Spatial working memory and hippocampal size across pregnancy in rats.

The present experiments investigated the effects of pregnancy on performance in the Morris water maze and on hippocampal volume. In the first study, pregnant rats (in between the first and second trimester) outperformed nonpregnant rats on the Morris water maze on 1 day of testing. In the second study, rats were tested in a working memory variation of the maze in which the spatial location of the platform varied. Pregnant females traveled shorter distances than nonpregnant females during the first two trimesters, but performed worse than nonpregnant females during the third trimester. Latency measures showed a similar profile. Group differences in performance were not related to changes in swim speed. However, changes in performance in pregnant females may be related to estrogen, progesterone, and/or corticosterone levels during pregnancy, with low levels of estradiol and high levels of progesterone being associated with better performance. There were no significant differences between pregnant and nonpregnant animals on any of the brain measures, although pregnant animals tended to have a smaller hippocampus than nonpregnant animals. These results indicate that pregnancy can affect performance, possibly related to the hormonal changes that accompany pregnancy.

Intraocular transfer and simultaneous processing of stimuli presented in different visual fields of the pigeon.

Differences in neuroanatomy, optics, and function indicate the operation of 2 visual systems in pigeons, a frontal field system and a lateral field system. Communication between these systems was examined with a delayed matching-to-sample task in which sample stimuli could be presented in either the frontal or lateral fields. In Experiment 1, matching acquired with the lateral field transferred to the frontal field but did not transfer from the frontal field to the lateral field. When different samples were presented simultaneously to the frontal and lateral fields in Experiment 2, pigeons preferred to match the sample in the frontal field, but lateral field information interfered to some extent with frontal field matching. The 3rd experiment showed left lateral field dominance when the left and right fields were simultaneously presented with different sample stimuli; left field dominance was not complete, as pigeons sometimes matched the right-field sample.

Memory for pictures of upright and inverted primate faces in humans (Homo sapiens), squirrel monkeys (Saimiri sciureus), and pigeons (Columba livia).

Humans (Homo sapiens) and squirrel monkeys (Saimiri sciureus) were tested for memory of upright and inverted primate faces. Working memory was tested in Experiment 1 with a delayed matching-to-sample procedure, and reference memory was examined in Experiment 2 by requiring subjects to learn to discriminate between successive pairs of upright or inverted pictures. Both human and monkey subjects showed better working memory for upright than for inverted human faces and better reference memory for upright than for inverted human and great ape faces. In Experiment 3, reference memory tests with pigeons (Columba livia) showed no effects of inversion on rate of learning with face pictures. We argue that these findings cannot be explained easily by an individual primate's lifetime experiences with primate faces. We suggest that similar evolved mechanisms for primate face recognition in people and monkeys are responsible for the pattern of data reported.

Central-place foraging by Rattus norvegicus on a radial maze.

We studied central-place foraging in rats (Rattus norvegicus) by placing food items that varied in size and weight at the ends of a 4-arm radial maze. In Experiments 1-3, rats increasingly tended to carry food to the center of the maze as the size of those items increased. Very large food items often were hoarded in the center. Rats consumed food faster on the arms than in the center, and rats traveled faster when carrying food than when not. Blocking arm entrances increased travel time between the center and the arms and decreased food carrying at every item weight except the largest. In Experiments 4-6, important conditions that influence the degree of food-carrying behavior were discovered; these were the intersection of maze arms, the presence of a conspecific, and the use of open vs. closed maze arms.