Bilateral localized bullous pemphigoid in a young adult patient: A case report.

Bullous pemphigoid is the most common autoimmune subepidermal blistering disease, which typically presents in the elderly. Localized bullous pemphigoid is a rare variant of bullous pemphigoid, with only about 100 cases reported up to date. In this report, we describe a 32-year-old healthy male patient with bilateral hemorrhagic bullae and erosive lesions limited to the lower extremities. A biopsy for hematoxylin and eosin stain and direct immunofluorescence established the diagnosis of bullous pemphigoid. The blistering responded well to oral and topical steroids. The exact etiology of this rare variant of bullous pemphigoid remains unknown, leading to ongoing debates and numerous suggested hypotheses.

Clinicopathological Survey of 204 Rosacea Patients Regarding Rosacea Subgroups and Severity.

INTRODUCTION: Few studies have evaluated the histopathological characteristics of clinical rosacea subtypes in detail. OBJECTIVES: To assess rosacea histopathological features in correspondence to clinical subgroups. METHODS: The histopathological findings of 204 rosacea patients were analyzed retrospectively and were compared among clinical subtypes. RESULTS: Thirt-Two Percent of patients were male and 68% were female. Seventy-three patients had erythematotelangiectatic rosacea (ETR) and 110 had papulopustular rosacea (PPR), 12 were ETR + PPR, 4 ocular, 2 phymatous, and 3 had Morbihan's edema. Perivascular and perifollicular lymphohistiocytic infiltration, perifollicular exocytosis, follicular spongiosis, and ectatic vessels were almost found in all subtypes. Solar elastosis was higher in ETR. Spongiosis, exocytosis of inflammatory cells into epidermis, acanthosis, and granulomatous reaction were higher in PPR. Inflammatory cells exocytosis was more in PPR and phymatous. Demodex folliculorum was identified in 27% of ETR, 33.6% of PPR, 50% of phymatous, one ocular patient, and none of Morbihan edema. Demodex brevis were found in 5% of ETR, 3% of PPR, and 50% of phymatous. Demodex brevis not folliculorum was more in phymatous. Spongiosis was the most common finding in ocular rosacea. CONCLUSIONS: Spongiosis, exocytosis of inflammatory cells, and granulomatous reactions were more in PPR. Solar elastosis was more in ETR. Histopathological findings were compatible with clinical subgroups.

Dermoscopy of cutaneous granulomatous disorders: A study of 107 cases.

BACKGROUND: Cutaneous granulomatous disorders (CGDs) can share some features, but an accurate assessment of various findings and their pattern can be useful in differentiating them. In addition to common dermoscopic findings for CGDs, some peculiar dermoscopic characteristics can be helpful in distinguishing them. OBJECTIVE: Herein, we aimed to evaluate dermoscopic findings in patients with CGDs and determine the dermoscopic criteria that could suggest the type of granulomatous disorder. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 107 cases including 75 (70.09%) males and 32 (29.90%) females with an established diagnosis of cutaneous leishmaniasis (n = 49), cutaneous sarcoidosis (n = 23), granuloma annulare (GA) (n = 18), and tattoo granuloma (n = 17) confirmed by clinical and pathological studies were included. Based on the previous studies available in the literature, we wrote a checklist containing dermoscopic features of CGDs. Afterward, two dermatologists independently reviewed all dermoscopic images for the presence or absence of each item on the checklist. Descriptive analysis, fisher exact, chi-square, and t-test were used. The granulomatous disorders with larger sample sizes were selected for further analysis, including the univariate and conditional multivariate logistic regressions. RESULTS: The most prevalent nonvascular findings in all of our CGD patients were white scaling (N = 67%, 62.61%), diffuse or localized orange structureless areas (N = 53%, 49.53%), and diffuse erythema (N = 48%, 44.85%). Furthermore, the most frequent vascular findings in all of our CGD cases were branching and arborizing vessels (N = 30%, 28.03%), linear irregular (N = 30%, 28.03%), and dotted vessels (N = 27%, 25.23%). CONCLUSION: For differentiating leishmaniasis from sarcoidosis by dermoscopy, white scaling and white scarring areas are more suggestive of cutaneous leishmaniasis, whereas the presence of arborizing vessels would be more in favor of sarcoidosis. When comparing GA to cutaneous leishmaniasis, the latter significantly shows more linear irregular vessels, hairpin vessels, white scaling, and white scarring areas. In the case of differentiating sarcoidosis from GA, the presence of hairpin vessels would be suggestive of sarcoidosis.

Efficacy and safety of oral pioglitazone in the management of lichen planopilaris in comparison with clobetasol: A randomized clinical trial.

Lichen planopilaris (LPP) is a scarring alopecia for which no treatment with remarkable effect has been identified. Pioglitazone has been reported as a possible therapeutic option. To compare the efficacy and safety of pioglitazone with clobetasol in LPP. This randomized, double-blind, parallel-group was conducted at Razi hospital. Patients were treated either with pioglitazone 15 mg/daily or clobetasol lotion 0.05% once at night for 6 months. Patients were visited every 2 months to assess the lichen planopilaris activity index (LPPAI) and record probable adverse events. Forty patients (mean age: 43.6 years; 62.5% female) were randomized 1:1. The mean of LPPAI at baseline and last session were 4.68 ± 1.97 and 2.59 ± 0.97 in the clobetasol group and 5.01 ± 1.71 and 3.04 ± 1.36 in the pioglitazone group, respectively. Both treatments significantly decreased the LPPAI over the two-month interval visits (p < 0.001). No significant difference in the LPPAI reduction was detected between groups. Regarding the safety profile, three clobetasol-treated patients developed folliculitis, and two in the pioglitazone group developed mild headaches. Pioglitazone effectively controlled the signs and symptoms of the LPP with no serious side effects. It can be considered a treatment option for LPP, although it was not superior to clobetasol.

Self-limited acne agminate-like granulomatous reaction to facial laser rejuvenation in a patient with comedonal acne vulgaris.

Minimally invasive fractional rejuvenation was developed to overcome the drawbacks of the traditional ablative laser. The Fotona 4D laser is one of these lasers used for face lifting. This laser uses two wavelengths such as Nd-YAG 1064 and Er-YAG 2940 nm in four different modes of non-ablative and ablative fractional laser to induce bulk heating in different tissue layers of facial skin. Although the overall rate of fractional laser complications is much lower than that of traditional techniques, recent studies have shown that fractional lasers can cause complications such as acne, milia, prolonged erythema, infections, and pigmentary alterations.In this report, we present a very unique case of a 41-year-old female patient with mild comedonal acne who developed severe acne agminate-like granulomatous reaction following fractional rejuvenation laser therapy that resolved spontaneously within 2 months after laser therapy. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first case of acne agminate as a side effect of rejuvenation laser therapy.As ruptured hair follicles are proposed as a pathogenic factor in both acne agminate and developing acne following fractional laser therapies, it is recommended to cautiously use resurfacing fractional lasers or to thoroughly treat acne before laser therapy due to the risk of developing a granulomatous reaction.