Challenges and Learning Curves in Adopting TaTME and Robotic Surgery for Rectal Cancer: A Cusum Analysis.

New techniques are being developed to improve the results of laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer. This paper analyzes the learning curves for transanal total mesorectal excision (taTME) and robot-assisted surgery in our colorectal surgery department. We analyzed retrospectively data from patients undergoing curative and elective surgery for rectal cancer ≤12 cm from the anal verge. We excluded extended surgeries. We used cumulative sum (CUSUM) curve analysis to identify inflection points. Between 2015 and 2021, 588 patients underwent surgery for rectal cancer at our center: 67 taTME and 79 robot-assisted surgeries. To overcome the operative time learning curve, 14 cases were needed for taTME and 53 for robot-assisted surgery. The morbidity rate started to decrease after the 17th case in taTME and after the 49th case in robot-assisted surgery, but it is much less abrupt in robot-assisted group. During the initial learning phase, the rate of anastomotic leakage was higher in taTME (35.7% vs. 5.7%). Two Urological lesions occurred in taTME but not in robot-assisted surgery. The conversion rate was higher in robot-assisted surgery (1.5% vs. 10.1%). Incorporating new techniques is complex and entails a transition period. In our experience, taTME involved a higher rate of serious complications than robot-assisted surgery during initial learning period but required a shorter learning curve.

Randomized clinical trial comparing side to end vs end to end techniques for colorectal anastomosis.

BACKGROUND: Low anterior resection syndrome affects 60%-90% of patients with anastomoses after colorectal resection. Consensus regarding the best anastomosis is lacking. OBJECTIVE: To compare outcomes after end-to-end versus side-to-end anastomoses. DESIGN: Randomized clinical trial. SETTINGS: University hospital (April 2016-October 2017). PATIENTS: Patients aged ≥18 years with rectal or sigmoid adenocarcinoma. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomized to undergo mechanical end-to-end or side-to-end (n = 33) anastomosis after laparoscopic resection. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcome was to assess intestinal function (COREFO and LARS questionnaires) 12 months after surgery or ileostomy closure. Secondary outcomes were postoperative complications and intestinal function and quality of life (SF-36® questionnaire) at different time points after surgery or ileostomy closure. RESULTS: No significant differences in intestinal function were observed between the two groups 12 months after surgery. Subanalysis of low-mid rectum tumors with end-to-end anastomosis yielded better function at 12 months. Postoperative complications did not differ between the two groups (p = 0.070), but reinterventions were more common in the side-to-end group (p = 0.040). Multivariate analysis found neoadjuvant treatment was independently associated with intestinal dysfunction at 12 months (ß = 0.41, p = 0.033, COREFO; ß = 0.41, p = 0.024, LARS). CONCLUSIONS: End-to-end anastomosis yielded low rates of severe complications and reintervention, as well as better intestinal function at 12 months in the subgroup with tumors in the low-mid rectum. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT02746224.

La estenosis del tronco celiaco y duodenopancreatectomía cefálica: ¿un riesgo infravalorado? / Celiac artery stenosis and cephalic duodenopancreatectomy: An undervalued risk?

Introducción La estenosis significativa del tronco celiaco habitualmente cursa de forma asintomática. No obstante, cuando se interrumpe la arcada de las arterias pancreatoduodenales, puede producirse isquemia visceral. El objetivo de este estudio es determinar si la estenosis preoperatoria del tronco celiaco es un factor de riesgo de complicaciones en pacientes sometidos a duodenopancreatectomía (DPC). Material y métodos Hemos analizado retrospectivamente a 58 pacientes consecutivos sometidos a DPC. Hemos relacionado la estenosis significativa del tronco celiaco con la evolución posquirúrgica. En todos los casos se ha realizado un estudio mediante tomografía computarizada multidetector (TCDM) de 16 canales en tres fases hepáticas. Hemos revisado la TCDM prequirúrgica centrándonos en la morfología del tronco celiaco, especialmente la presencia o ausencia de estenosis significativa (> 50%).Resultados Encontramos estenosis del tronco celiaco > 50% en 13 pacientes (22%). La mortalidad total fue de 3 pacientes (5%). La morbilidad total fue del 62%. En 16 pacientes (28%) hubo complicaciones graves, de los que 8 (62%) pertenecen al grupo de estenosis significativa del tronco celiaco (p=0,004); 10 pacientes (17%) presentaron fístula pancreática, 5 (38%) vs. 5 (11%) (p=0,036); 14 pacientes (24%) necesitaron reoperación, 7 (54%) vs. 7 (16%) (p=0,009); 7 pacientes (12%) presentaron hemoperitoneo, 4 (31%) vs. 3 (7%) (p=0,038), en los grupos con y sin estenosis del tronco celiaco respectivamente. Conclusiones La estenosis radiológicamente significativa del tronco celiaco es un factor de riesgo de complicaciones graves tras DPC. El estudio del calibre de la AMS con TCDM debería ser sistemático antes de una DPC. Debería valorarse preoperatoriamente la corrección de la estenosis significativa del tronco celiaco (AU)

Introduction Significant celiac trunk or artery stenosis (CAS) is normally asymptomatic. However, when the arteries of the pancreatoduodenal arcade are occluded, it could trigger avisceral ischaemia. The objective of this study is to determine whether preoperative CAS is a risk factor for developing complications in patients subjected to duodenopancreatectomy(DPC). Material and methods: We have retrospectively analysed 58 consecutive patients subjected to DPC. We have associated significant CAS with post-surgical outcome. In all cases a 16-channel multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) in three hepatic phases was performed. We have reviewed the pre-surgical MDCT focusing on the morphology of the celiacartery (CA), particularly in the presence or absence of significant stenosis (>50%). Results: We found CAS >50% in 13 patients (22%). The overall mortality was 5% (3 patients). Serious complications developed in 16 (28%) patients, 8 (62%) of whom belonged to the group with significant CAS (P = .004). Ten patients (17%) had a pancreatic fistula, 5 (38%) vs. 5 (11%)(P = .036); Fourteen patients (24%) needed new surgery, 7 (54%) vs. 7 (16%) (P = .009); Seven patients (12%) had a haemoperitoneum, 4 (31%) vs. 3 (7%) (P = .038), in the group with and without CAS, respectively. Conclusions: Significant radiological CAS is a risk factor of serious complications after DPC. The study of the calibre of the superior mesenteric artery (SMA) with MDCT should beroutine before a DPC. The correction of a significant CAS should be evaluated preoperatively (AU)

[Celiac artery stenosis and cephalic duodenopancreatectomy: an undervalued risk?]. / La estenosis del tronco celiaco y duodenopancreatectomía cefálica: ¿un riesgo infravalorado?

INTRODUCTION: Significant celiac trunk or artery stenosis (CAS) is normally asymptomatic. However, when the arteries of the pancreatoduodenal arcade are occluded, it could trigger a visceral ischaemia. The objective of this study is to determine whether preoperative CAS is a risk factor for developing complications in patients subjected to duodenopancreatectomy (DPC). MATERIAL AND METHODS: We have retrospectively analysed 58 consecutive patients subjected to DPC. We have associated significant CAS with post-surgical outcome. In all cases a 16-channel multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) in three hepatic phases was performed. We have reviewed the pre-surgical MDCT focusing on the morphology of the celiac artery (CA), particularly in the presence or absence of significant stenosis (>50%). RESULTS: We found CAS >50% in 13 patients (22%). The overall mortality was 5% (3 patients). Serious complications developed in 16 (28%) patients, 8 (62%) of whom belonged to the group with significant CAS (P=.004). Ten patients (17%) had a pancreatic fistula, 5 (38%) vs. 5 (11%) (P=.036); Fourteen patients (24%) needed new surgery, 7 (54%) vs. 7 (16%) (P=.009); Seven patients (12%) had a haemoperitoneum, 4 (31%) vs. 3 (7%) (P=.038), in the group with and without CAS, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Significant radiological CAS is a risk factor of serious complications after DPC. The study of the calibre of the superior mesenteric artery (SMA) with MDCT should be routine before a DPC. The correction of a significant CAS should be evaluated preoperatively.

Síndrome posconsumo de cocaína inyectada a partir de las observaciones en una sala de consumo supervisada / Post cocaine intravenous syndrome described from the observation in a drug consumption supervised room

No disponible