Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Exp Oncol ; 44(2): 142-147, 2022 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35964652

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: In spite of significant advances in diagnosis of prostate cancer (PCa), the detection and differential diagnosis of metastatic lymph node involvement remains an important clinical dilemma in a large number of cases. Contrast-enhanced abdominal computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), in part when using T1-weighed images (T1-WI and T2-WI), allow evaluating indirectly the presence of invasion in regional lymph nodes by assessing their diameter and morphology. Nonetheless, these techniques do not appear to be sufficiently sensitive for direct identification of lymph nodes with metastatic lesions. AIM: To study the significance of the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) of diffusion-weighted MRI in detection of metastatic lymph node involvement in PCa patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study involved 35 patients with histologically verified PCa. Based on multiparametric prostatic MRI findings and pathomorphological reports, we have performed ADC measurements for pelvic lymph nodes either with (n = 15, mean size 1.78 ± 0.59 cm) or without metastases (n = 20, mean size: 0.94 ± 0.06 cm) in PCa patients who underwent radical prostatectomy with lymph node dissection. RESULTS: No significant diffe-rences were observed when comparing mean sizes of N+ and N- pelvic lymph nodes. At the same time, when comparing mean ADC values for N+ and N- pelvic lymph nodes, we observed a statistically significant difference: 0.74 ± 0.09 · 10-3 mm2/s in metastatic lymph node vs 1.05 ± 0.23 · 10-3 mm2/s in lymph nodes without metastatic involvement (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The use of ADC for diffusion-weighted MRI may provide valuable information for detection of metastatic lymph node involvement in patients with PCa.


Assuntos
Imagem de Difusão por Ressonância Magnética , Neoplasias da Próstata , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Imagem de Difusão por Ressonância Magnética/métodos , Humanos , Linfonodos/diagnóstico por imagem , Linfonodos/patologia , Metástase Linfática/diagnóstico por imagem , Metástase Linfática/patologia , Masculino , Neoplasias da Próstata/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias da Próstata/patologia , Neoplasias da Próstata/cirurgia
2.
J Physiol Pharmacol ; 67(3): 395-402, 2016 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27512000

RESUMO

Gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT) is a membrane enzyme present not only in the liver but also in healthy endometrial epithelium. Its overexpression has been demonstrated in numerous malignancies, where it exerts an anti-apoptotic effect and causes drug resistance in response to oxidation stress. Aim of the study was investigation of GGT expression in postmenopausal patients with endometrioid adenocarcinoma of the uterus (EAC). The material comprised 98 paraffin-embedded post-operative tumour samples of EAC from postmenopausal patients and a control group of 60 normal human postmenopausal endometrium samples. For immunohistochemical specimen staining, polyclonal IgG anti-GGT was used; for GGT expression measurement, a semi-quantitative method was applied. In EAC patients, 16 (16.33%) were diagnosed as stage IA, 46 (46.93%) as stage IB, 14 (14.29%) as stage II, and 22 (22.45%) as stage IIIA-C, according to the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) classification. Fifty-six (57.14%) patients were diagnosed with low- or moderate-grade (G1-2) disease, and 42 (42.86%) were diagnosed with high-grade (G3) disease. Cytoplasmic GGT staining was confirmed in all samples, while apical membrane GGT staining was observed only in G1-2 EAC specimens and the control group. In G3 EAC specimens, GGT cytoplasmic staining and high nuclear polymorphism areas were predominantly shown. Comparable high GGT median apical expression was confirmed in healthy endometrium (2.0, S.E.M. = 0.28) and in G1-2 EAC (2.0, S.E.M. = 0.27); however, in G3 tumours, GGT expression was significantly lower (0.0, S.E.M. = 0.07) than in healthy endometrium (P < 0.001 and P < 0.001, respectively). After stratification of the cancer cases according to FIGO staging, the lowest median apical GGT expression levels were in II EAC (0.0, S.E.M. = 0.64) tumours compared with IA (4.0, S.E.M. = 0.47) tumours, specimen and normal endometrium (2.0, S.E.M. = 2.8) (P < 0001). Stage IB EAC and IIIA-C EAC (1.0, S.E.M. = 0.16) cases showed only moderate median apical expression of GGT (1.0, S.E.M. = 0.24). We concluded that impaired GGT expression has the potential to become a valuable tool for stratifying EEC patients' prognosis and treatment planning.


Assuntos
Biomarcadores Tumorais/metabolismo , Carcinoma Endometrioide/metabolismo , Neoplasias do Endométrio/metabolismo , Pós-Menopausa/metabolismo , gama-Glutamiltransferase/metabolismo , Idoso , Endométrio/metabolismo , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prognóstico
3.
Ultraschall Med ; 37(5): 516-523, 2016 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26126150

RESUMO

Objective: To externally validate the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis (IOTA) Simple Rules (SR) by examiners with different levels of sonographic experience defined by the European Federation of Societies for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology (EFSUMB) and to assess the morphological ultrasound features of the adnexal tumors classified as inconclusive based on IOTA SR. Materials and Methods: In the two-year prospective study adnexal tumors were assessed preoperatively with transvaginal ultrasound by examiners with different levels of experience (level 1- IOTA SR1, level 2-IOTA SR2). Additionally, an expert (level 3) evaluated all tumors by subjective assessment (SA). If the rules could not be applied, the tumors were considered inconclusive. The final diagnosis was based on the histopathological result of the removed mass. The diagnostic performance measures for the assessed model were sensitivity, specificity, negative (LR-) and positive(LR+) likelihood ratios, accuracy (ACC) and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR). Results: 226 women with adnexal tumors scheduled for surgery were included in the stutdy. The prevalence of malignancy was 36.3 % in the group of all studied tumors and was 52.5 % in the inconclusive group (n = 40) (p = 0.215). Fewer tumors were classified as inconclusive by level 2 examiners compared to level 1 examiners [20 (8.8 %) vs. 40 (17.7 %); p = 0.008], resulting from the discrepancy in the evaluation of acoustic shadows and the vascularization within the tumor. For level 1 examiners a diagnostic strategy using IOTA SR1 +MA (assuming malignancy when SR inconclusive) achieved a sensitivity, specificity and DOR of 96.3 %, 81.9 %, 13.624 respectively. For level 2 examiners the diagnostic strategy for IOTA SR2 +MA achieved a sensitivity, specificity and DOR of 95.1 %, 89.6 %, 137,143, respectively. Adding SA by an expert (or level 3 examiner) when IOTA SR were not applicable improved the specificity of the test and achieved a DOR of 505.137 (SR1 +SA) and 293.627 (SR2 +SA). The SA by an expert proved to have the best diagnostic performance with a DOR of 5768.857, and a sensitivity and specificity of 97.6 % and 99.3 % respectively. Within the inconclusive group the most common tumors were unilocular-solid (n-13), solid (n-8) and multilocular-solid (n-10) ones. All multilocular tumors were classified as inconclusive because of their size (≥ 100 mm) and were found to be benign by pathology. Most of the inconclusive tumors with cystic content presented low-level (43.75 %) echogenicity, followed by ground-glass (34.37 %), mixed (12.5 %) and anechoic (9.4 %). Conclusion: The study results show excellent diagnostic performance of IOTA Simple Rules followed by subjective expert assessment in inconclusive tumors irrespective of the level of experience, while subjective assessment by an expert still has the highest diagnostic odds ratio. The number of inconclusive cases seems to depend on the level of ultrasound expertise and less experienced examiners have a tendency to overestimate blood flow and a presence of acoustic shadows within the tumors. IOTA SR were not applicable either because no benign or malignant features were found or both were identified. Within inconclusive tumors the majority of cases comprise malignant masses that are either unilocular-solid, solid tumors or small multilocular-solid ones with a diameter of less than 100 mm.


Assuntos
Competência Clínica , Endossonografia/métodos , Internacionalidade , Neoplasias Ovarianas/diagnóstico , Adulto , Idoso , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias Ovarianas/classificação , Neoplasias Ovarianas/patologia , Neoplasias Ovarianas/cirurgia , Ovário/diagnóstico por imagem , Ovário/patologia , Polônia , Estudos Prospectivos , Sensibilidade e Especificidade
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...