Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Tob Control ; 15(4): 302-7, 2006 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16885579

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the relationship between smoke-free law coverage and secondhand smoke (SHS) exposure in the United States non-smoking adult population. DESIGN: We used data from the 1999-2002 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, a cross-sectional survey designed to monitor the health and nutritional status of the US population. Serum cotinine levels were available for 5866 non-smoking adults from 57 survey locations. Each location was categorised into one of three groups indicating extensive, limited, and no coverage by a smoke-free law. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The proportion of adults with SHS exposure, defined as having serum cotinine levels > or = 0.05 ng/ml. RESULTS: Among non-smoking adults living in counties with extensive smoke-free law coverage, 12.5% were exposed to SHS, compared with 35.1% with limited coverage, and 45.9% with no law. Adjusting for confounders, men and women residing in counties with extensive coverage had 0.10 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.06 to 0.16) and 0.19 (95% CI 0.11 to 0.34) times the odds of SHS exposure compared to those residing in counties without a smoke-free law. CONCLUSIONS: These results support the scientific evidence suggesting that smoke-free laws are an effective strategy for reducing SHS exposure.


Assuntos
Exposição Ambiental/análise , Restaurantes/legislação & jurisprudência , Fumar/legislação & jurisprudência , Poluição por Fumaça de Tabaco/análise , Adulto , Idoso , Biomarcadores/sangue , Cotinina/sangue , Estudos Transversais , Exposição Ambiental/legislação & jurisprudência , Feminino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Poluição por Fumaça de Tabaco/legislação & jurisprudência , Estados Unidos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...