Denosumab in Giant Cell Tumor of Bone: Multidisciplinary Medical Management Based on Pathophysiological Mechanisms and Real-World Evidence.

(1) Despite the benign nature of the giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB), it shows a local recurrence rate of up to 50% and a chance of malignant transformation. The widely accepted local therapy in extremity GCTB is surgery, in the form of extended intralesional curettage with adequate disease clearance and retention of the limb, wherever possible. Denosumab, a human monoclonal antibody directed against the RANKL and associated inhibition of the RANKL pathway, is a relevant therapy option for advanced GCTB, to benefit tumor response and surgical down-staging. (2) The literature review of patients with GCTB treated with denosumab is performed via PubMed, using suitable keywords from January 2009 to January 2021. (3) Current indications for denosumab use are not definitively clear and unambiguous. Most GCTB patients with localized disease can be successfully treated with surgical curettage, and the role of denosumab in preoperative therapy in this patient population remains unclear. (4) However, patients with primary unresectable lesions or metastases may experience long-term clinical and radiological remission and pain control with denosumab treatment, and in this clinical situation, denosumab is currently the treatment of choice.

Diagnostic Utility of Genetic and Immunohistochemical H3-3A Mutation Analysis in Giant Cell Tumour of Bone.

To validate the reliability and implementation of an objective diagnostic method for giant cell tumour of bone (GCTB). H3-3A gene mutation testing was performed using two different methods, Sanger sequencing and immunohistochemical (IHC) assays. A total of 214 patients, including 120 with GCTB and 94 with other giant cell-rich bone lesions, participated in the study. Sanger sequencing and IHC with anti-histone H3.3 G34W and G34V antibodies were performed on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissues, which were previously decalcified in EDTA if needed. The sensitivity and specificity of the molecular method was 100% (95% CI: 96.97-100%) and 100% (95% CI: 96.15-100%), respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of IHC was 94.32% (95% CI: 87.24-98.13%) and 100% (95% CI: 93.94-100.0%), respectively. P.G35 mutations were discovered in 2/9 (22.2%) secondary malignant GCTBs and 9/13 (69.2%) GCTB after denosumab treatment. We confirmed in a large series of patients that evaluation of H3-3A mutational status using direct sequencing is a reliable tool for diagnosing GCTB, and it should be incorporated into the diagnostic algorithm. Additionally, we discovered IHC can be used as a screening tool. Proper tissue processing and decalcification are necessary. The presence of the H3-3A mutation did not exclude malignant GCTB. Denosumab did not eradicate the neoplastic cell population of GCTB.

Functional outcome of surgical treatment of adults with extremity osteosarcoma after megaprosthetic reconstruction-single-center experience.

BACKGROUND: Osteosarcoma is the most common primary malignant bone tumor in adults and is usually located in the long bones. Standard treatment consists of perioperative chemotherapy and radical surgical resection. Limb-sparing surgery using a variety of reconstructive techniques remains the gold standard. METHODS: In our study, we retrospectively analyzed 90 adult patients operated at our institution between 2000 and 2017 for extremity osteosarcoma that underwent limb-sparing reconstruction with the megaprosthesis. Sixty-one patients underwent resection and reconstruction of the distal femur, 9 patients-proximal femur, 7 patients-proximal tibia, 5 patients-total femoral resection and reconstruction, 5 patients-proximal humeral resection, and 3 patients-other types of resection with endoprosthetic reconstruction. The median follow-up time was 41 months, median overall survival was 86 months (3-225 months), and progression-free survival was 81 months (1-86 months). Functional assessment was made on 48 out of 56 living patients, after endoprosthetic reconstruction. The assessment was made according to MSTS functional scale. RESULTS: In 14 cases (15%), the endoprosthesis had to be explanted, or amputation was performed for local recurrence or septic complication. Due to a mechanical failure of the implant, we had to perform a revision in 5 patients (5%). Eighteen out of 74 patients with endoprosthesis died of the disease. The median MSTS score was 84% (53-100%), and the best result of 85% was achieved in patients after distal femoral resection with endoprosthetic reconstruction. CONCLUSION: Careful planning of the treatment of patients with extremity osteosarcoma that is performed at the referral centers gives the possibility of long-term survival with a good and excellent functional result.

Long-term follow-up in adults with extremity osteosarcoma: comparison of different surgical procedures - single-center experience.

INTRODUCTION: Osteosarcoma is the most common primary malignant bone tumor in adults and is usually located in long bones. Standard treatment consists of perioperative chemotherapy and radical surgical resection. In the case of the extremity location, the gold standard is limb-sparing surgery (LSS) using a variety of reconstructive techniques. AIM OF THE STUDY: To assess long-term results of adults patients treated for limb osteosarcoma in our referral center depending on the method of surgical treatment. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In our study, we analyzed 175 adult patients with localized disease (American Joint Committee on Cancer [AJCC] stage I-III) treated for extremity osteosarcoma at our institution between 2000 and 2017. The median observation time was 41 months (3-225 months). 111 patients were treated with LSS (80 patients had tumor resection followed by endoprosthetic reconstruction, 31 patients had local resection without reconstruction) and 64 patients underwent amputation. RESULTS: 5-year overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in the study group were 62% and 52% and the life expectancy was on average 136 months. In the group of patients treated with LSS, 5-year OS and PFS were 66% and 59%, respectively, and life expectancy was 147 months, while in the group of patients undergoing amputation 5-year OS, PFS and life expectancy were 55%, 42% and 117 months. CONCLUSIONS: The best results in the treatment of extremity osteosarcoma were achieved in a group of patients without distant metastases at the time of diagnosis, treated with perioperative chemotherapy and radical resection followed by endoprosthetic reconstruction.

Denosumab treatment of inoperable or locally advanced giant cell tumor of bone - Multicenter analysis outside clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB) is an osteolytic, locally aggressive, rarely metastazing bone tumor. This is a retrospective study evaluating a large series of GCTB patients treated with denosumab in routine practice in 6 European reference centers. METHODS: Patients with locally advanced, unresectable or metastatic GCTB, treated with denosumab outside clinical trials were eligible. Primary end-point was progression-free survival (PFS) for all patients; secondary end-points were: type of surgery, relapse rate and event-free survival for patients after preoperative denosumab + surgery. RESULTS: We identified 138 patients treated in the period 2011-2016. In 40/43 cases the diagnosis was confirmed by H3F3A gene mutation. Median follow-up time was 23 months (range 6-48). Primary tumor was located in lower limb (38%) - mostly in femur and tibia, in upper limb (34%), and in pelvis/axial skeleton/ribs (28%). 110 (80%) patients had primary tumors, 28 (22%) recurrent tumors after previous surgical procedures (+/- radiotherapy). 89/138 patients had locally advanced GCTB and underwent neoadjuvant denosumab. The median denosumab treatment duration was 8 months (median number of cycles 11), 98% had clinical benefit from therapy. 39 (44%) had wide en-bloc resection - WE (+implantation of the prosthesis in 17 cases), the other 50 (56%) cases had intralesional curettage - C. Progression after surgical treatment was observed in 19 patients, 16 of them after C (32%); 13 patients underwent denosumab re-challenge, and all responded. Two-year progression-free survival (PFS; from denosumab start) rate was 81%; 2-year EventFS (from surgery) was significantly better in WE group (93%) vs 55% in C group (p = 0.006). Treatment was well tolerated with only 2 cases of grade 3 toxicity and one osteonecrosis of the jaw. CONCLUSION: Our retrospective study confirms that denosumab is extremely efficient in unresectable/metastatic disease as well as in a neoadjuvant setting. Our data confirm excellent efficacy and short-term tolerability of this drug. Our data suggest that neoadjuvant therapy with denosumab is the option for treatment of initially locally advanced tumors to facilitate complete surgical resection or avoid mutilating surgery. The risk of recurrences after curettage of GCTB following denosumab raises questions about the optimal management of such cases.

IDH1/2 Mutations Predict Shorter Survival in Chondrosarcoma.

Background. Recent studies have shown that isocitrate dehydrogenase 1/2 (IDH1/2)- activating mutations occur in a variety of cancers, including acute myeloid leukaemia, gliomas, and chondrosarcomas (CHS)s. The effect of IDH1/2 mutation on overall survival (OS) has not been reported in CHS. The aim of our study was to assess the prevalence of known cancer-related gene mutations in CHS, as well as their prognostic role in patient survival. Methods. DNA from FFPE samples of 80 patients (F:M- 1:1.3; mean age: 58 years; range 27-86) with histologically confirmed CHS (G1:29; G2:34; G3:17) was subjected to library preparation with the Ion AmpliSeq Cancer Hotspot Panel v2 and sequenced on the PGM Ion Torrent. Results. Among the clinical features only histological grade influenced OS. Deep sequencing identified 1784 single nucleotide variants. Of them, 426 were considered to be pathogenic or probably pathogenic. Activating IDH1/2 mutations were found in 27 patients (34%) including 17 R132 IDH1 (21%), 10 R172 IDH2 (13%) and 3 R140 IDH2 variants (4%). Three patients had concurrent IDH1 and IDH2 mutations. The R140 IDH2 mutant has not been reported to date in CHS patients. OS for CHS patients with IDH1/2 mutations was significantly lower than in patients without mutations (93% vs 64%; p<0.001). No other genetic feature of the Cancer Hotspot Panel had an impact on OS. Conclusions. In CHS, IDH1/2-mutation status and the histological aggressiveness of the CHS are important predictors for OS. The R140 IDH2 may also be a novel target for the treatment of CHS patients.

Treatment results of adult patients with primary bone tumours of the humerus with the use of the oncological modular endoprosthesis.

AIM OF THE STUDY: Primary bone tumours are relatively rare, but their diagnosis and treatment is difficult and connected with a high risk of complications. The goal of this report is a retrospective evaluation of outcomes in patients with primary tumours of the humerus treated in our centre with the use of modular endoprosthetic reconstruction. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Currently, surgical treatment is a standard procedure for local therapy, with wide tumour-free margin resection after a planned multidisciplinary and individualised strategy of tumour management based on the diagnostic biopsy result. The best option for patients to avoid disability is simultaneous surgical reconstruction aiming to spare the limb and its functionality. RESULTS: In this report, we present the results of treatment of our 11 adult patients suffering from primary bone tumours of the humerus, who have undergone wide bone resection followed by reconstruction with the use of a modular MUTARS® endoprosthesis. CONCLUSIONS: The study showed that prosthetic reconstruction of the resected humerus due to a primary bone tumour is safe and acceptable for patients; despite the fact that limitation of active abduction of the shoulder is up to 20 grades, this surgical procedure provides satisfactory limb function.

[The long-term treatment outcomes of adult osteosarcoma]. / Odlegle wyniki leczenia doroslych chorych na miesaka kosciopochodnego.

Osteosarcoma is the most common primary bone tumor. Treatment of osteosarcoma patients is based on chemotherapy as well as surgical resection of primary tumor and distant metastases. Lung metastases are the primary cause of death in this group of patients. AIM: The aim of this study is to summarize the 20 years of osteosarcoma treatment outcomes in the Maria Sklodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Center and Institute of Oncology in Warsaw. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Our analysis included clinical data of 299 osteosarcoma patients aged between 14 and 81 years (median 32) treated in Maria Sklodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Center between 1998 and 2016. The standard therapeutic protocol included perioperative anthracycline-based chemotherapy and surgical resection of primary tumor and distant metastases. The statistical analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier estimator, log-rank test and Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS: In analyzed group 38 (13%) patients had distant metastases at the diagnosis. The tumor size was greater than 8 cm in 61% of cases. In the histopathological assessment the most prevalent subtype was the conventional one (diagnosed in 76% of cases) and histological grade 3 (79%). The 5-year survival rate for patients with localized disease reached 46%. The negative prognostic factors included: distant metastases at diagnosis, axial location of primary tumor, unresectability of the primary lesion, higher histological grade, and older age of patients. CONCLUSIONS: The best results of the treatment of osteosarcoma patients are achieved with multidisciplinary treatment, and when the reference center supports other healthcare providers in management of diagnostic and treatment procedures of osteosarcoma patients.

Denosumab treatment of inoperable or locally advanced giant cell tumor of bone.

Giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB) is an osteolytic, locally aggressive tumor that rarely metastasizes and typically occurs in the bones. At present, the primary treatment for GCTB is curettage with local adjuvants. Giant cells express receptor activator of nuclear factor-κB ligand (RANKL). Denosumab, a RANKL inhibitor appears to present an effective therapeutic option in advanced cases of GCTB. The aim of the present study was to confirm the efficacy of denosumab in large group of patients with locally advanced GCTB. A total of 35 patients with histologically confirmed GCTB that were treated with denosumab with no participation in clinical trials between May 2013 and September 2015 were included in the present study. Denosumab treatment was administered until complete tumor resection was feasible or tumor progression or unacceptable toxicity had occurred. The mean denosumab treatment duration was 7.4 months. A total of 17 patients received surgery following denosumab treatment: 11 patients underwent wide en bloc resection with prosthesis implantation in 10 cases and 6 patients were treated with intralesional curettage. Tumor progression was observed in 2 patients that underwent intralesional curettage without prosthesis implantation. In addition, tumor progression was observed during denosumab treatment in 2 patients that had previously undergone radiotherapy. The overall 1-year progression-free survival rate was 92.8%. Thus, for patients with advanced, unresectable, progressive or symptomatic pretreated GCTB, denosumab provides a therapeutic option not previously available, which has become the standard therapy in multidisciplinary management of GCTB.

The long-term results and prognostic significance of cutaneous melanoma surgery using sentinel node biopsy with triple technique.

BACKGROUND: The sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLN) is a basic staging method in all primary cutaneous melanomas ≥pT1b. The standard technique is a triple technique consisting of preoperative lymphoscintigraphy, intraoperative blue-dye lymphography, and gamma-probe assessment. We performed the analysis of long-term results in a very large one-institution series of cutaneous melanoma patients. METHODS: We have analyzed treatment results of a group of 1764 consecutive patients with cutaneous melanoma, who underwent SLN biopsy between 1997 and 2008 in one tertiary center. Additionally, we have analyzed the outcomes of a group of 473 patients with positive SLN biopsy undergoing completion lymph node dissection (CLND). Median follow-up time was 5.3 years. RESULTS: Metastases to SLN (SLN+) were found in 19.9%. Eight-year overall survival (OS) rate in the entire group was 73.5%, 80% without SLN metastases (SLN-) and 50% in group with SLN+ (p < 0.001). Independent prognostic factors for OS were as follows: presence of metastases to SLN, primary tumor ulceration, and higher mitotic index (>5/mm(2)) of primary tumor. The nodal recurrences in the biopsied lymphatic basin were 5.4%. The metastases to non-sentinel lymph nodes (NSLN found in 27% of patients with SLN+) correlated (on multivariable logistic regression analysis) with primary tumor thickness >4 mm, SLN metastatic deposit size >1 mm, and extracapsular involvement of SLN. In an additionally analyzed SLN+ group, the NSLN involvement was related to poorer prognosis (8-year OS rate NSLN- vs NSLN+: 59.6 vs. 34.7%, respectively). The independent prognostic factors for OS in the SLN+ group were a higher Breslow thickness and ulceration of primary tumor, metastases to more than 1 lymph nodes. CONCLUSIONS: The long-term results confirm crucial prognostic significance of SLN biopsy in cutaneous melanoma. We identified factors related to NSLN involvement, which in the future may limit indications for CLND.

Surgical downstaging in an open-label phase II trial of denosumab in patients with giant cell tumor of bone.

BACKGROUND: Surgical resection with curative intent for giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB) may be associated with severe morbidity. This interim analysis evaluated reduction in surgical invasiveness after denosumab treatment in patients with resectable GCTB. METHODS: Patients with primary or recurrent GCTB, for whom the initially planned surgery was associated with functional compromise or morbidity, received denosumab 120 mg subcutaneously every 4 weeks (additional doses on days 8 and 15 of the first cycle). Planned and actual GCTB-related surgical procedures before and after denosumab treatment were reported. Patients were followed for surgical outcome, adverse events, and recurrence following resection. RESULTS: Overall, 222 patients were evaluable for surgical downstaging (54 % were women; median age 34 years). Lesions (67 % primary and 33 % recurrent) were located in the axial (15 %) and appendicular skeleton (85 %). At the data cutoff date, most patients had not yet undergone surgery (n = 106; 48 %) or had a less morbid procedure (n = 84; 38 %) than originally planned. Median (interquartile range) time on denosumab was 19.5 (12.4-28.6) months for the 106 patients who had not undergone surgery and were continuing on monthly denosumab. Native joint preservation was 96 % (n = 24/25) for patients with planned joint/prosthesis replacement and 86 % (n = 30/35) for patients with planned joint resection/fusion. Of the 116 patients who had surgery (median postsurgical follow-up 13.0 [8.5-17.9] months), local recurrence occurred in 17 (15 %) patients. CONCLUSION: For patients with resectable GCTB, neoadjuvant denosumab therapy resulted in beneficial surgical downstaging, including either no surgery or a less morbid surgical procedure.

Melanoma without a detectable primary site with metastases to lymph nodes.

OBJECTIVE: To compare outcomes of patients with clinical nodal melanoma metastases that occurred without a detectable primary tumor (melanoma of unknown primary site; MUP) with those with a known primary site (KPM). METHODS: We included data from 459 consecutive patients treated from 1994 to 2007 with radical therapeutic lymph node dissection (LND; stage IIIB, C) due to clinically palpable and pathologically confirmed lymph node metastases (229 axillary; 230 ilioinguinal). The median follow-up was 49 months. RESULTS: LND was performed in 59 cases (12.9%; 29 men, 30 women) due to MUP nodal metastases, including 33 axillary (14.4%) and 26 ilioinguinal (11.3%). In the MUP group, the 3- and 5-year survival rates were 48% and 41%, respectively. Similar rates were observed in patients with KPM, even with matched-pair analyses. Established prognostic factors (number of metastatic nodes, p=.005; extracapsular extension of metastases, p=.002) influenced survival in the MUP group. Relapses occurred in 31 (53%) and 299 (74.7%) cases in the MUP and KPM groups, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Survival rates in the MUP and KPM groups were similar, and the same prognostic factors affected both. Thus, all MUP cases should be treated as standard stage III melanomas.