Validation study of the Self-Assessment Goal Achievement (SAGA) questionnaire for lower urinary tract symptoms.

BACKGROUND: Patients' treatment goals for overactive bladder (OAB) and other lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) may not be aligned with their healthcare provider's goals. Successful management of OAB symptoms is improved by individualised treatment plans with attainable treatment goals. Goal attainment setting may facilitate patient-provider interaction and the development of a personalised treatment plan based on realistic, individual goals, thereby increasing patient satisfaction and therapeutic outcomes. The purpose of this study was to validate the utility of the Self-Assessment Goal Achievement (SAGA) questionnaire for LUTS in helping patients identify and achieve realistic treatment goals. METHODS: The 2-module SAGA questionnaire consists of nine prespecified (fixed) items and five open-ended items for goal identification and ranking (baseline module) and goal achievement rating (follow-up module). Adult patients in the United States (n = 104) seeking treatment for LUTS, including symptoms of OAB, completed the SAGA baseline module, micturition diary, other patient-reported outcome measures (PROs), and discussed their urinary goals with a clinician at baseline. The SAGA follow-up module was completed 2-4 months later. SAGA was validated based on analyses of face, concurrent, known-groups, and convergent validity and item distribution. RESULTS: Among the nine fixed goals of SAGA, four were ranked as very important by > 50% of patients (i.e. reduce night-time frequency, daytime frequency, urine leakage, urgency). Most patients did not change the importance level of their goals after discussion with their healthcare provider. Pearson correlations between SAGA, diary variables and PRO scores were generally of low to moderate strength. The global mean (SD) follow-up SAGA T-score was 32.54 (12.54), indicating that overall goal attainment was not achieved after 3 months. The goal attainment score was significantly different between groups differing in symptom severity, health-related quality of life, bladder control and continence status. CONCLUSIONS: The results support the validity of SAGA as a measure of patients' goals and goal achievement for the treatment of LUTS, including symptoms of OAB. SAGA may improve healthcare provider-patient interactions and treatment outcomes in clinical practice.

Assessing fibromyalgia-related fatigue: content validity and psychometric performance of the Fatigue Visual Analog Scale in adult patients with fibromyalgia.

OBJECTIVES: To document 1) the content validity and 2) measure improvements in fatigue, using the Fatigue Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) assessment tool in patients with fibromyalgia. METHODS: The relevance and comprehensiveness of the Fatigue VAS were tested through a qualitative analysis of 20 subjects' verbatim transcripts from semi-structured qualitative interviews. Data from two randomised, controller trials in fibromyalgia (n=1121) were used to conduct correlation analyses with the Fatigue and Tiredness items from the Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ) and the Short Form-36 Vitality scale. Known-groups and cross classification analyses were conducted to demonstrate the ability to measure improvement in fatigue using the Fatigue VAS. RESULTS: All subjects spontaneously reported that fatigue was an important symptom to capture in fibromyalgia. The Fatigue VAS was well understood by most subjects (n=18/20). High correlations (Pearson r>0.75) and good agreement (k>0.66) were found between the Fatigue VAS and the FIQ tiredness items no. 16 and 17 and SF-36™ Vitality scale. In both clinical trials there was a substantial separation of approximately 20 points on the mean change in the Fatigue VAS score between responders (>30% improvement in pain VAS) and non-responders. CONCLUSIONS: Previous studies have confirmed that fatigue is a major component of the fibromyalgia experience. This current study reports that fibromyalgia patients spontaneously rated fatigue as a highly significant feature of their illness, and supports the use of the Fatigue VAS as a valid questionnaire in fibromyalgia clinical trials.

Assessing sleep in fibromyalgia: investigation of an alternative scoring method for the Jenkins Sleep Scale based on data from randomized controlled studies.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the validity of a rescored version of the Jenkins Sleep Scale (JSS) to assess the extent of possible bias of a 4-week recall period in assessing sleep in patients with fibromyalgia. METHODS: A rescoring algorithm of the JSS was developed. The psychometric properties of the rescored JSS were examined using blinded, observed data from a Phase 2 trial (n=195) in subjects with fibromyalgia. In addition, data from two Phase 3, randomised, controlled trials (n=1,121) in subjects with fibromyalgia were used to further validate the rescored JSS by conducting correlation analyses with other assessments expected to correlate with sleep. These included fatigue and tiredness items from the Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ), the Functional Outcomes of Sleep Questionnaire (FOSQ), and the Short Form-36 (SF-36™) Vitality scale. RESULTS: Construct validity of the rescored JSS was found to be acceptable, with an internal consistency reliability of α=0.70. Test-retest reliability on stable subjects, defined using the FIQ total score, was also acceptable (ICC=0.70). Moderate to high correlations (Pearson r>0.66) were found with two FIQ items, addressing fatigue and non-restorative sleep, and the SF-36™ Vitality scale; correlations with the original JSS were similar. Both JSS versions were found to be responsive (p<0.0001), and the rescored version accounted for 90% of the variance captured in the original version. CONCLUSIONS: These results showed the rescored JSS performed similarly to the original scale, suggesting the original scale's 4-week recall period did not introduce substantial bias in capturing the experience of fibromyalgia-related sleep disturbances.