Transvenous lead extraction safety and efficacy in infected and noninfected patients using mechanical-only tools: Prospective registry from a high-volume center.

BACKGROUND: Transvenous lead extraction (TLE) is a well-established treatment option for patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED) complications. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of TLE in CIED infection and non-CIED infection patients. METHODS: Consecutive patients who underwent TLE between 2016 and 2022 entered the EXTRACT Registry. Models of prediction were constructed for periprocedural clinical and procedural success and the incidence of major complications, including death in 30 days. RESULTS: The registry enrolled 504 patients (mean age 66.6 ± 12.8 years; 65.7% male). Complete procedural success was achieved in 474 patients (94.0%) and clinical success in 492 patients (97.6%). The total number of major and minor complications was 16 (3.2%) and 51 (10%), respectively. Three patients (0.6%) died during the procedure. New York Heart Association functional class IV and C-reactive protein levels defined before the procedure were independent predictors of any major complication, including death in 30 days in CIED infection patients. The time since the last preceding procedure and platelet count before the procedure were independent predictors of any major complication, including death in 30 days in non-CIED infection patients. CONCLUSIONS: TLE is safe and successfully performed in most patients, with a low major complication rate. CIED infection patients demonstrate better periprocedural clinical success and complete procedural success. However, CIED infection predicts higher 30-day mortality compared with non-CIED infection patients. Predictors of any major complication, including death in 30 days, differ between CIED infection and non-CIED infection patients.

The impact of complications related to transvenous lead extraction on the 12-month prognosis: Insights from the SILCARD registry.

BACKGROUND: Scant data exist on long-term outcomes, including death, in patients with complica-tions related to transvenous lead extractions (TLE). AIMS: We sought to characterize the population and examine the outcomes including risk factors for in-hospital complications and 12-month mortality and morbidity related to the complications in a large administrative database of patients undergoing TLE. RESULTS: From the database of patients hospitalized for cardiovascular diseases and included in the Silesian Cardiovascular Database (SILCARD) registry, we selected the admissions of those who underwent TLE according to the appropriate ICD-9 codes. The patients were divided into two groups based on whether they did or did not manifest any complications during their hospitalization for the TLE procedure. Between 2007 and 2019, we found a total of 835 patients who underwent TLE. TLE-related complications occurred in 56 patients (6.7%) of the Complications-Yes group while no complications were recorded in 779 (93.3%) patients of the Complications-No group. A significant difference in the rate of all-cause mortality (23.9% vs. 6.5%; P <0.001) and major adverse cardiac events (MACE) (58.7% vs. 39.4%; P = 0.01) between the Complications-Yes and Complications-No groups were recorded. Multivariable analysis of the entire study population revealed that prior dialysis, chronic kidney disease, and ventricular tachycardia were independent factors of a higher risk of TLE-related in-hospital complications. Multivariable analysis of the patients discharged from the hospital after the TLE procedure showed that TLE-related complications, a history of heart failure, and older age independently affected 12-month mortality. CONCLUSIONS: The presence of TLE-related in-hospital complications increased 12-month mortality.

Two-point left ventricle pacing and cardiac computed tomography.

Endocardial leads can potentially cause problems during coronary vessels visualization in multislice computed tomography (MSCT) due to a large number of artifacts. Based on presented case, we conclude that it is possible to perform MSCT of coronary arteries and leads visualization despite coexistence of four endocardial leads.

Influence of DDD rate response pacing with integrated double sensors on physical efficiency and quality of life.

AIMS: The aim of this study was to evaluate whether the use of a double sensor gives additional benefits for patients in improving physical efficiency as well as quality of life (QoL) as compared to the accelerometer sensor alone. METHODS AND RESULTS: The presented research is a prospective, randomized, single-blind clinical trial. Double-sensor (accelerometer and minute-ventilation) pacemakers (Guidant, Pulsar Max DR) were implanted in 20 patients with sinus node dysfunction (SND) and chronotropic incompetence. After randomization, patients were placed in one of two groups: 1, only the accelerometer sensor was activated; 2, both sensors were activated. After a 3-month follow-up, an initial cardio-pulmonary exercise test was performed, after which the patients were placed in the opposite group for a further 3 months. Finally, the second tests were performed. In 75% of the patients an improvement in QoL was observed in the double-sensor group (P = 0.0242) when compared with the single-sensor group. The addition of a ventilating sensor had no influence on the duration of exercise test (A: 11 +/- 3.19 vs. B: 11 +/- 2.92 P = 1.0000). The parameters of cardio-pulmonary exercise tests recorded in situations A and B before exertion, and 6 minutes after exertion were not statistically different. CONCLUSION: The use of double-sensor pacemakers does not improve physical efficiency; however, it does improve QoL.

Lead interaction: rare cause of oversensing during implantation procedure of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator system.

A variety of etiologies can cause erroneous detection in patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICDs). Interaction between two endocardial leads is rare and uncommon in causing electrical noise. During a reimplantation procedure of an ICD system in a 68-year-old man, additional electrical signals could be detected. The interaction between two endocardial defibrillation leads was identified as the cause of sensing problems. When it is not possible to extract the nonfunctional endocardial lead during implantation of the new electrode, it should be implanted away and not in parallel from the old one to avoid interaction between them. A variety of etiologies can cause erroneous detection in patiens with ICD. Interaction between two endocardial leads is rare and uncommon to cause electrical noise.

[Cor triatriatum--a case report]. / Serce trójprzedsionkowe lewostronne.

A case of a 54 year old female with cor tritriatum is described. Diagnostic role of transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography is discussed.