Association of single nucleotide polymorphisms in the IRF6 gene with nonsyndromic cleft lip with or without cleft palate in Kinh Vietnamese patients.

BACKGROUND: The interferon regulatory factor 6 (IRF6) gene, which causes Van der Woude syndrome, is associated with nonsyndromic cleft lip with or without cleft palate (NSCL/P). Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the IRF6 gene were identified as susceptibility indicators of this defect in several populations. To further evaluate its role in this birth defect, we conducted this study with the aim of identifying allele frequencies, genotype frequencies, and associations of 5 SNPs (rs2235373, rs2235371, rs2235375, rs2013162, and rs2236907) in the IRF6 gene with NSCL/P in Kinh Vietnamese patients. METHODS: A total of 132 patients with NSCL/P and 132 healthy individuals were included in our study group. Direct sequencing was performed to genotype the tag SNPs. Genetic models were used to compare genotype and allele frequencies between the case and control groups. RESULTS: In the recessive model, the genotypes C/C of rs2236907, C/C of rs2013162, G/G of rs2235375, and A/A of rs2235373 were associated with an increased risk of NSCL/P, whereas there was no clear association between rs2235371 and the malformation in any genetic model. When subgroup analysis was performed, we observed a similar risk trend in the cleft lip and palate, cleft palate only and cleft lip only phenotypes. In haplotype analysis, haplotype models of 5 tag SNPs were associated with increased risks of this defect in all phenotypic models (ORGCGCC/CCAA = 23.64, 95% CI 12.28-45.49, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: These findings point to a considerable contribution of rs2236907, rs2013162, rs2235373, and rs2235375 to the NSCL/P defect in Kinh Vietnamese individuals.

Association of Single-Nucleotide Polymorphisms of MAFB Gene with Nonsyndromic Cleft Lip with or without Cleft Palate in Kinh Vietnamese Patients.

Background Cleft lip with or without palate (CL/P) is the most common orofacial birth defect. Single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in MAFB gene (V-Maf avian musculoaponeurotic fibrosarcoma oncogene homolog B) were identified as susceptible to this defect in a genome-wide association study. To further evaluate its role in this birth defect, we conducted this study with the aim of identifying allele frequencies, genotype frequencies, and association of SNPs rs13041247, rs6065259, and rs6072081 of MAFB gene with nonsyndromic cleft lip/palate (NCL/P) in Kinh Vietnamese patients. Methods We performed case-control study involved 79 patients with NCL/P and 77 healthy controls. DNAs were extracted from participants' saliva and tetra-amplification refractory mutation system polymerase chain reaction (tetra-ARMS PCR) was used for genotyping SNPs. Results SNPs of MAFB gene were genotyped using the Tetra-ARMS PCR method. We found that genotype CT of rs13041247 was associated with an increased risk of NCL/P in Kinh Vietnamese (odds ratio TCTT [OR TC/TT ] = 1.63, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.83-3.19, p = 0.17). The G allele genotypes of SNP rs6072081 increase high risk for the malformation, statistically significant result (OR GG/AA = 7.06, 95% CI = 2.13-23.42, p < 0.001). There is no clear association between rs6065259 and CL/P (OR AA/GG = 0.75, 95% CI = 0.22-2.50, p = 0.32; OR AG/GG = 1.53, 95% CI = 0.79-2.97, p = 0.32). When the patients were divided into the phenotypic subgroups, there was a similar significant trend between the patients and controls for all SNPs. Conclusions Our study provides further evidence of role of MAFB gene variations with NCL/P defect in Kinh Vietnamese.

A Novel Approach to the Treatment of Le Fort Fractures Using Internal Fixation to Achieve Mandibulomaxillary Fixation.

BACKGROUND: We aimed to determine the minimum effective period of mandibulomaxillary fixation after the inadequate internal fixation of Le Fort I or Le Fort II fracture. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate the stability of the skeleton after the treatment of Le Fort I or Le Fort II fractures by measuring bite forces and to determine the minimum time required for effective mandibulomaxillary fixation following treatment with internal fixation and mandibulomaxillary fixation. METHOD: A prospective study was performed to examine the treatment of Le Fort I or Le Fort II fracture in the Department of Maxillofacial Surgery at the National Hospital of Odonto-Stomatology in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam. A total of 31 patients were included, with up to 1 month of follow-up after discharge from the hospital. Midface bone stability and the mandibulomaxillary fixation time were evaluated using bite force criteria after 1, 2, and 4 weeks. RESULTS: Midface bone stability values 1, 2, and 4 weeks after treatment were 87.1%, 100%, and 100%, respectively. After 1 week, 87.1% of patients achieved intermaxillary fixation, and 96.3% of these patients were treated with at least three rigid plates. The remaining 12.9% of patients achieved fixation after 2 weeks, and all of these patients were fixed only at zygomaticomaxillary sutures (p < 0.05). Bite forces increased significantly at 2 weeks compared with 1 week and at 4 weeks compared with 2 weeks (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: When treated using only rigid fixation, through the placement of plates and screws at zygomaticomaxillary buttresses, patients with Le Fort I and Le Fort II fractures can achieve mandibulomaxillary fixation after 2 weeks. For Le Fort I fractures, rigid fixation using plates and screws at zygomaticomaxillary buttresses and canine buttress at three positions can achieve mandibulomaxillary fixation after only 1 week (p = 0.0001).

Evaluation of Bite Force After Treatment of Le Fort Fractures by Internal Fixation and Mandibulomaxillary Fixation.

OBJECTIVES: Evaluation of bite force one, two, and four weeks after discharge following treatment of Le Fort I and/or Le Fort II fracture by rigid fixation and mandibulomaxillary fixation. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate bite force following treatment of Le Fort I and/or Le Fort II fractures by rigid fixation and mandibulomaxillary fixation at one, two, and four weeks after discharge. This provides valuable results to guide the development of a treatment protocol for Le Fort fractures. METHOD: This was a prospective study including 31 patients who underwent followup examination three times after being discharged from hospital. The examination evaluated bite force using a bite force meter in the right molar, left molar, and incisor regions. RESULTS: One week after discharge, bite forces in the right molar, left molar, and incisor regions were 94.29 ± 58.80 N, 95.42 ± 57.34 N, and 39,94 ± 30,29 N, respectively. Two weeks after discharge, bite forces in the right molar, left molar, and incisor regions were 153.84 ± 89.14 N, 153.00 ± 78.55 N, and 65,9 ± 43.89 N, respectively. Four weeks after discharge, bite forces in the right molar, left molar, and incisor regions were 279.77 ± 95.46 N, 285.00 ± 90,47 N, and 123.42 ± 54.04 N, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Bite forces in the right molar, left molar, and incisor regions were significantly increased one week, two weeks, and four weeks after discharge. Bite force may be a helpful parameter to confirm the stability of the midface bone after treatment of Le Fort fractures.

The effect of a nano-filled resin coating on the 3-year clinical performance of a conventional high-viscosity glass-ionomer cement.

OBJECTIVES: The main aim of the study was to compare the clinical performance of the conventional high-powder/liquid ratio glass-ionomer cement (GIC) Fuji IX GP Extra (F IX), Fuji IX GP Extra with a low-viscosity nano-filled resin coating, G-Coat Plus (F IX+GCP), and a resin composite, Solare (S), as a comparison material. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Moderate-depth occlusal cavities in the first permanent molars of 91 11-12-year-old children (1-4 restorations per child) were restored with either F IX (87 restorations), F IX+GCP (84 restorations) or S (83 restorations). Direct clinical assessment, photographic assessment and assessment of stone casts of the restorations were carried out at 6 months, 1 year, 2 years and 3 years. RESULTS: The colour match with the tooth of the GIC restorations improved over the 3 years of the study. Marginal staining and marginal adaptation were minimal for all restorations; three restorations exhibited secondary caries at 3 years. From the assessment of the casts, at 2 years, there was significantly less wear of the F IX GP Extra+GCP restorations than the F IX GP Extra restorations (P < 0.005). At 3 years, approximately 37 % of F IX GP Extra restorations showed wear slightly more than the adjacent enamel, compared to 28 % of F IX GP Extra+GCP restorations and 21 % of Solare restorations. Although this was not statistically significant, there was a trend that GCP can protect F IX GP Extra against wear. CONCLUSION: Although both Fuji IX GP Extra and Fuji IX GP Extra with G-Coat Plus showed acceptable clinical performance in occlusal cavities in children, the application of G-Coat Plus gave some protection against wear. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The application of G-Coat Plus to Fuji IX GP Extra glass-ionomer cement may be beneficial in reducing wear in occlusal cavities.