Generalization to atypical antipsychotic drugs depends on training dose in rats trained to discriminate 1.25 mg/kg clozapine versus 5.0 mg/kg clozapine versus vehicle in a three-choice drug discrimination task.

The prototypical atypical antipsychotic drug (APD) clozapine (CLZ) elicits a discriminative cue that appears to be similar to the stimulus properties elicited by atypical, but not typical, antipsychotic drugs in two-choice drug discrimination procedures. However, the ability of CLZ to generalize to atypical APDs depends on the training dose, since several atypical APDs (e.g. sertindole, risperidone) do not substitute for a 5.0 mg/kg CLZ training dose in rats, but do so for a 1.25 mg/kg CLZ training dose. Yet, a 1.25 mg/kg CLZ discriminative stimulus has not generalized to all atypical APDs either (e.g. quetiapine); thus, both 1.25 mg/kg and 5.0 mg/kg CLZ discriminative stimuli may be necessary to provide a better screen for atypical APDs. The present study sought to determine whether a three-choice 1.25 mg/kg CLZ versus 5.0 mg/kg CLZ versus vehicle drug discrimination task in rats might better distinguish atypical from typical APDs. Adult male Sprague-Dawley rats were trained in this three-choice drug discrimination task with a fixed ratio 30 reinforcement schedule for food. Clozapine produced full substitution (>or=80% condition-appropriate responding) for both the 1.25 mg/kg CLZ dose (ED50=0.09 mg/kg) and the 5.0 mg/kg CLZ dose (ED50=2.71 mg/kg). The atypical APD olanzapine produced full substitution for the 5.0 mg/kg CLZ dose, but not for the 1.25 mg/kg CLZ dose (ED50=1.55 mg/kg). In contrast, the atypical APD quetiapine produced full substitution for the 1.25 mg/kg CLZ dose (ED50=0.13 mg/kg), but not for the 5.0 mg/kg CLZ dose. Similarly, the atypical APD sertindole produced full substitution for only the 1.25 mg/kg CLZ dose (ED50=0.94 mg/kg). Risperidone, another atypical APD, produced partial substitution (>or=60% and

Effects of antipsychotic drugs on operant responding after acute and repeated administration.

RATIONALE: The current generation of atypical antipsychotic drugs represents an improvement over traditional ("typical") antipsychotics in many respects. However, a theoretical framework and adequate preclinical models have not yet been developed to predict or explain differences among the atypical antipsychotics, a necessary component of future development. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of the present set of experiments was to identify differences between the acute and subchronic effects of several atypical antipsychotic drugs and the typical antipsychotic haloperidol on operant responding in rats. METHODS: The effects of haloperidol and the atypical antipsychotics clozapine, olanzapine, risperidone, sertindole, quetiapine, remoxipride, and thioridazine were determined in rats trained to respond for food reward under a multiple fixed ratio 30/fixed interval 60 s schedule. A profile of the acute effects of each drug on response rates, response durations, and within-session effects were determined. Next, the dose of each drug that produced 75% suppression of response rates was administered for 16 consecutive days to determine whether or not tolerance would develop to the rate-suppressing effects of that dose. RESULTS: All drugs produced dose-related decreases in response rates. Only haloperidol and risperidone produced significant increases in response duration, while only haloperidol and remoxipride displayed within-session response decrements. Tolerance was evident for clozapine and to a lesser extent thioridazine. CONCLUSIONS: These results illustrate that the current generation of atypical antipsychotics are a heterogeneous group and that operant procedures may be useful for identifying differences preclinically. Specifically, clozapine appears to possess properties that distinguish it from other atypical antipsychotics, particularly after repeated dosing.

Clozapine discrimination with a low training dose distinguishes atypical from typical antipsychotic drugs in rats.

RATIONALE: Previous drug discrimination studies with clozapine have not reliably distinguished between atypical and typical antipsychotics. OBJECTIVES: The present study was conducted to determine whether low-dose clozapine drug discrimination could distinguish atypical from typical antipsychotics. METHODS: Rats were trained to discriminate 1.25 mg/kg clozapine from vehicle in a two-lever drug discrimination procedure. RESULTS: Generalization testing revealed full substitution with the atypical antipsychotics olanzapine (90.3% maximum generalization), sertindole (99.8%), and risperidone (87.1%) and partial substitution for quetiapine (seroquel, 66.4%) and the typical antipsychotics haloperidol (56.8%) and thioridazine (74.3%). Remoxipride (23.1%) and the typical antipsychotics chlorpromazine (27.9%) and fluphenazine (29.5%) did not reliably substitute for clozapine. CONCLUSIONS: In contrast to previous clozapine drug discrimination studies with higher training doses, the atypical antipsychotics olanzapine, sertindole, and risperidone reliably substituted for clozapine while typical antipsychotics did not. These results suggest that low-dose clozapine drug discrimination may be a more sensitive assay for distinguishing atypical from typical antipsychotic drugs.