Ventilation rates and health: multidisciplinary review of the scientific literature.

UNLABELLED: The scientific literature through 2005 on the effects of ventilation rates on health in indoor environments has been reviewed by a multidisciplinary group. The group judged 27 papers published in peer-reviewed scientific journals as providing sufficient information on both ventilation rates and health effects to inform the relationship. Consistency was found across multiple investigations and different epidemiologic designs for different populations. Multiple health endpoints show similar relationships with ventilation rate. There is biological plausibility for an association of health outcomes with ventilation rates, although the literature does not provide clear evidence on particular agent(s) for the effects. Higher ventilation rates in offices, up to about 25 l/s per person, are associated with reduced prevalence of sick building syndrome (SBS) symptoms. The limited available data suggest that inflammation, respiratory infections, asthma symptoms and short-term sick leave increase with lower ventilation rates. Home ventilation rates above 0.5 air changes per hour (h(-1)) have been associated with a reduced risk of allergic manifestations among children in a Nordic climate. The need remains for more studies of the relationship between ventilation rates and health, especially in diverse climates, in locations with polluted outdoor air and in buildings other than offices. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: Ventilation with outdoor air plays an important role influencing human exposures to indoor pollutants. This review and assessment indicates that increasing ventilation rates above currently adopted standards and guidelines should result in reduced prevalence of negative health outcomes. Building operators and designers should avoid low ventilation rates unless alternative effective measures, such as source control or air cleaning, are employed to limit indoor pollutant levels.

Attempting to control mite allergens with mechanical ventilation and dehumidification in British houses.

BACKGROUND: Allergen avoidance is of considerable interest in the treatment and even prevention of asthma. Attempts to control house dust mites have included environmental manipulation in homes in an attempt to reduce humidity below a level that favors mite survival. This appears to have some benefit in Scandinavia, but a previous attempt with mechanical ventilation heat pump recovery (MVHR) units in the UK failed to achieve the desired results. OBJECTIVE: We report a study using an additional central dehumidification modification of the MVHR (MVHRcd) in an attempt to reduce allergen levels in houses of asthmatic subjects. METHODS: Ten houses of asthmatic patients allergic to dust mites and 10 architectural control houses were studied. The active houses were fitted with an MVHRcd unit in November/December 1994 and activated in January 1995. The active and control houses were monitored continuously for internal temperature and humidity by using digital sensors in the asthmatic and control bedrooms. Dust samples were collected to determine allergen levels at baseline (January 1994) and 3, 6, 9, and 15 months after switching on the units. RESULTS: The winter seasonal average humidity fell from 50% relative humidity (RH) in control bedrooms to 37% RH in asthmatic bedrooms compared with 72% RH in the ambient air as measured on the intake of the MVHRcd systems. There was no corresponding change in seasonal mean temperature within the houses. Although the temperature and humidity weekly and seasonal means remained below the study target of 45% RH or 7 g/kg absolute humidity at 21 degrees C, there were transient rises in humidity detected by the sensors in the houses with MVHRcd systems. Allergen levels fell both in active and control houses during the study period, but there was no significant advantage gained from the installation of MVHRcd systems. CONCLUSION: The MVHRcd system failed to confer a benefit in terms of mite allergen reduction despite apparently adequate control of temperature and humidity.

Relationship between exhaled nitric oxide and childhood asthma.

The purpose of the study was to determine if exhaled nitric oxide levels in children varied according to their asthmatic and atopic status. Exhaled nitric oxide was measured in a sample of 93 children attending the North West Lung Centre, Manchester, United Kingdom, for the clinical evaluation of a respiratory questionnaire being developed as a screening tool in general practice. The clinical assessment included full lung function, skin prick testing, and exercise challenge. Children were said to be asthmatic either by consensus decision of three independent consultant pediatricians, who reviewed all the clinical results except the nitric oxide measurements, or by positive exercise test. Atopic asthmatic children had higher geometric mean exhaled nitric oxide levels (consensus decision, 12.5 ppb [parts per billion] 95% CI, 8.3 to 18. 8; positive exercise test, 12.2 ppb 95% CI, 7.6 to 19.7) than did nonatopic asthmatic children (3.2 ppb 95% CI, 2.3 to 4.6; 3.2 ppb 95% CI, 2.0 to 5.0), atopic nonasthmatic children (3.8 ppb 95% CI, 2. 7 to 5.5; 5.7 ppb 95% CI, 4.1 to 8.0), or nonatopic nonasthmatic children (3.4 ppb 95% CI, 2.8 to 4.1; 3.5 ppb 95% CI, 3.0 to 4.1). Thus, exhaled nitric oxide was raised in atopic asthmatics but not in nonatopic asthmatics, and these nonatopic asthmatics had levels of exhaled nitric oxide similar to those of the nonasthmatics whether atopic or not.