Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Prof Nurse ; 15(7): 449-51, 2000 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11129927

RESUMO

A significant minority of patients will require specialist advice or further treatment after undergoing a TURP. Nurse-led telephone follow-up provides such patients with easy continued access to a specialist centre. When setting up a post-surgical telephone follow-up clinic, issues relating to patient selection, staff availability and administrative support needs must be considered.


Assuntos
Alta do Paciente , Cuidados Pós-Operatórios/enfermagem , Telefone , Ressecção Transuretral da Próstata/enfermagem , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Satisfação do Paciente , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde
2.
Br J Urol ; 78(3): 401-4, 1996 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8881950

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To determine the most efficient method to follow patients after transurethral prostatectomy (TURP) such that only those patients suffering significant post-operative problems are reviewed. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study comprised two parts: (1) a retrospective review of the case notes of 100 consecutive patients who underwent TURP under one consultant to determine whether any factors could be identified pre- or post-operatively by which those patients most likely to require clinic review could be selected and; (2) a prospective review of the succeeding 100 patients undergoing TURP, using a telephone 'screening' call made by the urological research nurse 3 months after the operation. Patients who requested follow-up and those patients with malignancy or admitted in high-pressure chronic retention were reviewed in the out-patient department. RESULTS: In the first part, 17 patients (17%) required an out-patient review for malignancy. Only nine patients (11%) with benign histology required further treatment after TURP; this subgroup could not be identified on the basis of their pre- or post-operative symptoms. In the second part, 23 patients were not reviewed by telephone; 14 had carcinoma of the prostate, eight had no telephone and one could not be contacted after seven attempts. Of the remaining 77 contacted by phone, 61 (79%) declined further clinic review and 16 (21%) requested follow-up for persistent problems. A mean of two calls was made per patient and the mean duration of each call was 6.3 min. CONCLUSIONS: Based on pre- or post-operative symptoms at the time of discharge, there is no reliable method of identifying those patients who have a poor result after TURP. Telephone screening of patients at 3 months identified successfully those patients who required an out-patient review and enabled resources to be targeted towards this difficult group of patients.


Assuntos
Prostatectomia/enfermagem , Hiperplasia Prostática/enfermagem , Telefone , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Assistência Ambulatorial , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Cuidados Pós-Operatórios/enfermagem , Estudos Prospectivos , Prostatectomia/métodos , Hiperplasia Prostática/cirurgia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Retenção Urinária/enfermagem , Retenção Urinária/cirurgia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...