exact Test were utilized to determine associations between patient characteristics, rate and frequency of RTS, and type of admission (Emergency Department [ED] or inpatient [IP]). RESULTS: One hundred twenty-one patients were eligible for the study, and 80 (66.1 %) had an unanticipated RTS during the follow-up period. Patients with early RTS had a higher total number of RTS. Patients with two or more RTS were more likely to be younger, while patients with five or more RTS were more likely to have greater organ system involvement and cardiovascular (CV) disease in particular. Patients presenting with GI diagnoses were more likely to be discharged from the ED. The rate of RTS remained constant throughout the time period examined. CONCLUSION: Pediatric patients discharged with tracheostomy are medically complex and at high risk of RTS, especially for respiratory and GI problems. This risk does not decrease after the initial post-discharge period and long-term follow-up is warranted. Younger patients and patients with history of early RTS are at highest risk for repeat RTS and should be identified for closer outpatient care.

Echocardiographic findings in children with obstructive sleep apnea: A systematic review.

OBJECTIVE: To systematically review the incidence of cardiac abnormalities in pediatric patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) in order to assess the utility of preoperative echocardiographic evaluation for patients undergoing surgery. STUDY DESIGN: A systematic literature review was performed following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews (PRISMA) guidelines. Data sources were searched from January 1, 1980 to March 25, 2020. Studies that examined echocardiographic findings and polysomnographic data for patients between birth and 18 years of age with polysomnogram-confirmed OSA were included. Studies that included patients with preexisting cardiac, metabolic, or hematologic disorders that could affect hemodynamic parameters were excluded. Included studies were assessed for quality and risk of bias using the U.S. National Institute of Health's Quality Assessment Tools. RESULTS: Thirteen studies met inclusion criteria. Five studies were categorized as high risk of bias, three were categorized as medium risk, and five were categorized as low risk. Study design varied considerably between studies, including heterogeneous classifications of OSA severity, discrepant reporting of echocardiographic parameters, and differing estimations of pulmonary hemodynamics. Significant disagreement regarding the effect of OSA on cardiac function was found between all included studies. CONCLUSION: Data demonstrating significant associations between OSA and cardiac abnormalities in children is inconsistent. Echocardiographic abnormalities are inconsistently found and, when present, their clinical significance remains poorly understood. Assessing the utility of preoperative echocardiography in children with OSA requires further investigation with prospective studies utilizing standardized classifications of OSA severity, reporting of echocardiographic parameters, and estimations of pulmonary hemodynamics.

The utility of preoperative echocardiography in pediatric obstructive sleep apnea.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine the associations between cardiac function and postoperative adverse events in pediatric patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). METHODS: Patients between birth and 18 years of age diagnosed with OSA between January 1, 2015, and December 31, 2018, who underwent echocardiographic evaluation within 6 months of surgery at a tertiary care children's hospital were evaluated. Exclusion criteria included history of neuromuscular disorders, tracheostomy placement, or a predominance of central apneic events recorded during polysomnography (PSG). Patients were grouped by OSA severity. Chi-squared analysis and logistic regression were utilized to determine associations between demographic characteristics, OSA severity, preoperative echocardiographic abnormalities, and postoperative adverse events. RESULTS: One hundred ten children met inclusion criteria for the study, including 22 with mild OSA, 22 with moderate OSA, and 66 with severe OSA. Race and the presence of congenital heart disease (CHD) were significantly associated with differences in OSA severity. Echocardiographic abnormalities were found in 45 patients, but exclusion of patients with CHD revealed no significant associations with differences in OSA severity. Postoperative adverse events were identified in 18 (16%) patients, and only O2 saturation nadir was found to be a significant predictor of these complications. CONCLUSION: Preoperative echocardiogram abnormalities are not commonly found in children with OSA and presence of abnormalities does not predict postoperative adverse events. O2 saturation nadir measured on preoperative PSG is a significant predictor of postoperative adverse events and should be examined as a clinical indicator of OSA severity.

Implementation and evaluation of eight virtual surgical electives for medical students during the COVID-19 pandemic.

BACKGROUND: Eight novel virtual surgery electives (VSEs) were developed and implemented in April-May 2020 for medical students forced to continue their education remotely due to COVID-19. METHODS: Each VSE was 1-2 weeks long, contained specialty-specific course objectives, and included a variety of teaching modalities. Students completed a post-course survey to assess changes in their interest and understanding of the specialty. Quantitative methods were employed to analyze the results. RESULTS: Eighty-three students participated in the electives and 67 (80.7%) completed the post-course survey. Forty-six (68.7%) respondents reported "increased" or "greatly increased" interest in the course specialty completed. Survey respondents' post-course understanding of each specialty increased by a statistically significant amount (p-value = <0.0001). CONCLUSION: This initial effort demonstrated that VSEs can be an effective tool for increasing medical students' interest in and understanding of surgical specialties. They should be studied further with more rigorous methods in a larger population.

Feeding outcomes after paediatric cardiothoracic surgery: a retrospective review.

BACKGROUND: Feeding difficulty is a known complication of congenital heart surgery. Despite this, there is a relative sparsity in the available data regarding risk factors, incidence, associated symptoms, and outcomes. METHODS: In this retrospective chart review, patients aged 0-18 years who underwent congenital heart surgery at a single institution between January and December, 2017 were reviewed. Patients with feeding difficulties before surgery, multiple surgeries, and potentially abnormal recurrent laryngeal nerve anatomy were excluded. Data collected included patient demographics, feeding outcomes, post-operative symptoms, flexible nasolaryngoscopy findings, and rates of readmission within a 1-year follow-up period. Multivariable regression analyses were performed to evaluate the risk of an alternative feeding plan at discharge and length of stay. RESULTS: Three-hundred and twenty-six patients met the inclusion criteria for this study. Seventy-two (22.09%) were discharged with a feeding tube and 70 (97.22%) of this subgroup were younger than 12 months at the time of surgery. Variables that increased the risk of being discharged with a feeding tube included patient age, The Society of Thoracic Surgeons-European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery score, procedure group, aspiration, and reflux. Speech-language pathology was the most frequently utilised consulting service for patients discharged with feeding tubes (90.28%) while other services were not frequently consulted. The median length of stay was increased from 4 to 10 days for patients who required an enteral feeding tube at discharge. DISCUSSION: Multidisciplinary management protocol and interventions should be developed and standardised to improve feeding outcomes following congenital heart surgery.

Implementation and Evaluation of a Virtual Elective in Otolaryngology in the Time of COVID-19.

OBJECTIVE: To develop and evaluate a virtual otolaryngology medical student elective created during the COVID-19 crisis with the intention of teaching the basic tenets of otolaryngology and increasing exposure to the specialty. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey. SETTING: Emory University School of Medicine. METHODS: A 1-week virtual otolaryngology curriculum was offered to third- and fourth-year medical students that centered on the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Foundation's handbook Primary Care in Otolaryngology (fourth edition). The course covered a variety of topics and was conducted remotely via online video conferencing software. We applied multiple teaching modalities and surveyed students regarding the effectiveness of the course. Mixed methods analysis was employed to analyze the course data. RESULTS: Twelve students participated; 67% reported their baseline precourse understanding of otolaryngology in the "poor-fair" range. After the course, 92% of students reported increased understanding, with 42% and 58% reporting "good" and "very good" understanding, respectively. Following completion of the course, posttest scores on summative assessments were significantly higher than pretest scores (P < .001). Ninety-two percent of students reported either "increased" or "greatly increased" interest in otolaryngology postcourse. Qualitative survey results revealed students' appreciation of course organization, formative assessments, and case-based learning. CONCLUSIONS: An otolaryngology elective administered through a virtual format can be effective at providing an educational experience and garnering interest in the field. Positive exposure to otolaryngology can increase medical students' interest in pursuing the specialty and expand their general knowledge of consultation, diagnosis, and management in otolaryngology.

A Strategy for Undergraduate Medical Education in Urology During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

OBJECTIVE: To provide a framework for a virtual curriculum during the COVID-19 pandemic for medical student educators that introduces and teaches clinical concepts important in urology and surgical specialties in general. METHODS: We created a 1-week virtual urology course utilizing interactive lectures, case-based exercises, and faculty-proctored surgical video reviews. Students were assigned self-study modules and participated in case-based discussions and presentations on a topic of their choice. Students' perceptions of urology as a specialty and the utility of the course was evaluated through pre- and postcourse surveys. Understanding of urologic content was evaluated with a multiple-choice exam. RESULTS: A total of nine students were enrolled in the course. All students reported increased understanding of the common urologic diagnoses and of urology as a specialty by an average of 2.5 points on a 10-point Likert scale (Cohen's measure of effect size: 3.2). Additionally, 56% of students reported increased interest, 22% reported no change and 22% reported a decreased interest in pursuing urology as a specialty following the course. Students self-reported increased knowledge of a variety of urologic topics on a 10-point Likert scale. The average exam score on the multiple-choice exam improved from 50% before the course to 89% after the course. CONCLUSIONS: Various teaching techniques can be employed through a virtual platform to introduce medical students to the specialty of urology and increase clinical knowledge surrounding common urologic conditions. As the longevity of the COVID-19 pandemic becomes increasingly apparent and virtual teaching is normalized, these techniques can have far-reaching utility within the traditional medical student surgical curriculum.

Efficacy of Percutaneous Tibial Nerve Stimulation for Overactive Bladder in Women and Men at a Safety Net Hospital.

PURPOSE: We investigated efficacy and compliance related to percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation in patients treated for overactive bladder at a large, urban safety net hospital. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Consecutive patients who underwent percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation at Grady Memorial Hospital from May 2015 through January 2019 were included in our cohort and records were reviewed retrospectively. Primary outcomes of interest included self-reported urinary symptoms and episodes of urinary incontinence. Our secondary outcome of interest was patient compliance, defined as completion of 12 or more treatment sessions. Descriptive analysis and paired t-tests were performed. RESULTS: Of the 50 patients with a mean ± SD age of 59 ± 12 years 80% were black, 52% were male, 34% were uninsured and 54% subscribed to government insurance. Prior treatment included behavioral modification in 100% of cases, anticholinergics in 86% and mirabegron in 4%. Patients completed a mean of 10.7 ± 2.7 of the 12 planned weekly percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation treatments. Of the patients 70% completed all 12 weekly treatments and 77% of those who completed 12 treatments continued to maintenance treatment. After percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation treatment average symptoms improved across all metrics, including mean daytime frequency (from 11.0 to 6.6 episodes per day or -24.5%), nighttime frequency (from 4.8 to 2.5 episodes per night or -47.1%), urgency score (from 3.4 to 1.9 or -42.1%) and incontinence (from 1.6 to 0.4 episodes per day or -79.6%) (each p <0.001). A total of 43 patients (86%) reported symptom improvement. CONCLUSIONS: Percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation had favorable efficacy and compliance in a traditionally underserved patient population. This should be considered as a feasible modality to manage overactive bladder symptoms in patients in a similar demographic.