Management of Sleep Disorders in Community-Dwelling Older Women and Men at the Time of Diagnosis.

OBJECTIVES: Sedative and hypnotic medications are associated with harm, and guidelines suggest limiting their use. Only limited evidence has described how older adults are managed following an initial sleep disorder diagnosis. We aimed to describe clinical management patterns of sleep disorders in older women and men at the time of initial diagnosis. DESIGN: Population-based retrospective cohort study using linked administrative databases. SETTING: Ontario, Canada. PARTICIPANTS: Community-dwelling adults aged 66 and older, diagnosed with a new sleep disorder by a primary care provider (n = 30 729; 56% women and 44% men). We compared women and men for each outcome. MEASUREMENTS: The primary outcome was prescription of a medication used for sleep within 30 days of a new sleep disorder diagnosis. Additional analysis included medical investigations such as sleep studies and visits to specialists who manage obstructive sleep disorders within 90 days of diagnosis. RESULTS: Among the 30 729 older adults with a new sleep disorder diagnosis, 5512 (17.9% total; 18.8% of women and 16.9% of men) were prescribed a medication used for sleep. Compared with men, women were somewhat more likely to be prescribed at least one sedative medication (adjusted odds ratio = 1.09; 95% confidence interval = 1.03-1.16). A total of 2573 (8.4%) older adults underwent a sleep study, and 3743 (12.2%) were evaluated by a specialist; both occurred more commonly in men. CONCLUSION: In our cohort, almost 1 in 5 older adults with a new sleep disorder diagnosis were prescribed a medication used for sleep; of these, a higher proportion were women. Comparatively few older adults were further evaluated; of these, a higher proportion were men. Our study highlights the high rates at which medications are prescribed to older adults with a new sleep disorder diagnosis and identifies potential sex differences in the management of such diagnoses. J Am Geriatr Soc 1-8, 2019. J Am Geriatr Soc 67:2094-2101, 2019.

Looking for lithotripsy: accessibility and portability of Canadian healthcare.

BACKGROUND: Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) is a definitive, ambulatory and non-invasive modality for treating kidney stones. ESWL is not available in all urban centres and many Canadians must either travel, sometimes out of province, or wait to have this procedure performed. We sought to evaluate the variability in access to ESWL treatment. METHOD: We compiled a comprehensive list of ESWL centres in Canada and contacted all centres in 2011 to assess their wait times, out-of-province patient fees, and roles and responsibilities of the referring physician. RESULTS: We contacted all 23 ESWL facilities across Canada (100% response rate). Wait times for elective ESWL procedures ranged from one day to over one year, with a mean of 8.4 weeks (SD, 16.76 weeks). No centres refused out-of-province patients, although five discouraged travel to their centre owing to their prolonged wait times. No facilities charged extra fees for out-of-province patients. Ten (43%) facilities required a secondary consultation by a urolo-gist at the centre before booking. Twelve (52%) of the centres indicated the waiting time could be shortened if the referring physician were to advocate on the patient's behalf. Contact was repeated one year later in 2012 with five centres, and the results were similar. INTERPRETATION: There is marked variation in wait times across Canada for ESWL but there are few barriers to care. Patients' waits may be shortened by physician advocacy.