Foundations Invest In Environmental Health.

Nearly one in four deaths globally are due to environmental hazards such as air and water pollution, according to the World Health Organization. However, knowledge about how the environment affects health and health equity outcomes has not been well integrated into decisions that shape the conditions in which people live, work, and play. To address this challenge, US foundations have invested millions of dollars to make it easier to incorporate environmental health information into decisions ranging from family purchases and governmental policy making to business, medical, and other professional practices. This article summarizes grant making aimed at improving environmental conditions to improve health and health equity outcomes. We provide examples of environmental health grants that focus on tools that the public, policy makers, and professionals can use in making decisions. We found that the investment in and attention to environmental factors, including in work addressing social determinants of health, have been insufficient to realize the potential for reducing negative environmental impacts on health and health disparities. We argue that the grant making highlighted here has increased knowledge that could enable more widespread consideration of environmental health in many decisions, with positive effects on health and health equity.

Analysis of primary fine particle national ambient air quality standard metrics.

In accordance with the Clean Air Act, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is currently reviewing its National Ambient Air Quality Standards for particulate matter, which are required to provide an adequate margin of safety to populations, including susceptible subgroups. Based on the latest scientific, health, and technical information about particle pollution, EPA staff recommends establishing more protective health-based fine particle standards. Since the last standards review, epidemiologic studies have continued to find associations between short-term and long-term exposure to particulate matter and cardiopulmonary morbidity and mortality at current pollution levels. This study analyzed the spatial and temporal variability of fine particulate (PM2.5) monitoring data for the Northeast and the continental United States to assess the protectiveness of various levels, forms, and combinations of 24-hr and annual health-based standards currently recommended by EPA staff and the Clean Air Scientific Advisory Committee. Recommended standards have the potential for modest or substantial increases in protection in the Northeast, ranging from an additional 13-83% of the population of the region who are living in areas not likely to meet new standards and thereby benefiting from compliance with more protective air pollution controls. Within recommended standard ranges, an optimal 24-hr (98th percentile)/annual standard suite occurs at 30/12 microg/m3, providing short- and long-term health protection for a substantial percentage of both Northeast (84%) and U.S. (78%) populations. In addition, the Northeast region will not benefit as widely as the nation as a whole if less stringent standards are selected. Should the 24-hr (98th percentile) standard be set at 35 microg/m3, Northeast and U.S. populations will receive 16-48% and 7-17% less protection than a 30 microg/m3 standard, respectively, depending on the level of the annual standard. A 30/12 microg/m3 standard suite also provides nearly equivalent 24-hr and annual control of PM2.5 distributions across the United States, thereby ensuring a more uniform and consistent level of protection than unmatched or "controlling" and "backstop" standards. This could occur even within EPA staff's recommended range of standard suites, where 22-43% of the monitors in the country could meet a controlling standard but fail to meet the combined backstop standard, resulting in inconsistent short- and long-term protection across the country. An equivalent standards combination of 30/12 microg/m3 would minimize the wide variation of protectiveness of 24-hr and annual PM2.5 concentrations. Furthermore, given recent associations of subdaily exposures and acute adverse health effects, in the absence of a subdaily averaging metric, a stringent 24-hr standard will more effectively control maximum hourly and multihourly peak concentrations than a weaker standard.

Fine particulate matter national ambient air quality standards: public health impact on populations in the northeastern United States.

In this article we identify the magnitude of general and susceptible populations within the northeastern United States that would benefit from compliance with alternative U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) annual and 24-hr mass-based standards for particulate matter (PM) with an aerodynamic diameter < or = 2.5 microm (PM2.5). Understanding the scale of susceptibility in relation to the stringency or protectiveness of PM standards is important to achieving the public health protection required by the Clean Air Act of 1970. Evaluative tools are therefore necessary to place into regulatory context available health and monitoring data appropriate to the current review of the PM National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS). Within the New England, New Jersey, and New York study area, 38% of the total population are < 18 or > or =65 years of age, 4-18% of adults have cardiopulmonary or diabetes health conditions, 12-15% of children have respiratory allergies or lifetime asthma, and 72% of all persons (across child, adult, and elderly age groups) live in densely populated urban areas with elevated PM2.5 concentrations likely creating heightened exposure scenarios. The analysis combined a number of data sets to show that compliance with a range of alternative annual and 24-hr PM2.5 standard groupings would affect a large fraction of the total population in the Northeast. This work finds that current PM2.5 standards in the eight-state study area affect only 16% of the general population, who live in counties that do not meet the existing annual/24-hr standard of 15/65 microg/m3. More protective PM2.5 standards recommended or enacted by California and Canada would protect 84-100% of the Northeast population. Standards falling within current ranges recommended by the U.S. EPA would protect 29-100% of the Northeast population. These considerations suggest that the size of general and susceptible populations affected by the stringency of alternative PM standards has broad implications for risk management and direct bearing on the U.S. EPA's current NAAQS review and implementation.

Operations for gastric ulcer: a long-term study.

This study assesses the long-term results of operations for benign gastric ulcers. Three-hundred forty-nine patients operated upon between 1950-1979 have been followed over the past 20 years with a mean and median follow-up of 11.8 and 11.1 years. Fifty-five per cent of the patients had a gastric resection without vagotomy; 19.8 per cent had gastric resection with vagotomy; and 20.3 per cent had vagotomy, pyloroplasty, and wedge excision or biopsy of the ulcer. Operations were selected based on the type of ulcer (Types 1-4), whether the surgeon suspected cancer preoperatively, whether the operations was elective or an emergency, and the age and general health of the patient (presence of significant co-morbid disease). Overall mortality was 6.9 per cent, with a mortality for elective operations 3.6 per cent, and for emergency operations of 32.5 per cent. Age and cardiovascular disease were significant factors in operative mortality and morbidity. All operations were equivalent in long-term results. Excellent to good results were obtained in 92 per cent of patients, with an ulcer recurrence rate of 4 per cent. We conclude that vagotomy, pyloroplasty, and wedge excision or biopsy of a benign gastric ulcer is a comparable operation to a more major gastric resection, with or without vagotomy, in the surgical management of gastric ulcer. The addition of vagotomy to gastric resection does not appear to improve long-term results.

Efficacy of preoperative bowel preparation at home.

A preliminary study was designed to determine whether preoperative bowel preparation for colorectal surgery could be performed safely at home. Medical charts of 62 patients covering 4 years of elective major colorectal surgery done by a single general surgeon were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were divided into four groups, depending on the year in which they had surgery. Each patient had been given an easy-to-understand instruction sheet as well as prescriptions for mannitol solution, neomycin, and erythromycin base. The changeover from hospital-based to home-based bowel cleansing was gradual. In the first year of the study, all patients had bowel preparation in hospital; in the final year, 88% of patients had bowel cleansing at home. Home bowel preparation resulted in no identifiable increase in morbidity or mortality. No death or wound infection occurred in any patient group. Preoperative home bowel preparation can be done safely by the patient without increased morbidity or mortality. Ordering this preparation for most colorectal surgery patients could save about $150 million in hospital costs per year in the United States.

The causes of low oestrogen excretion in pregnancy: assessment of the fetal contribution by steroid measurements post partum.

Oestrogen levels in urine from 21 normotensive and 13 hypertensive pregnant women were moderately correlated (r = 0.48) with levels of 3 beta-hydroxy-5-ene steroids (oestrogen precursors) in urine from their infants. In five infants from otherwise normal pregnancies in which oestrogen excretion was very low, levels of 3 beta-hydroxy-5-ene steroids were significantly lower than normal while there was no difference between hypertensives and normals. Levels of urinary cortisol metabolites in the infants were moderately correlated with 3 beta-hydroxy-5-ene steroids (r = 0.55) and were especially low in 2 out of 5 infants in the series suffering from distress during delivery. We conclude that subnormal fetal steroidogenesis rather than reduced placental metabolism is the most common cause of low oestrogen excretion of unknown aetiology. A factor in the increased perinatal risk in this group may be an associated insufficient cortisol synthesis by the fetus.