Biomechanical Evaluation of a Modified Internal Brace Construct for the Treatment of Ulnar Collateral Ligament Injuries.

BACKGROUND: Ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) repair augmented with the "internal brace" construct for the management of acute UCL injuries has recently garnered increasing interest from the sports medicine community. One concern with this technique is excessive bone loss at the sublime tubercle, should revision UCL reconstruction be required. In an effort to preserve the bony architecture of the sublime tubercle, an alternative internal brace construct is proposed and biomechanically compared with the gold standard UCL reconstruction. HYPOTHESIS: The internal brace repair construct will restore valgus laxity and rotation to its native state and demonstrate comparable load-to-failure characteristics with the 3-strand reconstruction technique. STUDY DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study. METHODS: For this study, 8 matched pairs of fresh-frozen cadaveric elbows were randomized to undergo either UCL reconstruction with the 3-ply docking technique or UCL repair with a novel internal brace construct focused on augmenting the posterior band of the anterior bundle of the ligament (modified repair-IB technique). Valgus laxity and rotation measurements were quantified through use of a MicroScribe 3DLX digitizer at various flexion angles of the native ligament, transected ligament, and repaired or reconstructed ligament. Laxity testing was performed from maximum extension to 120° of flexion. Each specimen was then loaded to failure, and the method of failure was recorded. RESULTS: Valgus laxity was restored to the intact state at all degrees of elbow flexion with the modified repair-IB technique, and rotation was restored to the intact state at both full extension and 30°. In the reconstruction group, valgus laxity was not restored to the intact state at either full extension or 30° of flexion (P < .001 and P = .004, respectively). Laxity was restored at 60° of flexion, but the elbow was overconstrained at 90° and 120° of flexion (P = .027 and P = .003, respectively). In load-to-failure testing, the reconstruction group demonstrated significantly greater yield torque (19.1 vs 9.0 N·m; P < .005), yield angle (10.2° vs 5.4°; P = .007), and ultimate torque (23.9 vs 17.6 N·m; P = .039). CONCLUSION: UCL repair with posterior band internal bracing was able to restore valgus laxity and rotation to the native state. The construct exhibited lower load-to-failure characteristics when compared with the reconstruction technique. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: In selected patients with acute, avulsion-type UCL injuries, ligament repair with posterior band internal bracing is a viable alternative surgical option that, by preserving bone at the sublime tubercle, may decrease the complexity of future revision procedures.

Ulnar Collateral Ligament Repair With Suture Bridge Augmentation.

The gold standard for management of elbow ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) injuries in elite athletes is reconstruction of the UCL with a tendon graft. Over the past several years, UCL repair for acute tears, as well as partial tears, in young athletes has gained increasing popularity, with studies reporting good outcomes and high rates of return to sports. Additionally, there is increased interest in ligament augmentation using the InternalBrace concept. A recent technique paper describes a direct repair of the UCL augmented with a spanning suture bridge. Although clinical outcomes for this method are promising, one possible concern when using this technique is bone loss at the ulnar origin of the UCL should revision reconstruction be required. We propose an alternative augmentation method that allows for stress shielding of the healing native ligament while minimizing bone compromise in the face of UCL reconstruction at a later time point.

The Development and Validation of a Subjective Assessment Tool for the Hip in the Athletic Population.

BACKGROUND: No validated functional assessments are available that are designed specifically to evaluate the performance and function of the athletic hip. Subsections of some validated outcome assessments address recreation, but a full assessment dedicated to athletic hip function does not exist. Current hip scoring systems may not be sensitive to subtle changes in performance and function in an athletic, younger population. HYPOTHESIS: The patient-athlete subjective scoring system developed in this study will be validated, reliable, and responsive in the evaluation of hip function in the athlete. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: Based on the results of a pilot questionnaire administered to 18 athletic individuals, a final 10-item questionnaire was developed. Two hundred fifty competitive athletes from multiple sports completed the final questionnaire and 3 previously validated hip outcome assessments. Each athlete was self-assigned to 1 of 3 injury categories: (1) playing without hip/groin trouble; (2) playing, but with hip/groin trouble; and (3) not playing due to hip/groin trouble. The injury categories contained 196, 40, and 14 athletes, respectively. Correlations between the assessment scores and injury categories were measured. Responsiveness testing was performed in an additional group of 24 injured athletes, and their scores before and after intervention were compared. RESULTS: The Kerlan-Jobe Orthopaedic Clinic (KJOC) Athletic Hip Score showed high correlation with the modified Harris Hip Score, the Nonarthritic Hip Score, and the International Hip Outcome Tool. The new score stratified athletes by injury category, demonstrated responsiveness and accuracy, and varied appropriately with improvements in injury category after treatment of injuries. CONCLUSION: The new KJOC Athletic Hip Score is valid, reliable, and responsive for evaluation of the hip in an athletic population. The results support its use for the functional assessment of the hip in future studies.

Return to Golfing Activity After Joint Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Many patients who are considering total joint arthroplasty, including hip, knee, and shoulder replacement, are concerned with their likelihood of returning to golf postoperatively as well as the effect that surgery will have on their game. PURPOSE: To review the existing literature on patients who have undergone major joint arthroplasty (hip, knee, and shoulder), to examine the effects of surgery on performance in golf, and to provide surgeon recommendations as related to participation in golf after surgery. A brief review of the history and biomechanics of the golf swing is also provided. STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review. METHODS: We performed a systematic review of the literature in the online Medline database, evaluating articles that contained the terms "golf" and "arthroplasty." Additionally, a web-based search evaluating clinical practice recommendations after joint arthroplasty was performed. The research was reviewed, and objective and anecdotal guidelines were formulated. RESULTS: Total joint arthroplasty provided an improvement in pain during golfing activity, and most patients were able to return to sport with variable improvements in sport-specific outcomes. CONCLUSION: In counseling patients regarding the return to golf after joint arthroplasty, it is our opinion, on the basis of our experience and those reported from others in the literature, that golfers undergoing total hip, knee, and shoulder arthroplasty can safely return to sport.

Epidemiology of Operative Procedures in an NCAA Division I Football Team Over 10 Seasons.

BACKGROUND: Injury rates are high for collegiate football players. Few studies have evaluated the epidemiology of surgical procedures in National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) Division I collegiate football players. PURPOSE: To determine the most common surgical procedures performed in collegiate football players over a 10-year period. STUDY DESIGN: Descriptive epidemiological study. METHODS: From the 2004-2005 season through the 2013-2014 season, all surgical procedures performed on athletes from a single NCAA Division I college football team during athletic participation were reviewed. Surgeries were categorized by anatomic location, and operative reports were used to obtain further surgical details. Data collected over this 10-season span included type of injury, primary procedures, reoperations, and cause of reoperation, all categorized by specific anatomic locations and position played. RESULTS: From the 2004-2005 through the 2013-2014 seasons, 254 operations were performed on 207 players, averaging 25.4 surgical procedures per year. The majority of surgeries performed were orthopaedic procedures (92.1%, n = 234). However, there were multiple nonorthopaedic procedures (7.9%, n = 20). The most common procedure performed was arthroscopic shoulder labral repair (12.2%, n = 31). Partial meniscectomy (11.8%, n = 30), arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (9.4% n = 24), and arthroscopic hip labral repair (5.9% n = 15) were the other commonly performed procedures. There were a total of 29 reoperations performed; thus, 12.9% of primary procedures had a reoperation. The most common revision procedure was a revision open reduction internal fixation of stress fractures in the foot as a result of a symptomatic nonunion (33.33%, n = 4) and revision ACL reconstruction (12.5%, n = 3). By position, relative to the number of athletes at each position, linebackers (30.5%) and defensive linemen (29.1%) were the most likely to undergo surgery while kickers (6%) were the least likely. CONCLUSION: In NCAA Division I college football players, the most commonly performed surgeries conducted for injuries were orthopaedic in nature. Of these, arthroscopic shoulder labral repair was the most common, followed closely by partial meniscectomy. Nonorthopaedic procedures nonetheless accounted for a sizable portion of surgical volume. Familiarity with this injury and surgical spectrum is of utmost importance for the team physician treating these high-level contact athletes.