Moleculargenetic and in Addition Partly Discrepant Infection Serological Malaria Testing in Two Blood Donors.

Introduction: According to the guidelines (GL) valid in Germany, persons born or raised in a malaria-endemic area or had continuously stayed in a malaria-endemic area for more than 6 months may only be admitted donating blood if, among other things, validated and quality-assured laboratory diagnostics show that there is no evidence of infectivity. In a statement of the Working Group "Blood" of the Federal Ministry of Health (WGB), a reduction of the deferral period from 4 to 3 years and an antibody test after the deferral period are recommended. Methods: In accordance with the GL, nucleic acid testing (NAT) by means of PCR is carried out at our institution after a retention period of 4 years. In addition to the validated molecular biological testing, an infection serological examination was performed. Case Presentation: In the present cases, Plasmodia genome was detected in the respective single PCR in two blood donors originating from malaria-endemic areas after the expiry of the deferral period. However, one donor tested negative for antibodies against Plasmodia. Discussion/Conclusion: This observation is discussed in the context of a recommendation of the WGB. The question is addressed whether PCR testing is dispensable or whether a combination of infection serological testing and NAT should be favored.

Implementation of an HIV-1 Triple-Target NAT Assay in the Routine Screening at Three German Red Cross Blood Centres.

BACKGROUND: Blood product safety was significantly improved by the introduction of NAT testing in the late 1990s, resulting in a strong decrease of transfusion-transmitted infections (TTIs). Due to the occurrence of HIV-1 NAT test failures as a consequence of mismatch mutations in the amplicon regions of mono-target NAT assays, the Paul Ehrlich Institute mandated the implementation of multi-target NAT assays for HIV-1 in 2014. Commercial suppliers mostly developed dual-target NAT assays, with only one implementing a triple-target NAT assay. METHODS: The HIV-1 triple-target NAT assay v3 (GFE Blut) was tested on mutated specimens and synthetic DNA bearing mutations that resulted in sample underquantification or false-negative test results. In addition, data from 2 years routine testing at three German Red Cross Blood centres were analysed. RESULTS: The HIV-1 triple-target PCR could compensate for all mutations tested and could compensate the loss of one amplicon without a significant loss of sensitivity. Data from 2 years routine testing showed a solid performance. CONCLUSION: The HIV-1 triple-target v3 assay (GFE Blut) can compensate mutations in target sequences better than a dual-target assay and is applicable to high-throughput screening, thus increasing blood product safety.

How safe is safe: new human immunodeficiency virus Type 1 variants missed by nucleic acid testing.

BACKGROUND: Nucleic acid amplification techniques (NAT) in routine blood donor screening considerably reduce the diagnostic window phase period. Nevertheless, several reports of false-negative NAT results were published. Here, four cases of human immunodeficiency virus Type 1 (HIV-1) RNA-positive blood donations that escaped detection by NAT screening are described. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: A total of 2.7 million blood donations were screened for viral infections between January 2010 and October 2012 in our German Red Cross blood donation service. Four plasma specimens with false-negative NAT results were comparatively investigated with 12 CE-marked NAT assays. In two cases of putative HIV-1 variants the target region of the NAT assay was sequenced allowing comparison with the respective primers and probes. RESULTS: Most of the NAT assays used in routine blood donor screening with the 5'-long terminal repeat (LTR) as target region demonstrated deficiencies in detecting the viral variants and the low-viral-carrier donations. Sequence analysis revealed in one case a deletion of 56 nucleotides within the 5'-LTR preventing the binding of the probe accompanied by a neighbored insertion of another 52 nucleotides and several primer mismatches in another case. No false-negative results were obtained for these cases using dual-target assays. The viral load of the remaining two false-negative results was below the NAT's limit of detection. CONCLUSION: HIV-1 is characterized by a high mutation rate and rapid generation of new viral variants. By the use of one target region for HIV-1 NAT assays there is a certain risk of false-negative results. Employing HIV-1 multi- and dual-target assays in routine blood donor screening seems to be a reasonable possibility to minimize this problem.

Multicenter evaluation of a commercial multiplex polymerase chain reaction test for screening plasma donations for parvovirus B19 DNA and hepatitis A virus RNA.

BACKGROUND: Three European laboratories evaluated the TaqScreen DPX test (DPX test), a multiplex nucleic acid test assay for the simultaneous detection and quantitation of parvovirus B19 (B19V) DNA and the detection of hepatitis A virus (HAV) RNA. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: The 95% limit of detection of the test for B19V and HAV was determined using the respective WHO International Standards. The reproducibility of the test was evaluated by testing replicate samples of B19V at log 4.0 and 40 IU/mL and HAV at 5 IU/mL. The accuracy of the DPX test for B19V was evaluated by replicate testing of B19V samples containing log 3.0, log 4.0, and log 5.0 IU/mL. Panels of B19V Genotypes 1, 2, and 3 and HAV genotypes were evaluated. Cross-contamination was evaluated. For comparison of the DPX test and the established tests, the sites tested plasma samples in pools of either 96 or 480 donations. RESULTS: The mean 95% lower limits of detection of the three laboratories for B19V and HAV were 20.30 and 1.85 IU/mL. The test showed good reproducibility with the major part of the variance of the test being attributed to intermediate assay variation. The test showed great accuracy for B19V, especially at log 4.0 IU/mL. Spiking of test pools of 480 donations and manufacturing pools with log 4.0 IU/mL B19 DNA and 4 IU/mL HAV RNA showed that the DPX assay was robust. The test was able to detect the three genotypes of B19V and HAV genotypes. No cross-contamination was seen. Test results of routine samples correlated well with those of the established tests. CONCLUSION: The DPX test is a robust and sensitive test for the detection of B19V and HAV in plasma samples. The quantitative B19V results obtained with the test are accurate, and the test is able to detect all the known genotypes of B19V and HAV and fulfills all the European Pharmacopoeia and Food and Drug Administration requirements for a B19V and HAV test for screening of plasma donations and samples from plasma pools for manufacture.

Blood screening nucleic acid amplification tests for human immunodeficiency virus Type 1 may require two different amplification targets.

BACKGROUND: Five cases of human immunodeficiency virus Type 1 (HIV-1) RNA-positive blood donations are described that escaped detection by three different CE-marked nucleic acid amplification technique (NAT) screening assays. These events were associated with two HIV-1 transmissions to recipients of blood components. The implicated NAT assays are monotarget assays and amplify in different viral genome regions (group-specific antigen or long terminal repeat). Investigations into the cause of the false-negative test results were initiated. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Plasma specimens of the five NAT false-negative cases were comparatively investigated in 12 CE-marked HIV-1 NAT systems of differing design. The relative amplification efficiency for the HIV-1 variant was determined for each assay. Sequencing of the variants in the region targeted by each false-negative NAT assay allowed comparison with the respective primers and probes. RESULTS: Some of the NAT assays designed in a similar way to false-negative monotarget NATs also revealed deficiencies in detecting the viral variants. In each case sequencing of the assay target region in the variants demonstrated mismatches with primers and probes used by the assays. Some dual-target assays showed decreased amplification efficiency, but not false-negative results. CONCLUSION: HIV is characterized by its rapid evolution of new viral variants. The evolution of new sequences is unpredictable; NAT screening assays with a single target region appear to be more vulnerable to sequence variations than dual-target assays. Based on this experience with false-negative tests results by monotarget NAT assays, the Paul-Ehrlich-Institut is considering requesting dual-target NAT assays for HIV-1 blood donation screening in Germany.

Experience of German Red Cross blood donor services with nucleic acid testing: results of screening more than 30 million blood donations for human immunodeficiency virus-1, hepatitis C virus, and hepatitis B virus.

BACKGROUND: The risk of transfusion-transmitted human immunodeficiency virus-1 (HIV-1), hepatitis C virus (HCV), and hepatitis B virus (HBV) infections is predominantly attributable to donations given during the early stage of infection when diagnostic tests may fail. In 1997, nucleic acid amplification technique (NAT)-testing was introduced at the German Red Cross (GRC) blood donor services to reduce this diagnostic window period (WP). STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: A total of 31,524,571 blood donations collected from 1997 through 2005 were screened by minipool NAT, predominantly with pool sizes of 96 donations. These donations cover approximately 80 percent of all the blood collected in Germany during that period. Based on these data, the WP risk in the GRC blood donor population was estimated by using a state-of-the-art mathematic model. RESULTS: During the observation period, 23 HCV, 7 HIV-1, and 43 HBV NAT-only-positive donations were detected. On the basis of these data and estimated pre-NAT infectious WPs, the residual risk per unit transfused was estimated at 1 in 10.88 million for HCV (95% confidence interval [CI], 7.51-19.72 million), 1 in 4.30 million for HIV-1 (95% CI, 2.39-21.37 million), and 1 in 360,000 for HBV (95% CI, 0.19-3.36 million). Based on observed cases of breakthrough infections, the risk of transfusion-related infections may be even lower. CONCLUSION: The risk of a blood recipient becoming infected with HCV, HIV-1, or HBV has reached an extremely low level. Introduction of individual donation testing for HCV and HIV-1 would have a marginal effect on interception of WP donations.

Occurrence of hepatitis A virus genotype III in Germany requires the adaptation of commercially available diagnostic test systems.

BACKGROUND: A blood donation, obtained in 2003 in Germany during the preseroconversion diagnostic window period of a hepatitis A virus (HAV) infection, tested HAV-negative by commercially available HAV reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) detection assays. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: The virus responsible for this infection was identified as HAV genotype IIIA by characterization of the nearly complete genome sequence. RESULTS: Thereby, this HAV variant, which was named strain HMH, was detected in Germany for the first time. Because the commercially available HAV RNA detection systems failed to detect this genotype, a real-time RT-PCR kit was developed that allows quantification and detection of all HAV genotypes. The first nearly full-length nucleotide sequence so far available for HAV genotype IIIA is also provided. CONCLUSION: This case demonstrates that owing to the genetic variability of HAV, constant monitoring and adaptation of the diagnostic nucleic acid assays are required to guarantee the safety of blood and blood products.

Magnetic bead technology in viral RNA and DNA extraction from plasma minipools.

BACKGROUND: Nucleic acid testing (NAT) of pooled plasma samples from individual blood donations for viral nucleic acids has become widely established. Full automation of such sample processing can overcome many of the problems associated with methods used so far. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: In this study an automated extraction method for viral nucleic acids (parvovirus [PAV] B19 DNA, hepatitis B virus [HBV] DNA, and hepatitis A virus [HAV] RNA), starting directly from the minipool sample (n = 96, 9.6 mL), was evaluated. A magnetic separation module I (chemagic, Polymer Laboratories) in combination with the chemagic viral DNA and RNA kit special based on the use of magnetic beads was used for this purpose. More than 144 pools spiked with defined concentrations of reference material and an additional 102 pools negative for the analyte were extracted and amplified. The isolated viral nucleic acids were detected by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). RESULTS: The assays were highly specific and obtained a 95 percent detection limit of 875 IU per mL of pooled single donation for PAV B19, 260 IU per mL for HAV, and 1274 IU per mL for HBV, respectively. The crossing points showed variation coefficients from 1.49 to 2.76 percent. The turnaround time for the whole process was 3 hours. Testing of subpools to determine an infected single donation would be possible with the same general extraction method. A total of 102 unspiked minipools (96 x 100 microL per donation) were analyzed and none tested positive. CONCLUSION: The automated magnetic bead-based extraction in combination with real-time PCR detection can be used to routinely screen blood donations for viremic donors to further increase the safety of blood products. Minipools as well as subpools can be directly processed.