Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Drugs Dermatol ; 23(6): 456-462, 2024 Jun 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38834222

RESUMO

Sunscreen is an essential way to protect against photodamage from ultraviolet (UV) radiation. Despite the recognized benefits of sunscreen in preventing skin damage from UV light, its use varies across different patient groups. This cross-sectional, questionnaire-based study aims to uncover the sunscreen usage patterns, preferences, and barriers among non-Hispanic White (NHW) and skin of color (SOC) individuals. Our findings demonstrate that NHW individuals are more likely to wear sunscreen daily (31% NHW vs 25% SOC) and reapply sunscreen at least once a day (76% NHW vs 45% SOC) compared with SOC individuals. SOC individuals demonstrate a willingness to use sunscreen, but they face barriers such as cost (2% NHW vs 16% SOC), lack of knowledge in finding suitable products (22% NHW vs 41% SOC), and concerns about white cast (7% NHW vs 25% SOC). SOC individuals are less likely to know the difference between mineral and chemical sunscreen (49% NHW vs 29% SOC), less likely to learn about sunscreen from dermatologists (36% NHW vs 22% SOC), and more likely to prefer sunscreen from brands owned by people of color (13% NHW vs 47% SOC).  In addition to analyzing the broader categories of NHW and SOC, subgroup analysis was conducted on specific subgroups, including Black, Asian, and Hispanic groups. Herein, we highlight differences in motivations, sunscreen preferences, sources of information, and knowledge levels about sun protection between NHW and SOC individuals. By uncovering the unique needs and challenges faced by SOC individuals, we aim to improve culturally competent patient education and promote effective sun protection practices across diverse populations. J Drugs Dermatol. 2024;23(6):456-462.     doi:10.36849/JDD.8268.


Assuntos
Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Preferência do Paciente , Protetores Solares , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adulto Jovem , Estudos Transversais , Queimadura Solar/prevenção & controle , Protetores Solares/administração & dosagem , Inquéritos e Questionários , Raios Ultravioleta/efeitos adversos , Brancos , Negro ou Afro-Americano , Asiático , Hispânico ou Latino
2.
J Biophotonics ; 17(2): e202300388, 2024 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38019097

RESUMO

Photobiomodulation (PBM) can be used to treat a range of conditions in dermatology. PBM refers to the changes induced by red (RL, 620-700 nm) and near-infrared (NIR, 700-1440 nm) light. Light radiation-induced DNA damage is a major contributor to aging and skin cancer. It is crucial to study the effects of PBM on DNA to ensure safety. Our lab previously demonstrated that RL (633 ± 6 nm) did not result in human dermal fibroblasts (HDFs) DNA damage. This study employed similar methods to investigate NIR effects. Commercially available LED-NIR (830 ± 5 nm) panels (66, 132, and 264 J/cm2 ) did not result in DNA damage measured by cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers and pyrimidine-6,4-pyrimidone photoproducts in HDFs compared to temperature-matched controls immediately, 3 h, and 24 h following irradiation and compared to positive and negative controls. This demonstrates that LED-NIR does not damage DNA in HDFs in vitro.


Assuntos
Dano ao DNA , Pele , Humanos , Pele/efeitos da radiação , Raios Infravermelhos , Fibroblastos/efeitos da radiação , DNA
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...