Do Birth Outcomes Predicted by Occipital Position Inform Definitions of Occiput Posterior and Occiput Transverse?

Fetal head position significantly influences birth outcomes, with higher rates of complications observed when the fetal head is in the Occiput Posterior (OP) position compared to Occiput Transverse (OT) or Occiput Anterior (OA) positions. There is no consensus in the current literature on the precise rotational point at which the fetal occiput shifts from posterior to transverse, reducing clarity in both scientific and clinical communication. Different studies employ varying definitions of these positions, which affects management decisions. This study aims to determine if a definable threshold exists between the directly posterior and directly transverse positions that correlates with different birth outcomes, thereby proposing a consistent and clinically useful definition for OP versus OT. We analyzed ultrasound data from 570 patients at full dilatation from five previous studies, correlating the angle of the fetal occiput (noted on a clock-face) with birth outcomes. Adverse outcomes were defined as cesarean delivery, instrumental vaginal delivery, significant postpartum hemorrhage (500 ml or more), obstetric anal sphincter injury, five-minute Apgar scores <7, arterial cord pH <7, base excess less than -12, or neonatal intensive care unit admission. The analysis was conducted using SAS version 9.4. The study found a continuous relationship between the fetal occipital angle and adverse birth outcomes without a distinct threshold separating OP from OT positions. No clear inflection point was demonstrated in pregnancy outcomes between OT and OP. The relationship between the angle of occiput position and pregnancy outcomes was continuous: the closer the fetal head was to directly OP, the higher the likelihood of adverse outcomes. Given the lack of a clear cut-off and to improve consistency in future research, we recommend dividing the occiput position into four quadrants of 90 degrees each. This classification could standardize reporting and potentially improve clinical decision-making regarding fetal position during labor.

Factors influencing uptake of the COVID-19 vaccination among pregnant women in Australia: A cross-sectional survey.

BACKGROUND: Mounting evidence shows the risk of COVID-19 on perinatal outcomes, as well as the safety and efficacy of vaccination during pregnancy. However, little is known about vaccine uptake among pregnant women in Australia, including women who are culturally and linguistically diverse (CALD), and about sources of information pregnant women use when making decisions about vaccines. We aimed to determine the proportion of pregnant women who had been vaccinated and to identify factors associated with vaccine uptake or decline during pregnancy. METHOD: A cross-sectional, anonymous, online survey was conducted from October 2021 to January 2022 in two metropolitan hospitals in New South Wales, Australia. RESULTS: Of 914 pregnant women, 406 (44%) did not speak English at home. Overall, 101 (11%) received a vaccine prepregnancy and 699 (76%) during pregnancy. In the nonvaccinated cohort, 87 (76%) declined vaccination during pregnancy. The uptake was more than 87% among women during pregnancy who received information from government or health professional websites but 37% when received from personal blogs. The main reasons for vaccine uptake were (1) hearing that COVID-19 affects pregnant women, (2) being concerned about the COVID-19 outbreak, and (3) receiving vaccine recommendation from a general practitioner. In a multivariable logistic regression, three main factors associated with declining or feeling unsure about vaccination were (1) concerns about the safety of the COVID-19 vaccine, (2) lack of trust and being unsatisfied with the information received about COVID-19 vaccination during pregnancy, and (3) doubting the importance of COVID-19 vaccine. CONCLUSION: Clinicians play a critical role in counseling women to alleviate vaccine fear, support vaccine acceptance, and direct women to use reliable information sources, such as government and professional healthcare organizations, for information about vaccines.

Who is responsible for postpartum contraception advice and provision? The perspective of hospital-based maternity clinicians in New South Wales, Australia.

Access to postpartum contraception is critical for the health of the mother and subsequent pregnancies. However, the differential roles and responsibilities of maternity care providers in contraception discussions and provision are often unclear. Our study, part of a larger study on midwifery provision of contraceptive implants, presents the perspectives of hospital-based maternity clinicians. Participants suggested that contraception discussions and provision are a shared responsibility of maternity care providers but identified inconsistencies and issues with current approaches. Access to contraception could be improved through more routine discussions antenatally and postnatally and greater collaboration between maternity care providers in hospital, community and primary care settings.

A snapshot of women's and clinicians' perceptions of the double balloon catheter for induction of labor.

INTRODUCTION: Induction of labor (IOL) is rising globally and is growing steadily in the state of New South Wales, Australia. There are numerous methods of induction of labor, including the double balloon catheter (DBC). There is minimal evidence on women's attitudes and experiences and clinician's opinions on the use of the DBC. This study aims to explore the views regarding DBC insertion and effectiveness from women induced with a DBC and clinicians involved in the catheter insertion and care. METHODS: This study is a descriptive survey of two prospective, de-identified, self-reported questionnaires which were completed in 2016. One questionnaire was administered to term pregnant women that were admitted to the antenatal ward post IOL, and the other was completed by midwives and obstetric doctors working in the ward at the time. RESULTS: The DBC appeared to be a well-accepted method of cervical ripening among women (61%) and clinicians (>82%). Success of DBC to achieve an artificial rupture of membrane post removal, directly correlates to women's acceptance (61%). While most clinicians (59-67%) perceived insertion of DBC in an outpatient setting and then women discharged home was appropriate, only 13% of women were in favor. On the logistics of the procedure in respect to insertion and removal of the DBC, there were differences of opinion, with only 43% of women, 77% of midwives and 33% of doctors stating that the timing of insertion and removal needed to be improved. CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the need to undertake qualitative research to further explore women's views and perceptions on IOL in order to ensure that clinical practice is woman-centered and evidenced-based, and to guide policy and protocol.

Group Clinical Supervision for midwives and burnout: a cluster randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: There are major shortfalls in the midwifery workforce which has been exacerbated by the COVID 19 pandemic. Midwives have high levels of burnout and many, often early career midwives, are planning to leave the profession. There are reports of a poor workplace culture in maternity units, including bullying. Support is essential for the welfare of the workforce to be able to cope with the demands of their jobs. Supportive strategies, such as Clinical Supervision, a recognised approach in healthcare, enable reflection in a facilitated, structured way, and can enhance professional standards. The purpose of this research is to study burnout levels in midwives, those exiting their workplace and perceptions of workplace culture in relation to access to, and attendance of, monthly Clinical Supervision. METHODS: This study will be a cluster randomised controlled trial of maternity sites within Sydney and the surrounding districts. Twelve sites will be recruited and half will receive monthly Clinical Supervision for up to two years. Midwives from all sites will be requested to complete 6-monthly surveys comprising validated measurement tools: the Copenhagen Burnout Inventory (CBI), the Australian Midwifery Workplace Culture (AMWoC) tool and the Clinical Supervision Evaluation Questionnaire (CSEQ) (the latter for intervention sites only). Primary outcomes are the levels of burnout in midwives (using the CBI). Secondary outcomes will be the quality of the intervention (using the CSEQ), perceptions of workplace culture (using the AMWoC tool) and midwives' intention to stay in their role/profession, as well as sick leave rates and numbers of exiting staff. We will also determine the dose effect - ie the impact in relation to how many Clinical Supervision sessions the midwives have attended, as well as other supportive workplace strategies such as mentoring/coaching on outcomes. DISCUSSION: Through attending monthly Clinical Supervision we hypothesise that midwives will report less burnout and more positive perceptions of workplace culture than those in the control sites. The potential implications of which are a productive workforce giving high quality care with the flow-on effect of having physically and psychologically well women and their babies. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The ACTRN Registration number is ACTRN12621000545864p , dated 10/05/2021,.

Prophylactic rotation for malposition in the second stage of labor: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate if manual rotation, undertaken during labor, of fetuses in occiput posterior or occiput transverse position led to an increased rate of spontaneous vaginal delivery. DATA SOURCES: Searches were performed in MEDLINE, Ovid, Scopus, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials with the use of a combination of keywords and text words related to "occiput posterior," "occiput transverse," and "manual rotation" from inception of the databases to July 2021. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: We included all randomized controlled trials evaluating manual rotation of fetuses in the occiput posterior or occiput transverse position during labor. METHODS: The primary outcome was the rate of spontaneous vaginal delivery. Meta-analyses were performed using the random effects model of DerSimonian and Laird to determine the relative risks or mean differences with 95% confidence intervals. RESULTS: A total of 643 records were screened with inclusion of 6 articles and 1002 randomized patients. All included studies compared manual rotation of fetuses in occiput posterior or occiput transverse position, all confirmed using ultrasound examinations, after complete cervical dilation with either no rotation or a sham rotation procedure. There was no difference in the rate of spontaneous vaginal delivery with manual rotation (relative risk, 1.07; 95% confidence interval, 0.95-1.20) nor was there any difference in any other maternal or fetal outcomes. In a subgroup analysis of occiput posterior fetuses, there was a 12.80-minute decrease in the length of the second stage of labor in the manual rotation group (mean difference, -12.80; 95% confidence interval, -22.61 to -2.99). There were no significant differences in any other maternal or fetal outcomes in the occiput posterior subgroup and no differences in the occiput transverse subgroup. CONCLUSION: Prophylactic manual rotation of fetuses in occiput posterior or occiput transverse position, confirmed using ultrasound examination, did not increase the rate of spontaneous vaginal delivery compared with no manual rotation. Manual rotation of the occiput posterior fetal head early during the second stage of labor was associated with a significant 12.8-minute decrease in the length of the second stage of labor with no changes in any other maternal or fetal outcomes. There were no differences demonstrated for fetuses rotated from occiput transverse position or for the combination of occiput posterior and occiput transverse fetuses. Because there is some evidence of benefit, prophylactic manual rotation can be offered to patients during the second stage of labor presenting with occiput posterior position of the fetal head documented during ultrasound examination.

Attributable factors for the rising cesarean delivery rate over 3 decades: an observational cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Cesarean delivery rates continue to rise globally, the reasons for which are incompletely understood. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to characterize the attributable factors for the increasing cesarean delivery rates over a 30-year period within our health network. STUDY DESIGN: This was a planned observational cohort study across 2 hospitals (a large tertiary referral hospital and a metropolitan hospital) in Sydney, Australia using data from a previously published study. The following 2 time periods were compared: 1989-99 and 2009-16, between which the cesarean delivery rate increased from 19% to 30%. The participants were all women who had a cesarean delivery after 24 weeks' gestational age. The data were analyzed using multiple imputation and robust Poisson regression to calculate the differences in the adjusted and unadjusted relative risk of cesarean delivery and estimate the changes in the cesarean delivery rate attributable to maternal and clinical factors. The primary outcome was cesarean delivery. RESULTS: After 576 exclusions, 102,589 births were included in the analysis. Fifty-six percent of the increase in the rate of cesarean delivery was attributed to changes in the distribution of the maternal age, body mass index, and parity and to a history of previous cesarean delivery. An additional 10% of the increase was attributed to changes in the obstetrical management of the following high-risk pregnancies: multiple gestation, malpresentation (mainly breech), and preterm singleton birth. When prelabor cesarean deliveries for maternal choice, suspected fetal compromise, previous pregnancy issues, and suspected large fetus were excluded, 78% of the increase was attributed to either maternal factors or changes in the obstetrical management of these high-risk pregnancies. CONCLUSION: Most of the steep rise in the cesarean delivery rate from 19% to 30% was attributed to changes in the maternal demographic and clinical factors. This observation is relevant to developing preventative strategies that account for nulliparity, age, body mass index, and management of high-risk pregnancies.

Transverse position. Using rotation to aid normal birth-OUTcomes following manual rotation (the TURN-OUT trial): a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: The fetal occiput transverse position in the second stage of labor is associated with adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes. Prophylactic manual rotation in the second stage of labor is considered a safe and easy to perform procedure that has been used to prevent operative deliveries. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine the efficacy of prophylactic manual rotation in the management of the occiput transverse position for preventing operative delivery. We hypothesized that among women who are at ≥37 weeks' gestation with a baby in the occiput transverse position early in the second stage of labor, manual rotation compared with a "sham" rotation will reduce the rate of operative delivery. STUDY DESIGN: A double-blinded, parallel, superiority, multicenter, randomized controlled clinical trial in 3 tertiary hospitals was conducted in Australia. The primary outcome was operative (cesarean, forceps, or vacuum) delivery. Secondary outcomes were cesarean delivery, serious maternal morbidity and mortality, and serious perinatal morbidity and mortality. Outcomes were analyzed by intention to treat. Proportions were compared using χ2 tests adjusted for stratification variables using the Mantel-Haenszel method or Fisher exact test. Planned subgroup analyses by operator experience and technique of manual rotation (digital or whole hand rotation) were performed. The planned sample size was 416 participants (trial registration: ACTRN12613000005752). RESULTS: Here, 160 women with a term pregnancy and a baby in the occiput transverse position in the second stage of labor, confirmed by ultrasound, were randomly assigned to receive either a prophylactic manual rotation (n=80) or a sham procedure (n=80), which was less than our original intended sample size. Operative delivery occurred in 41 of 80 women (51%) assigned to prophylactic manual rotation and 40 of 80 women (50%) assigned to a sham rotation (common risk difference, -4.2% [favors sham rotation]; 95% confidence interval, -21 to 13; P=.63). Among more experienced proceduralists, operative delivery occurred in 24 of 47 women (51%) assigned to manual rotation and 29 of 46 women (63%) assigned to a sham rotation (common risk difference, 11%; 95% confidence interval, -11 to 33; P=.33). Cesarean delivery occurred in 6 of 80 women (7.5%) in the manual rotation group and 7 of 80 women (8.7%) in the sham group. Instrumental (forceps or vacuum) delivery occurred in 35 of 80 women (44%) in the manual rotation group and 33 of 80 women (41%) in the sham group. There was no significant difference in the combined maternal and perinatal outcomes. The trial was terminated early because of limited resources. CONCLUSION: Planned prophylactic manual rotation did not result in fewer operative deliveries. More research is needed in the use of manual rotation from the occiput transverse position for preventing operative deliveries.

Feasibility, acceptability and sustainability of postpartum contraceptive implant provision by midwives in NSW public hospitals.

BACKGROUND: Repeat pregnancy in the first year after a birth is common. Many of these conceptions are unintended and may be prevented by providing access to contraception in the immediate postpartum period. Midwives in the hospital setting could potentially play a greater role in improving postnatal contraception information and provision. AIM: We sought to implement and examine the success of a program training hospital-based midwives in immediate postpartum implant insertion. METHODS: This mixed methods study in two hospitals in New South Wales sought to explore the feasibility, acceptability and sustainability of a program that provided competency-based implant insertion training for midwives. The study documented training completion, implant insertion numbers and experience, and conducted end of study interviews with midwives and stakeholders. FINDINGS: Twenty-seven midwives undertook training and inserted 265 implants during the study period. Interviews with 13 midwives and 11 stakeholders concluded the program to be feasible and acceptable with midwives reporting high satisfaction from their involvement. All interviewees felt that midwives were well placed to insert implants, and reported that challenges around workload and opportunities for practice were generally manageable. It was recognised that sustainability of the program would require supportive policy and regular insertion opportunities. CONCLUSIONS: Midwives successfully upskilled in implant insertions and there was widespread support for the program with expectations it would be sustained. Provision of contraceptive information and implant insertion by midwives in the immediate postpartum period is likely to increase contraceptive choice and access for women and contribute to reducing rapid repeat pregnancies.

Breastfeeding patterns and effects of minimal supplementation on breastfeeding exclusivity and duration in term infants: A prospective sub-study of a randomised controlled trial.

AIM: Despite international recommendations, less than one-third of Australian women exclusively breastfeed for 6 months. The aims of this study were to prospectively determine rates and factors associated with the type and duration of breastfeeding in the first year and examine the effect of minimal supplementation. METHODS: We conducted a sub-study of a randomised controlled trial in Sydney, Australia, which included 635 women with uncomplicated term births who intended to breastfeed. Data were collected daily for 56 days, and then at 2, 6 and 12 months post-partum. RESULTS: Breastfeeding outcomes were evaluated for 553 (87%), 480 (76%) and 392 (62%) women at 2, 6 and 12 months. Exclusive breastfeeding was 81% at 2 months and 8% at 6 months. Partial breastfeeding was 75% at 6 months and 54% at 12 months. Factors associated with breastfeeding cessation included caesarean birth, low milk supply, problems latching, increased time to breastfeed, use of formula >7 days in the first 2 months, return to work and early introduction of solids. Breast pain in the first week was associated with a 10% decrease in exclusive breastfeeding. Cracked nipples and no previous breastfeeding experience were associated with supplementation of ≤7 days but had no effect on long-term breastfeeding duration. CONCLUSIONS: Exclusive breastfeeding declined significantly between 2 and 6 months post-partum. Early intervention and education to prolong breastfeeding duration should include strategies to manage breast pain and nipple damage to minimise prolonged supplementation. Consistent guidelines about introduction of complementary foods, improved maternity leave and workplace incentives could be effective in prolonging breastfeeding.

Persistent occiput posterior position outcomes following manual rotation: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Persistent occiput posterior position in labor is associated with adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes. Prophylactic manual rotation from the occiput posterior position to the occiput anterior position in the second stage of labor is considered a safe and easy to perform procedure that in observational studies has shown promise as a method for preventing operative deliveries. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine the efficacy of prophylactic manual rotation in the management of occiput posterior position for preventing operative delivery. The hypothesis was that among women who are at least 37 weeks pregnant and whose baby is in the occiput posterior position early in the second stage of labor, manual rotation will reduce the rate of operative delivery compared with the "sham" rotation. STUDY DESIGN: A double-blinded, parallel, superiority, multicenter, randomized controlled clinical trial in 4 tertiary hospitals was conducted in Australia. A total of 254 nulliparous and parous women with a term pregnancy and a baby in the occiput posterior position in the second stage of labor were randomly assigned to receive either a prophylactic manual rotation (n=127) or a sham rotation (n=127). The primary outcome was operative delivery (cesarean, forceps, or vacuum delivery). Secondary outcomes were cesarean delivery, combined maternal mortality and serious morbidity, and combined perinatal mortality and serious morbidity. Analysis was by intention to treat. Proportions were compared using chi-square tests adjusted for stratification variables using the Mantel-Haenszel method or the Fisher exact test. Planned subgroup analyses by operator experience and by manual rotation technique (digital or whole-hand rotation) were performed. RESULTS: Operative delivery occurred in 79 of 127 women (62%) assigned to prophylactic manual rotation and 90 of 127 women (71%) assigned to sham rotation (common risk difference, 12; 95% confidence interval, -1.7 to 26; P=.09). Among more experienced operators or investigators, operative delivery occurred in 46 of 74 women (62%) assigned to manual rotation and 52 of 71 women (73%) assigned to a sham rotation (common risk difference, 18; 95% confidence interval, -0.5 to 36; P=.07). Cesarean delivery occurred in 22 of 127 women (17%) in both groups. Instrumental delivery (forceps or vacuum) occurred in 57 of 127 women (45%) assigned to prophylactic manual rotation and 68 of 127 women (54%) assigned to sham rotation (common risk difference, 10; 95% confidence interval, -3.1 to 22; P=.14). There was no significant difference in the combined maternal and perinatal outcomes. CONCLUSION: Prophylactic manual rotation did not result in a reduction in the rate of operative delivery. Given manual rotation was associated with a nonsignificant reduction in operative delivery, more randomized trials are needed, as our trial might have been underpowered. In addition, further research is required to further explore the potential impact of operator or investigator experience.

Contraception provision in the postpartum period: Knowledge, views and practices of midwives.

BACKGROUND: Women are susceptible to unintended pregnancies in the first year after giving birth, particularly as consideration of contraception may be a low priority during this time. Discussing and providing contraception before women leave hospital after giving birth may prevent rapid repeat pregnancy and its associated risks. Midwives are well placed to assist with contraceptive decision-making and provision; however, this is not routinely undertaken by midwives in the Australian hospital setting and little is known regarding their views and experiences in relation to contraception. METHODS: An anonymous survey was conducted with midwives at two urban hospitals in New South Wales to better understand their contraceptive knowledge, views and practices regarding midwifery-led contraception provision in the postpartum period. FINDINGS: The survey was completed by 128 midwives. Most agreed that information about contraception provided in the postpartum period is valuable to women, although their knowledge about different methods was variable. The majority (88%) believed that midwives have a role in providing contraceptive information, and 79% reported currently providing contraceptive counselling. However, only 14% had received formal training in this area. CONCLUSION: Findings demonstrate that most midwives provide some contraception information and believe this is an important part of a midwife's role. Yet most have not undertaken formal training in contraception. Additional research is needed to explore the content and quality of midwives' contraception discussions with women. Training midwives in contraceptive counselling would ensure women receive accurate information about available options. Upskilling midwives in contraception provision may increase postpartum uptake and reduce rapid repeat pregnancies.

A survey of obstetricians' attitudes to induction of labour at 39 weeks gestation with the intention of reducing caesarean section rates.

BACKGROUND: Induction of labour (IOL) and caesarean section (CS) rates continue to increase in Australia, New Zealand and globally. There is evidence that CS rates are decreased in the context of medically indicated and elective IOL; therefore, the emerging concept of using IOL as means of preventing CS warrants investigation. AIMS: To assess obstetricians' opinions of elective IOL at 39 weeks gestation, its feasibility, generalisability and utility as a means of preventing CS in Australia and New Zealand. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A de-identified cross-sectional survey was distributed electronically to all Fellows and trainees of The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RANZCOG). The survey was voluntary and distributed with the approval of the RANZCOG Continuing Education Committee. The survey addressed opinions relating to rates of and indications for IOL, the perceived validity of those indications and explored the acceptability of using a screening tool to predict women at increased risk of intra-partum CS and tailoring obstetric management to include the option of IOL at 39 weeks gestation. RESULTS: The overall response rate was 34% (492/1423) (including trainees) and the response rate was 53% (394/750) for currently practising obstetricians. The majority (90%) of responders agreed on medical and clinical indications for IOL. There was no consensus on the validity of IOL if a woman were at apparent high risk of intra-partum CS; however, 81% (360/443) of clinicians would be interested in a tool that could predict those women at risk. CONCLUSIONS: There is heterogeneity of obstetrician's beliefs on using IOL at 39 weeks as a mechanism to reduce the CS rate.

Cesarean delivery: Trend in indications over three decades within a major city hospital network.

INTRODUCTION: The cesarean delivery rate has been increasing globally in recent decades. The reasons for this are complex and subject to ongoing debate. Investigation of the indications for cesarean delivery and how these have changed over an extended period of time could provide insight into the reasons for changing obstetric practice. Our objective was to explore contributing factors to the increasing rate of cesarean delivery by examining the incidence of and indications for cesarean delivery over the past three decades at our institutions. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective observational study of all cesarean deliveries, from 24 weeks' gestational age onwards, within an inner-city hospital network in Sydney, Australia, between August 1989 and December 2016. The primary outcome measures were the rates of and indications for emergency and planned cesarean delivery. We also examined our data within the Robson 10-Group Classification system. RESULTS: There were 147 722 births over the study period, with 37 309 cesarean deliveries for an overall rate of 25.3%. The rate of cesarean delivery increased from 18.7% in 1989-1994 (8.7% emergency, 10% planned) to 30.4% in 2010-2016 (11.4% emergency, 19% planned). Emergency cesarean delivery for slow progress increased from 3.4% to 5.5% of all births (a relative increase of 62%) and other emergency cesareans mainly performed for suspected intrapartum fetal compromise increased from 5.2% to 5.6% (a relative increase of 8%). Previous uterine surgery (predominantly cesarean section) was the largest contributor to the increase in planned procedures from 3.8% to 9.0% of all births, and 29% of all cesarean deliveries. Primary cesarean delivery for planned antenatal fetal indications, previous pregnancy problems, multiple gestation and maternal choice all increased substantially in combined rate from 0.7% to 4.9%. Cesarean rates in Robson groups 6, 7 and 8 (term breech and multiple gestations) increased most over time. CONCLUSIONS: The increased rate of cesarean delivery is mainly attributable to a greater number of procedures performed for slow progress in labor, breech presentation or repeat cesarean section.

The association between induction of labour at 38 to 39 weeks pregnancy and indication for caesarean delivery: An observational study.

BACKGROUND: Induction of labour is associated with a reduction in caesarean delivery, but the mechanism of action and which groups of women might benefit remain unknown. AIMS: To assess the association between induction of labour at 38-39 weeks pregnancy, and caesarean delivery: (i) overall; (ii) for slow progress in labour; and (iii) for suspected fetal compromise. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Retrospective observational study in two Sydney hospitals from 2009 to 2016, among nulliparous women with induction of labour at 38 or 39 completed weeks pregnancy and a singleton, cephalic presenting fetus. The comparator was all planned vaginal births beyond 39(+1/7) weeks, whether or not labour was induced. Binary and multinomial multiple logistic regressions adjusting for multiple confounders were performed. RESULTS: There were 2388 and 15 259 women in the study and comparison groups respectively. Induction of labour was associated with caesarean delivery overall only for women <25 years of age (adjusted odds ratio 1.63; 95% CI 1.17-2.27) and was not associated with caesarean delivery for slow progress. Induction of labour was positively associated with increased caesarean delivery for suspected fetal compromise among young women (<30 years), with the association weakening as maternal age increased. The association between induction of labour and caesarean delivery was different for slow progress compared with suspected compromise (P = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: Induction of labour has different effects on the likelihood of caesarean delivery for slow progress and for suspected fetal compromise. Women <30 years of age are at higher risk of caesarean delivery for suspected fetal compromise, potentially due to uterine hyperstimulation.

Outcomes of induction of labour in nulliparous women at 38 to 39 weeks pregnancy by clinical indication: An observational study.

BACKGROUND: Knowledge of the outcomes of induction of labour for different indications is sparse. AIMS: To describe the mode of birth and other outcomes for nulliparous women induced at 38-39 weeks gestational age by indication for induction of labour. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This was a retrospective observational study in a tertiary referral hospital, and a metropolitan teaching hospital in Sydney. The study population was nulliparous women with induction of labour at 38 or 39 completed weeks of pregnancy and a singleton, cephalic presenting baby planning a vaginal birth, from 2009 to 2016. The indication for induction of labour was classified into 12 groups. Mode of birth and other maternal and perinatal outcomes were described in each group, for women who spontaneously laboured at 38 or 39 weeks, and for women who gave birth from 40 completed weeks onward. The main outcome measure was mode of birth. RESULTS: There were 3330 women with induction of labour at 38 or 39 weeks gestation. Rates of vaginal birth varied widely, ranging from 54% when the indication for induction was suspected large fetus, to 82% when the indication was suspected fetal compromise, and was 74% overall. Indications for caesarean delivery also varied by indication for induction. Among women giving birth ≥40 weeks gestational age, 75% had a vaginal birth. CONCLUSIONS: In nulliparous women, rates of vaginal birth following induction of labour at 38 or 39 weeks gestation vary widely according to the indication for induction. These data are useful for antenatal counselling.

Is sonographically measured cervical length at 37 weeks of gestation associated with intrapartum cesarean section? A prospective cohort study.

INTRODUCTION: Cesarean section rates continue to increase globally. Prediction of intrapartum cesarean section could lead to preventive measures. Our aim was to assess the association between sonographically measured cervical length at 37 weeks of gestation and cesarean section among women planning a vaginal birth. The population was women with a low-risk pregnancy or with gestational diabetes. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This was a prospective cohort study conducted in a tertiary referral hospital in Sydney, Australia. In all, 212 women with a low-risk pregnancy or with gestational diabetes were recruited including 158 nulliparous and 54 parous women. Maternal demographic, clinical and ultrasound characteristics were collected at 37 weeks of gestation. Semi-Bayesian logistic regression and Markov chain Monte Carlo simulation were used to assess the relation between cervical length and cesarean section in labor. RESULTS: Rates of cesarean section were 5% (2/55) for cervical length ≤20 mm, 17% (17/101) for cervical length 20-32 mm, and 27% (13/56) for cervical length >32 mm. These rates were 4, 22 and 33%, respectively, in nulliparous women. In the semi-Bayesian analysis, the odds ratio for cesarean section was 6.2 (95% confidence interval 2.2-43) for cervical length 20-32 mm and 10 (95% confidence interval 4.8-74) for cervical length >32 mm compared with the lowest quartile of cervical length, after adjusting for maternal age, parity, height, prepregnancy body mass index, gestational diabetes, induction of labor, neonatal sex and birthweight centile. CONCLUSIONS: Cervical length at 37 weeks of gestation is associated with intrapartum cesarean section.